Author: tmpl_admin

  • Whiplash Injury, Chronic Pain, Non-Pharmacologic Managements Adjuncts

    Whiplash Injury, Chronic Pain, Non-Pharmacologic Managements Adjuncts

    Not everyone injured in a motor vehicle collision recovers completely. A percentage of those injured will suffer for years or sometimes even for decades. Documented examples of this chronic pain syndrome include:

    • In 1964, the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) published a study where the author followed 145 whiplash-injured patients for more than two years. The author reported that after a minimum of two years, between 45% to 83% of the injured patients continued to suffer from pain.* (1)

    *The author’s study initially included 266 injured patients, but at the follow-up assessment (more then 2 years later) only 145 were evaluated (121 of the original group were not evaluated at the two plus year follow-up). Of the 145 followed patients, 83% were still suffering pain symptoms. The author noted that if he assumed that 100% of the 121 subjects who were not evaluated were completely symptom free, then the incidence of chronic pain in the entire initial 266 patient set fell to 43%.

    • In 1989, the journal Neuro-Orthopedics published a 12.5-year (mean duration) study on whiplash-injured patients. The authors reported that 62% continued to suffer from significant pain symptoms attributed to the motor vehicle collision 12.5 years later. (2)
    • In 2000, the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology published a 7-year study on whiplash-injured patients. The authors reported that 39.6% continued to suffer from neck-shoulder pain 7 years after injury. This 39.6% chronic pain rate was three times greater than the pain noted in the matched control populations. (3)
    • In 2005, the journal Injury published a 7.5 year prospective study on whiplash-injured patients. The authors reported that 21% of these patients continued to suffer from clinically relevant pain 7.5 years after injury. An additional 48% continued to suffer from nuisance pain at the 7.5-year analysis. (4)
    • In 1990, the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) published a 10.8 year study on whiplash-injured patients. The authors reported that 40% of these patients continued to suffer from clinically significant pain 10.8 years after injury. An additional 40% continued to suffer from nuisance pain at the 10.8-year analysis. (5)
    • In 1996, the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) published a 15.5-year study on whiplash-injured patients. The authors reported that 43% of these patients continued to suffer from clinically significant pain 15.5 years after injury. An additional 28% continued to suffer from nuisance pain at the 15.5-year analysis. (6)
    • In 2002, the European Spine Journal published a 17-year study on whiplash-injured patients. The authors reported that 55% of these patients continued to suffer from residual pain 17 years after injury. Of those with residual symptoms, 25% suffered from neck pain every day, and 23% had pain radiating into their arm daily. (7)
    • In 2006, the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British) published a 30-year study on whiplash-injured patients. The authors reported that 15% of these patients continued to suffer from clinically significant pain 30 years after injury; their pain was such that they still required ongoing treatment. An additional 40% continued to suffer from nuisance pain at the 30-year analysis. (8)

    •••••

    In the vast majority of these chronic pain patients, secondary monetary gain does not appear to be the reason for their suffering. If secondary monetary gain were the motivation behind ongoing pain and suffering, such pain and suffering would resolve after receiving the monetary compensation. When an individual continues to complain of post-whiplash pain 2 plus, 7, 7.5, 10.8, 12.5, 15.5, 17, and even 30 years after the initial injury and after all possible monetary compensation has already been awarded, it is difficult to ascribe those chronic complaints to the desire to enhance monetary compensation. Several of the authors of the above studies made comments on this fact, including these:

    “If the symptoms resulting from an extension-acceleration injury of the neck are purely the result of litigation neurosis, it is difficult to explain why 45% [minimum, could be as high as 83%] of the patients should still have symptoms two years or more after settlement of their court action.” (1)

    “If symptoms were largely due to impending litigation it might be expected that symptoms would improve after settlement of the claim. Our results would seem to discount this theory, with the long-term outcome seeming to be determined before the settlement of compensation.” (2)

    The fact that symptoms do not resolve even after a mean 10 years supports the conclusion that litigation does not prolong symptoms. (5)

    Symptoms did not improve after settlement of litigation, which is consistent with previous published studies. (6)

    “It is not likely that the patients exposed to motor vehicle accidents would over-report or simulate their neck complaint at follow-up 17 years after the accident, as all compensation claims will have been settled.” (7)

    •••••

    In 1997, a study published in the journal Pain reported that chronic pain whiplash-injured patients have an abnormal psychological profile (9). However, the authors noted that in their review, they were unable to find any evidence that appropriate psychotherapy was able to effectively treat the patient’s pain. Rather, the psychotherapy helped the patient deal with their pain, but it did not remove their pain. In contrast, the authors were able to effectively eliminate the patient’s abnormal psychological profile, essentially 100% of the time, if and only if they were able to establish an organic lesion causing the patient’s pain and effectively treating it. The authors reported that the abnormal psychological profile was the consequence of the chronic pain.

    Other studies have also concluded that the whiplash-injured patient’s abnormal psychological profile is secondary to their chronic pain. As an example, in 1996, Squires and colleagues note (6):

    Studies have found that patients that were psychologically normal at the time of injury will develop abnormal psychological assessments if their symptoms persisted for three months.

    This study showed an “abnormal psychological profile in patients with symptoms after 15 years suggesting that this is both reactive to physical pain and persistent.”

    In 2010, Rooker and colleagues note (8):

    Whiplash-injured patients with a disability [including chronic pain symptoms] often develop an abnormal psychological profile.

    Other studies have also concluded that chronic whiplash pain is not, as a rule, psychometric, but rather it has an organic basis. In 1997, a study published in the Journal of Orthopedic Medicine followed whiplash-injured patients and a matched control population for a period of 10 years (10). Neck pain was 8 times more prevalent in the whiplash group than in the control group. Paraesthesia was 16 times more prevalent in the whiplash group than in the control group. Headaches were 11 times more prevalent in the whiplash group than in the control group. The combination of both back pain and neck pain was 32 times more prevalent in the whiplash group than in the control group. Importantly, objectively, the x-rays showed that radiographic degenerative changes in the cervical spine appeared 10 years earlier in the whiplash group than in the control group. The authors reported:

    “The prevalence of degenerative changes in the younger cervical spine [of the whiplash group] suggests that the condition has an organic basis.”

    “Degenerative change and its association with neck stiffness support an organic basis for the symptoms that follow soft tissue injuries of the neck.”

    •••••

    In 2007, a study was published summarizing the basis of all pain, including chronic pain, in the journal Medical Hypothesis (11). The author, from the Division of Inflammation and Pain Research, Los Angeles Pain Clinic, cites studies to support these conclusions:

    “The origin of all pain is inflammation and the inflammatory response.”

    “Irrespective of the type of pain, whether it is acute or chronic pain, peripheral or central pain, nociceptive or neuropathic pain, the underlying origin is inflammation and the inflammatory response.”

    “Activation of pain receptors, transmission and modulation of pain signals, neuroplasticity and central sensitization are all one continuum of inflammation and the inflammatory response.”

    “Irrespective of the characteristic of the pain, whether it is sharp, dull, aching, burning, stabbing, numbing or tingling, all pain arises from inflammation and the inflammatory response.”

    •••••

    In 1975, Stonebrink (12) addresses that the last phase of the pathophysiological response to trauma is tissue fibrosis. Boyd in 1953 (13), Cyriax in 1983 (14), and Majno/Joris in 2004 (15) note that there is tissue fibrosis subsequent to trauma. This fibrosis of repair subsequent to soft tissue trauma creates problems that can adversely affect the tissues and the patient for years, decades, or even forever.

    As an example, Cyriax (14):

    “Fibrous tissue is capable of maintaining an inflammation, originally traumatic, as a result of a habit continuing long after the initial [cause] has ceased to operate.”

    Connecting the dots, I propose the following model:

    Tissue trauma, including whiplash trauma,

    heals with varying degrees of fibrous tissue.

    Post-traumatic fibrous tissue is capable of maintaining an inflammatory response long after the initial cause has ceased to exist.

    This inflammatory fibrous tissue alters the threshold of the pain neurons, increasing the probability of chronic pain perception.

    •••••

    In 1971, biochemists Sune K. Bergström (Sweden; d.2004), Bengt I. Samuelsson (Sweden) and John R. Vane (United Kingdom; d. 2004) determined that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) could inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandins from the toxic fat arachidonic acid. They subsequently jointly received the 1982 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their research on prostaglandins. The official Nobel Prize press release acknowledged:

    “Prostaglandins are continuously formed in the stomach, where they prevent the tissue from being damaged by the hydrochloric acid. If the formation of prostaglandins is blocked a peptic ulcer can rapidly be formed.”

    As a consequence of the 1982 Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology, scientists and healthcare providers have a much better understanding of the mechanisms of how aspirin and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs reduce pain, but also increase the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding and kidney damage. In an effort to reduce the gastrointestinal bleeding, a new class of NSAIDs, the COX-2 inhibitors, was developed. These drugs are also known as cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors or ‘coxibs’, and the major brand names are Vioxx and Celebrex.

    Cox enzymes convert the omega-6 fatty acid arachidonic acid into the pro-inflammatory pain producer prostaglandin E2 (PGE2).

    Cox enzymes convert the omega-6 fatty acid arachidonic acid into the pro-inflammatory pain producer prostaglandin E2 (PGE2).

    In 2002, a study published in the European Spine Journal reported that of the 55% of whiplash-injured patients with pain 17 years after their injury, 53% of the patients were still using analgesics to manage their pain (7). Of these:

    • 29% used analgesics 2-6 times per week
    • 46% used analgesics 7-30 times per week
    • 17% used analgesics more than 30 times per week

    Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit the genesis of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and subsequently reduce pain, there are problems with habitual consumption of these products in the management of chronic pain syndromes, including the chronic pain that is often observed following whiplash injury (7). Importantly, habitual consumption of NSAIDs for chronic pain conditions has been associated with a number of deleterious health events, including:

    • End stage renal disease (16)
    • Gastrointestinal Bleeding (17, 18)
    • Myocardial infarction (18, 19, 20)
    • Stroke (18, 20)
    • Alzheimer’s and other dementias (21)
    • Hearing loss (22)
    • Erectile dysfunction (23)

    In 2003, the journal Spine published a study stating (24):

    “Adverse reactions to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory (NSAID) medication have been well documented.”

    “Gastrointestinal toxicity induced by NSAIDs is one of the most common serious adverse drug events in the industrialized world.”

    “The newer COX-2-selective NSAIDs are less than perfect, so it is imperative that contraindications be respected.”

    There is “insufficient evidence for the use of NSAIDs to manage chronic low back pain, although they may be somewhat effective for short-term symptomatic relief.”

    In 2006, a study published in Surgical Neurology stated (25):

    “The use of NSAID medications is a well-established effective therapy for both acute and chronic nonspecific neck and back pain.”

    “Extreme complications, including gastric ulcers, bleeding, myocardial infarction, and even deaths, are associated with their [NSAIDs] use.”

    Blockage of the COX enzyme [with NSAIDs] inhibits the conversion of arachidonic acid to the very pro-inflammatory prostaglandins that mediate the classic inflammatory response of pain (dolor), edema (tumor), elevated temperature (calor), and erythema (rubor).

    “More than 70 million NSAID prescriptions are written each year, and 30 billion over-the-counter NSAID tablets are sold annually.”

    “5% to 10% of the adult US population and approximately 14% of the elderly routinely use NSAIDs for pain control.”

    Almost all patients who take the long-term NSAIDs will have gastric hemorrhage, 50% will have dyspepsia, 8% to 20% will have gastric ulceration, 3% of patients develop serious gastrointestinal side effects, which results in more than 100,000 hospitalizations, an estimated 16,500 deaths, and an annual cost to treat the complications that exceeds 1.5 billion dollars.

    “NSAIDs are the most common cause of drug-related morbidity and mortality reported to the FDA and other regulatory agencies around the world.”

    One author referred to the “chronic systemic use of NSAIDs to ‘carpet-bombing,’ with attendant collateral end-stage damage to human organs.”

    COX 2 inhibitors [Celebrex], designed to alleviate the gastric side effects of COX 1 NSAIDs, are “not only associated with an increased incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke but also have no significant improvement in the prevention of gastric ulcers.”

    •••••

    There are effective nontoxic alternatives to NSAIDs in the management of chronic spinal pain. A well-respected physician who is an advocate of these alternative approaches to chronic pain management is Joseph Charles Maroon, MD. Dr. Maroon is a neurosurgeon from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Dr. Maroon specializes in painful degenerative spinal diseases, and he is also the neurosurgeon for Pro Football’s Pittsburgh Steelers.

    Recently (2006 and 2010), Dr. Maroon has published two studies and one book on the efficacy of natural anti-inflammatory agents for pain relief (25, 26, 27). The effective products Dr. Maroon details include:

    Omega-3 Essential Fatty Acids (fish oil)

    White willow bark

    Curcumin (turmeric)

    Green tea

    Pycnogenol (maritime pine bark)

    Boswellia serrata resin (Frankincense)

    Resveratrol

    Uncaria tomentosa (cat’s claw)

    Capsaicin (chili pepper)

    In his writings, Dr. Maroon discusses the biological plausibility for the use of each of these products, as well as their therapeutic doses. He particularly emphasizes the viability of omega-3 essential fatty acids, noting that these oils powerfully inhibit the production of both pro-inflammatory prostaglandins and pro-inflammatory leukotrienes. In his 2006 study (25), Dr. Maroon found that he could eliminate pain medication in 59% of his study subjects.

    Other studies also support the utilization of omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil) in an effort to achieve an anti-inflammatory state:

    In 2006, the journal Arthritis Research & Therapy published a study noting that an anti-inflammatory dose of fish oil had to be a minimum of 2,700 g/d of EPA plus DHA (the active anti-inflammatory ingredients in fish oil) (28).

    In 2007, the journal Pain published a study also study noting that an anti-inflammatory dose of fish oil had to be a minimum of 2,700 mg/d of EPA plus DHA (29).

    Both studies (28, 29) indicated that it might take a period of 2-3 months before maximum benefit of fish oil supplementation to be observed.

    In 2010, The Clinical Journal of Pain presented a case series of patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain, including patients injured in whiplash collisions (30). The authors noted that in these more difficult neuropathic pain patients, that more aggressive fish oil supplementation may be required to achieve a good clinical outcome. They suggest doses of EPA plus DHA between 2400-7500 mg/d. Their case series was very successful with these high doses of fish oil, stating:

    “These patients had clinically significant pain reduction, improved function as documented with both subjective and objective outcome measures up to as much as 19 months after treatment initiation.”

    “No serious adverse effects were reported.”

    “This first-ever reported case series suggests that omega-3 fatty acids may be of benefit in the management of patients with neuropathic pain.”

    •••••

    In summary, it is inevitable that some patients injured in motor vehicle collisions will develop chronic pain syndrome. The cause of their chronic pain is rarely psychometric. Rather their pain usually has an organic basis, which includes post-traumatic scarring with persistent inflammation. Inflammation predisposes tissues to pain generation and perception. Management with anti-inflammatory agents makes sense. However, NSAIDs taken for chronic pain syndromes are associated with a number of serious adverse events, including death. There is good evidence that there are a number of alternative natural products for pain management that are both safe and effective, especially omega-3 fish oils. Alternative health care practioners routinely uses these products in the management of chronic pain patients, including those injured in whiplash trauma. The results are improved outcomes, few if any side effects, and great patient satisfaction.

    •••••

    References:

    1) Macnab, I; Acceleration Injuries of the Cervical Spine; Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American); Vol. 46, No. 8, December 1964.

    2) Hodgson SP, Grundy M; Whiplash Injuries: Their Long-term Prognosis and its Relationship to Compensation; Neuro-Orthopedics; No.7, 1989, pp. 88-91.

    3) Berglund A, Alfredsson L, Cassidy JD, Jensen I, Nygren A; The association between exposure to a rear-end collision and future neck or shoulder pain; Journal of Clinical Epidemiology; 2000; 53:1089-1094.

    4) Tomlinson PJ, Gargan MF, Bannister GC. The fluctuation in recovery following whiplash injury: 7.5-year prospective review. Injury. Volume 36, Issue 6, June 2005, Pages 758-761.

    5) Gargan MF, Bannister GC. Long-Term Prognosis of Soft-Tissue Injuries of the Neck. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British); Vol. 72-B, No. 5, September 1990, pp. 901-3.

    6) Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister CG. Soft-tissue Injuries of the Cervical Spine: 15-year Follow-up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British). November 1996, Vol. 78-B, No. 6, pp. 955-7.

    7) Bunketorp L, Nordholm L Carlsson J; A descriptive analysis of disorders in patients 17 years following motor vehicle accidents; European Spine Journal, 11:227-234, June 2002.

    8) Rooker J, Bannister M, Amirfeyz R, B. Squires, M. Gargan, G. Bannister; Whiplash Injury 30-Year follow-up of a single series; Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery – British Volume; 2010; Volume 92-B, Issue 6, pp. 853-855.

    9) Wallis B, Lord S, Bogduk N; Resolution of Psychological Distress of Whiplash Patients Following Treatment by Radiofrequency Neurotomy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial; Pain, October 1997; Vol. 73, No. 1; pp. 15-22.

    10) Gargan MF, Bannister GC. The Comparative Effects of Whiplash Injuries. The Journal of Orthopaedic Medicine, 19(1), 1997, pp. 15-17.

    11) Omoigui S; The biochemical origin of pain: The origin of all pain is inflammation and the inflammatory response: Inflammatory profile of pain syndromes; Medical Hypothesis; 2007, Vol. 69, pp. 1169 – 1178.

    12) Stonebrink, R.D., D.C., “Physiotherapy Guidelines for the Chiropractic Profession,” ACA Journal of Chiropractic, (June1975), Vol. IX, p.65-75.

    13) Boyd, William, M.D., Pathology, Lea & Febiger, (1953).

    14) Cyriax J, Orthopaedic Medicine, Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions, Bailliere Tindall, Vol. 1, (1982).

    15) Majno, Guido and Joris, Isabelle, Cells, Tissues, and Disease: Principles of General Pathology, Oxford University Press, 2004.

    16) Perneger PV, Whelton PK, Klag MJ; Risk of Kidney Failure Associated with the Use of Acetaminophen, Aspirin, and Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs; New Eng J Med, Number 25, Volume 331:1675-1679, December 22, 1994.

    17) Wolfe MM, Lichtenstein DR, Singh, G; Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs; The New England Journal of Medicine June 17, 1999.

    18) Vaithianathan R, Hockey PM, Moore TJ, Bates DW; Iatrogenic Effects of COX-2 Inhibitors in the US Population; Drug Safety 2009; 32 (4): 335-343.

    19) Helin-Salmivaara A, Virtanen A, Vesalainen R, Gronroos JM, Klaukka T, Idanpaan-Heikkila JE, Huupponen R; NSAID use and the risk of hospitalization for first myocardial infarction in the general population: a nationwide case-control study from Finland; European Heart Journal May 26, 2006.

    20) Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Wandel S, Hildebrand P, Tschannen B, Villiger PM, Egger M; Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Network meta-analysis; British Medical Journal; January 11, 2011; Vol. 342:c7086.

    21) Breitner JC, Haneuse SJPA, Walker R, Dublin S, Crane PK, Gray SL, Larson EB, Risk of dementia and AD with prior exposure to NSAIDs in an elderly community-based cohort; Neurology; June 2, 2009; Vol. 72, No. 22; pp. 1899-905.

    22) Curhan SG, Eavey R, Shargorodsky J, Curhan GC; Analgesic Use and the Risk of Hearing Loss in Men; The American Journal of Medicine; March 2010; Vol. 123; No. 3; pp. 231-237.

    23) Gleason JM, Slezak JM, Jung H, Reynolds K, Van Den Eeden SK, Haque R, Quinn VP, Loo RK, Jacobsen SJ; Regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and erectile dysfunction; Journal of Urology; April 11, 2011; Vol. 185; No. 4; pp. 1388-93.

    24) Giles LGF, Muller R; Chronic Spinal Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Medication, Acupuncture, and Spinal Manipulation; Spine; July 15, 2003; 28(14):1490-1502.

    25) Maroon JC, Bost JW; Omega-3 Fatty acids (fish oil) as an anti-inflammatory: an alternative to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for discogenic pain; Surgical Neurology; 65 (April 2006) 326– 331.

    26) Maroon JC, Bost JW, Maroon A; Natural anti-inflammatory agents for pain relief; Surgical Neurological International; December 2010.

    27) Maroon JC; Fish Oil, The Natural Anti-Inflammatory, Basic Health, 2006.

    28) Cleland CG, James MJ, Proudman SM; Fish oil: what the prescriber needs to know; Arthritis Research & Therapy; Volume 8, Issue 1, 2006, p. 402.

    29) Goldberg RJ Katz J; A meta-analysis of the analgesic effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation for inflammatory joint pain; Pain; May 2007, 129(1-2), pp. 210-223.

    30) Ko GD, Nowacki NB, Arseneau L, Eitel M, Hum A; Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Neuropathic Pain: Case Series; The Clinical Journal of Pain; February 2010, Vol. 26, No, 2, pp 168-172.

  • Cervical Spine Injury and  Clinical Instability

    Cervical Spine Injury and Clinical Instability

    Whiplash injury is an inertial mechanical injury. Consequently, chiropractors, as a consequence of the mechanical nature of their clinical practice, treat many whiplash-injured patients. Although chiropractors manage a wide range of clinical syndromes and findings, the emphasis of chiropractic clinical practice is to treat, primarily through spinal adjusting, regions of spinal hypomobility (less than normal motion). However, chiropractors are well aware that spinal trauma may also cause regions of hypermobility (excessive motion).

    In the evaluation of an injured patient, chiropractors assess the spine for both hypomobility and hypermobility.

    Hypomobility is classically managed with spinal adjusting, myotherapy, stretching exercises, and modalities that reduce spasm.

    Hypermobility is classically managed by applying spinal adjusting to adjacent hypomobile joints, varying forms of immobilization, and resistive effort exercises.

    Chiropractors are aware that trauma, especially whiplash trauma, can result in a risk to the integrity of the nervous system. This type of hypermobility is referred to as Clinical Instability. Clinical Instability management may require prolonged immobilization, or on occasion a surgical stabilization. This paper reviews the historical and contemporary perspectives on Clinical Instability.

    •••••

    Clinical Instability was first defined by Augustas A. White, MD, and Manohar M. Panjabi, PhD. Dr. White is Professor of Orthopedic Surgery at Harvard Medical School, as well as Orthopedic Surgeon-in-Chief at Beth Israel Hospital in Boston. Dr. Panjabi is Professor of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation at Yale University School of Medicine.

    In the Second Edition (1990) of their authoritative text, Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, they define clinical instability as (8):

    Clinical Instability is the loss of the ability of the spine under physiologic loads to maintain its pattern of displacement so that there is no initial or additional neurological deficit, no matter major deformity, and no incapacitating pain.”

    White and Panjabi also state:

    “The major practical consideration in the determination of clinical instability is the evaluation of the patient’s radiographs.”

    “Radiographic examination is the most often used objective means of determining the relative positions of the vertebrae in a potentially unstable spine. Therefore, it is important to give some consideration to the accurate interpretation of linear radiographic measurements.”

    •••••

    The radiographic evaluation primarily involves the lateral cervical views, beginning with the neutral lateral cervical x-ray. The first picture below is a representative lateral cervical view with the patient facing to the left. According to radiologist Amil Gerlock, MD, and colleagues, the structural integrity of the lateral cervical radiograph is best visualized by adding four contour lines (second picture below), as follows (9):

    1) The line drawn on the anterior margins of the vertebral bodies. This line should be a smooth and gentle curve, convex anteriorly.

    2) The line drawn on the posterior margins of the vertebral bodies. This line should also be a smooth and gentle curve, convex anteriorly. This line represents the anterior margin of the spinal canal, where the spinal cord resides.

    3) The line drawn on the bases of the spinous processes. This is also known as the spinolaminal line. This line should also be a smooth and gentle curve, convex anteriorly. This line represents the posterior margin of the spinal canal, where the spinal cord resides.

    4) The line drawn on the tips of the spinous processes from C2 to C7. This line should also be a smooth and gentle curve, convex anteriorly. This line represents the anterior margin of the spinal canal, where the spinal cord resides.

    Any break in the smooth continuity of any of these lines is an indication of soft-tissue injury and the potential for clinical instability.

    The line drawn on the tips of the spinous processes from C2 to C7. This line should also be a smooth and gentle curve, convex anteriorly. This line represents the anterior margin of the spinal canal, where the spinal cord resides.

    In March 2009, the journal Sports Biomechanics published a study using a detailed three-dimensional finite element model of the human cervical spine to study flexion and extension injuries to the cervical spine. The authors, Abraham Tchako and Ali Sadegh, are mechanical engineers from Union College in New York and City University of New York. The article is titled (1):

    A cervical spine model to predict injury scenarios and clinical instability

    The authors were able to establish that motor vehicle injuries to the cervical spine can cause clinical instability. However, they also note that cervical spine clinical instability cannot be documented with a clinical examination, and that specific imaging studies are required.

    The authors note that the standard for the assessment of clinical instability was established by Augustas A. White, MD, and Manohar M. Panjabi, PhD. Dr. White is Professor of Orthopedic Surgery at Harvard Medical School, as well as Orthopedic Surgeon-in-Chief at Beth Israel Hospital in Boston. Dr. Panjabi is Professor of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation at Yale University School of Medicine.

    These authors also state:

    “The cervical discs are relatively small compared with the discs in the other parts of the spinal column. Consequently, the exiting space for the nerves is also small, which means that even a small abnormal disc material displacement may encroach on the nerve and cause significant pain.”

    “Some radiologists in the US consider a 2-mm anterior displacement to be the average displacement for instability.”

    “Clinical studies have shown that about 35% of cases of herniated discs in the cervical spine go undetected.”

    •••••

    From a clinical and medical-legal perspective, clinical instability is quite important. Clinical instability implies substantial injury, poor recovery, impairment and disability. One study notes that up to 30% of those with clinical instability “may suffer permanent neurologic sequelae (2).”

    The primary motor vehicle collision injury is to the facet joint capsules (3), and facet injury alone can cause clinical instability (7). However, it is established that the injury can extend to involve the intervertebral disc (4), and also the anterior longitudinal ligament (5). Injuries to the intervertebral disc and anterior longitudinal ligament are more serious than facet capsular injuries, and are much more likely to result in clinical instability.

    Historically, clinical instability is assessed with stress radiography. In the cervical spine, this typically includes neutral lateral cervical, maximum flexion lateral cervical, and maximum extension lateral cervical x-rays. In 2003, Spine published an article titled (6):

    Increased sagittal plane segmental motion in the lower cervical spine in women with chronic whiplash-associated disorders, grades I-II: a case-control study using a new measurement protocol

    This article states:

    “Flexion-extension radiography has been in clinical use for over 50 years to detect abnormal segmental motions in the spine.”

    •••••

    As noted above, Harvard’s Augustas White, MD, and Yale’s Manohar Panjabi, PhD, established the standard for the assessment of clinical instability. Their initial article was published in the journal Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research in June, 1975, and titled (7):

    Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine

    In this paper, the authors performed detailed experiments and analysis of the effects of destroying ligaments and facets on the stability of the cervical spine below C2. Their primary protocol involved analysis of maximum flexion and extension x-rays. They note that cervical spine muscles do not play a significant role in clinical stability; rather clinical stability is primarily as a consequence of ligamentous integrity.

    In their biomechanical analysis, White and Panjabi state:

    “If acute horizontal displacements exceeding 3.5 mm are found on standard [neutral] lateral roentgenograms of the neck in the acutely injured adult population, this motion can be considered as abnormal and indicates that the spine is unstable.”

    “If acute horizontal displacements exceeding 3.5 mm are found on standard [neutral] lateral roentgenograms of the neck in the acutely injured adult population, this motion can be considered as abnormal and indicates that the spine is unstable.”

    In addition, White and Panjabi state:

    “If there is angulation of the vertebrae in question that is more than 11 degrees greater than the angulation of either normal adjacent vertebrae then the excessively rotated vertebrae is unstable.”

    “If there is angulation of the vertebrae in question that is more than 11 degrees greater than the angulation of either normal adjacent vertebrae then the excessively rotated vertebrae is unstable.”

    White and Panjabi emphasize the importance of the integrity of the facet joints, stating:

    “The prospect of clinical instability in horizontal translation is significantly greater following the loss of the functional integrity of the facets.”

    White and Panjabi summarize their work by stating that if either of these two conditions exist, the spine is “unstable or on the brink of instability:

    1) “More than 3.5 mm horizontal displacement of one vertebrae in relation to an adjacent vertebrae, anteriorly or posteriorly, measured on resting [neutral] lateral or flexion-extension roentgenograms of the spine.”

    2) “More than 11 degree of rotational differences to that of either adjacent vertebrae, measured on a resting [neutral] lateral or flexion-extension roentgenogram.”

    •••••

    Although Augustas White, MD, and Manohar Panjabi, PhD, first described the evaluation of clinical instability in 1975 (7), their core analysis remained unchanged 15 years later when they published the Second Edition (1990) of their authoritative text, Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. In the past 20 years, since 1990, there have been a few updates as to the assessment of clinical instability that vary slightly from the original work of White and Panjabi, as follows:

    • In 2009, researchers from the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukui University, Japan, list four criteria as being indicative of spinal clinical instability (10):

    1) Cervical spine kyphotic deformity of > 10 degrees. This criterion was not included in the original work of White and Panjabi.

    2) A cervical disc angle of anterior rotation > 10 degrees. This is slightly different than the original analysis of White and Panjabi. White and Panjabi measured the angle formed between two adjacent inferior vertebral body end plates; these authors measured the actual disc angle.

    3) Anterior vertebral translation of 3 mm. The analysis is identical to the original work of White and Panjabi, but they reduced the threshold from 3.5 mm to 3 mm.

    4) They add reversed dynamic canal stenosis to less than 12 mm as being indicative of spinal clinical instability. This criterion was not included in the original work of White and Panjabi.

    clinical instability

    • In 2001, researchers from Wayne State University School of Medicine in Dayton, Ohio, published a study indicating that the protocols set forth by White and Panjabi could miss some clinically important cases of cervical spine clinical instability (2). Their study indicates that an improved method of investigation involves dynamic fluoroscopy (motion x-rays) with lateral cervical flexion/extension views. Their study was published in the journal Current Surgery.

    • Researchers from Nova Southeastern University College of Medicine in Winter Springs, Florida have published a number of studies indicating that the most effective way to assess clinical instability and other injuries following whiplash trauma involves the utilization of kinematic cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (11, 12, 13). The protocols they describe involve the use of flexion/extension motion MRI of the cervical spine.

    •••••

    On July 29, 2010, Malik Slosberg, Dc, MS, published a review article

    titled (14):

    How Spinal Manipulation Activates Segmental Stabilization of the Spine

    Dr. Slosberg is a full professor at Life Chiropractic College West in

    Hayward, California. In this article, Dr. Slosberg documents the following model of how chiropractic adjusting can improve segmental spinal instability:

    Tissue injury and pain results in reflex inhibition and progressive atrophy of the segmental multifidus muscle.

    The chiropractic adjustment rapidly stretches ligaments, joint capsules and intervertebral discs, stimulating stretch receptors, and initiating a ligamentomuscular reflex, which activates the segmental multifidus to stabilize and protect passive ligamentous restraints from injury.

    The segmental multifidus that has been reflexly inhibited and atrophying is stimulated to contract.

    This may reverse the reflex inhibition, progressive atrophy, and delayed muscle response in the segmental multifidus, and restore contractility and improve dynamic joint function.

    The key concept from Dr. Slosberg is that chiropractic spinal adjusting can improve spinal segmental instability as a consequence of activating the multifidus muscle.

    •••••

    Spinal clinical instability is a concept that is well understood by chiropractors. All spinal trauma patients, especially whiplash trauma patients, should be assessed for spinal clinical instability. For decades, this assessment has been done primarily by using maximum flexion and maximum extension lateral cervical x-rays, and this service is routinely performed on spine trauma patients by chiropractors. For clinical reasons, some patients may need additional assessment, more than dynamic radiography. In these cases, it is suggested that the patient be referred for either dynamic fluoroscopy or dynamic MRI.

    Spinal clinical instability patients have greater injury and a worse prognosis for complete recovery. Chiropractors have a number of conservative approaches in the management of the spinal clinical instability patient. If appropriate improvement is not obtained within a reasonable timeframe with conservative management, these patients can be referred for a surgical stabilization consultation.

    REFERENCES

    1) Tchako A, Sadegh A. A cervical spine model to predict injury scenarios and clinical instability; Sports Biomechanics, March 1009; 8(1): 78-95.

    2) Cox MW, McCarthy M, Lemmon G, Wenker J. Cervical spine instability: clearance using dynamic fluoroscopy. Current Surgery. January 2001;58(1):96-100.

    3) Pearson AM, Ivancic PC, Ito S, Panjabi MM. Facet joint kinematics and injury mechanisms during simulated whiplash. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):390-7.

    4) Panjabi MM, Ito S, Pearson AM, Ivancic PC. Injury mechanisms of the cervical intervertebral disc during simulated whiplash. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jun 1;29(11):1217-25.

    5) Ivancic PC, Pearson AM, Panjabi MM, Ito S. Injury of the anterior longitudinal ligament during whiplash simulation. Eur Spine J. 2004 Feb;13(1):61-8.

    6) Kristjansson E, Leivseth G, Brinckmann P, Frobin W. Increased sagittal plane segmental motion in the lower cervical spine in women with chronic whiplash-associated disorders, grades I-II: a case-control study using a new measurement protocol. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 1;28(19):2215-21.

    7) White AA 3rd, Johnson RM, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO. Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;(109):85-96.

    8) White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine; Second Edition, Lippincott, 1990.

    9) Gerlock AJ, Kirchner SG, Heller RM, Kaye JJ. The Cervical Spine in Trauma; Suanders, 1978.

    10) Kenzo Uchida, M.D., Ph.D., Hideaki Nakajima, M.D., Ph.D., Ryuichiro Sato, M.D., Ph.D., Takafum i Yayama, M.D., Ph.D., Erisa S. Mwaka, M.D., Shigeru Kobayashi, M.D., Ph.D., and Hisatoshi Baba, M.D., Ph.D. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Associated with Kyphosis or Sagittal Sigmoid Alignment: Outcome after Anterior or Posterior Decompression; Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine; November 2009, Volume 11, pp. 521-528.

    11) Giuliano V, Giuliano C, Pinto F, Scaglione M. The use of flexion and extension MR in the evaluation of cervical spine trauma: initial experience in 100 trauma patients compared with 100 normal subjects. Emerg Radiol. 2002 Nov;9(5):249-53.

    12) Giuliano V, Giuliano C, Pinto F, Scaglione M. Soft tissue injury protocol (STIP) using motion MRI for cervical spine trauma assessment. Emerg Radiol. 2004 Apr;10(5):241-5.

    13) Giuliano V, Pinto A, Scaglione M. Kinematic cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging in low-impact trauma assessment. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. June 2009 ;30(3):168-73.

    14) Slosberg M. How Spinal Manipulation Activates Segmental Stabilization of the Spine; Dynamic Chiropractic; July 29, 2010.

  • Knees: Chiropractic Biomechanical Applications Nutritional Support

    Knees: Chiropractic Biomechanical Applications Nutritional Support

    In 1982, Richard Rothman, MD, PhD and Frederick Simeone, MD, published the second edition of their book The Spine (1). Chapter 2 of the book is titled (2):

    “Applied Anatomy of the Spine”

    Anatomist Wesley Parke, PhD, writes this chapter, stating:

    “Although the 23 or 24 individual motor segments must be considered in relation to the spinal column as a whole, no congenital or acquired disorder of a single major component of a unit can exist without affecting first the functions of the other components of the same unit and then the functions of other levels of the spine.”

    The concept of the entire spine acting as a single integrated functioning entity is further supported by the reference text written by rheumatologist John Bland, MD, in his 1987 text (3):

    Disorders of the Cervical Spine

    Dr. Bland is a Professor of Medicine at the University of Vermont College of Medicine. Dr. Bland writes:

    “We tend to divide the examination of the spine into regions: cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine clinical studies. This is a mistake. The three units are closely interrelated structurally and functionally – a whole person with a whole spine. The cervical spine may be symptomatic because of a thoracic or lumbar spine abnormality, and vice versa! Sometimes treating a lumbar spine will relieve a cervical spine syndrome, or proper management of cervical spine will relieve low backache.”

    I believe that the point of Dr. Parke’s and Dr. Bland’s comments is that the entire spinal column is an integrated functioning unit. It is also important to acknowledge that structures below the spine, specifically the feet, ankles, knees and hips also influence spinal biomechanical function and health. This point is very well detailed in the books by Janet Travell, MD and David Simons, MD (4, 5, 6).

    The biomechanical base for human upright posture is the foot. Foot pronation or the presence of a Morton’s Toe (7) does influence the biomechanical function and health of the ankle, knee, hip, pelvis and spine. Lower limb functional and/or biomechanical problems are known to impact knee biomechanics and risks for development of osteoarthritis (8, 9).

    Yvonne Golightly, PT, PhD, from the University of North Carolina School of Medicine notes that 6% of the US adult population suffer from knee osteoarthritis (8). She states:

    “Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common chronic conditions in the United States and a leading cause of disability among older adults.”

    A recent (01/01/2014) search of the National Library of Medicine using the PubMed search engine with the words “arthroscopic knee surgery” locates 4,621 articles. Clearly, arthroscopic surgery is the primary intervention for knee osteoarthritis in the United States, and it has been for decades.

    •••••••••

    In 1996, orthopedic surgeon J Bruce Moseley, MD, and colleagues published the results of a small pilot study (n=10) pertaining to arthroscopic treatment of knee osteoarthritis (10). Dr. Moseley is from the Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center at Baylor College of Medicine. Their article was published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine, and titled:

    Arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee:
    A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
    Results of a pilot study

    The purpose of this study was to determine if a placebo effect might play a role in arthroscopic treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Five subjects were randomized to a placebo arthroscopy group, three subjects were randomized to an arthroscopic lavage group, and two subjects were randomized to a standard arthroscopic debridement group. The physicians performing the postoperative assessment and the patients remained blinded as to treatment.

    Incredibly, patients who received the placebo surgery reported decreased frequency, intensity, and duration of knee pain. They also thought that the procedure was worthwhile and would recommend it to family and friends. The authors concluded, “there may be a significant placebo effect for arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.” As a consequence of the small number of subjects in this study, little controversy was generated; that was soon to change.

    •••••••••

    Seven years later, in 2002, Dr. Moseley and colleagues presented the results of a much larger study in the New England Journal of Medicine, titled (11):

    A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee

    The authors conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A total of 180 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned to receive arthroscopic debridement, arthroscopic lavage, or placebo surgery. Patients in the placebo group received skin incisions and underwent a simulated debridement without insertion of the arthroscope.

    Patients and assessors of outcome were blinded to the treatment-group assignment. Outcomes were assessed at multiple points (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months) over a 2-year period with the use of five self-reported scores–three on scales for pain and two on scales for function–and one objective test of walking and stair climbing. Incredibly, the authors found:

    “At no point did either of the intervention groups report less pain or better function than the placebo group.”

    “In this controlled trial involving patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, the outcomes after arthroscopic lavage or arthroscopic debridement were no better than those after a placebo procedure.”

    These authors quantify arthroscopic knee surgery. They note that “more than 650,000 such procedures are performed each year at a cost of roughly $5,000 each.” Yet, there is no evidence that arthroscopy cures or arrests knee osteoarthritis. At no point did either the lavage group or the debridement group have greater pain relief than the placebo group. At no time did the lavage group or the debridement group have greater improvement in function than the placebo group. Objectively measured walking and stair climbing were poorer in the debridement group than in the placebo group at 2 weeks and 1 year and showed a trend toward worse functioning at 2 years.

    This study provides strong evidence that arthroscopic lavage with or without debridement is not better than a placebo procedure in improving knee pain and function. The authors conclude:

    “Indeed, at some points during follow-up, objective function was significantly worse in the debridement group than in the placebo group.”

    “If the efficacy of arthroscopic lavage or debridement in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee is no greater than that of placebo surgery, the billions of dollars spent on such procedures annually might be put to better use.”

    In contrast to their prior study (1996), this study triggered multiple letters-to-the-editor, articles, and an official editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine (12). Newspapers throughout the world wrote stories on the study’s results, including a front-page article in the New York Times (13). The editorial from the New England Journal of Medicine makes the following points:

    “Malaligned knees may not respond well to arthroscopic debridement.”

    “Despite their current popularity, lavage and debridement are probably not efficacious as treatments for most persons with osteoarthritis of the knee.”

    “Although the debris in osteoarthritic joints may be related to synovitis, the results of this trial suggest that the effects of this debris on clinical symptoms are negligible.”

    “Although smoothing cartilage and meniscal irregularities may sound appealing, larger forces within and outside the joint environment, such as malalignment, muscle weakness, instability, and obesity, which are not addressed by this type of surgery, may have greater effects on the clinical outcomes of osteoarthritis of the knee.”

    “Debridement and lavage may simply remove some of the evidence while the destructive forces of osteoarthritis continue to work.”

    Importantly, these authors indicate that the primary factors in knee osteoarthritis pathophysiology, which arthroscopic surgery does not address, include mal-alignment, muscle weakness, instability, and obesity. These are problems commonly addressed in chiropractic clinical practice.

    Joseph Bernstein, MD is an assistant professor of orthopedic surgery, University of Pennsylvania. In 2003, Dr. Burnstein and colleague do an extensive review of Moseley and colleagues, publishing in the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine (14). They note:

    “Arthroscopy for degenerative conditions of the knee is among the most commonly employed orthopedic procedures, but its effectiveness (like the effectiveness of many surgical operations) has never been proven in prospective trials.”

    Dr. Bernstein notes that Moseley’s study has an important strength, the inclusion of a sham treatment—a rarity in surgical studies. He notes that the “challenge is now made for researchers to repeat the Moseley methodology.” As we will see below, this has been done.

    •••••••••

    In January 2008, the Cochrane Database did an extensive review of the literature to identify the effectiveness of arthroscopic debridement in the management of knee osteoarthritis (15). Specifically, the authors evaluated the effectiveness of arthroscopic debridement on knee pain relief and improved knee function. The author’s conclusion was:

    “There is ‘gold’ level evidence that AD has no benefit for undiscriminated OA (mechanical or inflammatory causes).”

    •••••••••

    In September of 2008, Alexandra Kirkley, M.D., and colleagues published an article in the New England Journal of Medicine, titled (16):

    A Randomized Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

    The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Patients were randomly assigned to surgical lavage and arthroscopic debridement together with optimized physical and medical therapy (n=86) or to treatment with physical and medical therapy alone (n=86). Each group was re-evaluated at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The authors make these comments:

    “Although arthroscopic surgery has been widely used for osteoarthritis of the knee, scientific evidence to support its efficacy is lacking.”

    “Arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee provides no additional benefit to optimized physical and medical therapy.”

    “This study failed to show a benefit of arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. At the end of 2 years, patients assigned to arthroscopic treatment in addition to optimized physical and medical therapy had no greater improvement in [] scores than did those who received only physical and medical therapy.”

    “The results of this randomized, controlled trial show that arthroscopic surgery provides no additional benefit to optimized physical and medical therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.”

    This study by Dr. Kirkley and colleagues generated a follow-up article that was published in NATURE: CLINICAL PRACTICE: Rheumatology, and titled (17):

    Is arthroscopic surgery a beneficial treatment for knee osteoarthritis?

    The author, Dr. Richard Nutton, from the Department of Orthopedics and Trauma at the University of Edinburgh, notes (from abstract):

    “Considering the high prevalence of knee osteoarthritis and the relatively common use of arthroscopy to treat this condition, few well-designed studies have been published on the effectiveness of arthroscopy for treating knee osteoarthritis. The study by Kirkley et al. is a welcome addition to the literature as it addresses many of the criticisms of previous work by using appropriate exclusion criteria, standardizing treatment in the study groups, using well-validated clinical scores, and providing a period of follow-up exceeding 2 years. The authors conclude that although all patients benefited from active treatment for knee osteoarthritis, comprising rehabilitation and optimized medical treatment, the addition of arthroscopic debridement of the knee did not improve outcomes. These results underline the outcome of a previous prospective, randomized trial [the Moseley study, reference #11], which concluded that the placebo effect of performing knee arthroscopy for osteoarthritis accounted for the main therapeutic benefit observed at follow-up.”

    •••••••••

    Stephen Howell, MD, is a clinician, researcher, and innovator in the fields of total knee replacement, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and meniscal injury. His clinical practice focuses on the treatment of degenerative processes and sports-related injuries to the knee. Dr. Howell performs over 350 total knee replacements and 100 ACL reconstructions per year. He is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering Department at University California at Davis. He is President of the International ACL Study Group, and he is on the editorial board of the American Journal of Sports Medicine and Knee Journal. In September 2010, Dr. Howell published an article in the journal Orthopedics, titled (18):

    The role of arthroscopy in treating osteoarthritis of the knee in the older patient

    Despite being one of the world’s best known and busiest knee surgeons, Dr. Howell notes (from abstract):

    “Arthroscopy of the osteoarthritic knee is a common and costly practice with limited and specific indications.”

    “The extent of osteoarthritis (OA) is determined by joint space narrowing, which is best measured on a weight-bearing radiograph of the knee in 30° or 45° of flexion.”

    “Randomized controlled trials of patients with joint space narrowing have shown that outcomes after arthroscopic lavage or debridement are no better than those after a sham procedure (placebo effect), and that arthroscopic surgery provides no additional benefit to physical and medical therapy.”

    “The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons guideline on the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (2008) recommended against performing arthroscopy with a primary diagnosis of OA of the knee.”

    “There is no evidence that removal of loose debris, cartilage flaps, torn meniscal fragments, and inflammatory enzymes have any pain relief or functional benefit in patients that have joint space narrowing on standing radiographs. Many patients with joint space narrowing are older with multiple medical comorbidities.”

    “Consider the complications and consequences when recommending arthroscopy to treat the painful osteoarthritic knee without mechanical symptoms, as there is no proven clinical benefit.”

    •••••••••

    The most recent article evaluating knee arthroscopic surgery is only a week old (published 12/26/13). Raine Sihvonen, MD, and colleagues from the Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study (FIDELITY) Group published their study in the New England Journal of Medicine, titled (19):

    Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear

    The authors conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in 146 patients 35 to 65 years of age who had knee symptoms consistent with a degenerative medial meniscus tear and no knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or sham surgery.

    The authors note that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is one of the most common orthopedic procedures, yet rigorous evidence of its efficacy is lacking. These authors found that there were no significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 12 months in any primary outcome. Likewise, there were no significant differences between groups in the number of patients who required subsequent knee surgery. Their conclusion was:

    “In this trial involving patients without knee osteoarthritis but with symptoms of a degenerative medial meniscus tear, the outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were no better than those after a sham surgical procedure.”

    •••••••••

    On the same day that Dr. Sihvonen and colleagues published their study in the New England Journal of Medicine (12/36/13), Rachelle Buchbinder, PhD, and colleagues published a study in the journal Current Opinion in Rheumatology, titled (20):

    Knee osteoarthritis and role for surgical intervention: Lessons learned from randomized clinical trials and population-based cohorts

    Dr. Buchbinder is an Australian Clinical Epidemiologist, and she has been the Director of the Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology. The purpose of their study was to determine if the key findings from the best available studies pertaining to arthroscopic surgery to treat knee osteoarthritis has resulted in better evidence-based care. Their conclusions include:

    “Use of arthroscopy to treat knee osteoarthritis has not declined despite strong evidence-based recommendations that do not sanction its use.”

    “More efforts are needed to overcome significant evidence-practice gaps in the surgical management of knee osteoarthritis, particularly arthroscopy.”

    I believe these studies present an opportunity for practitioners of non-surgical interventions to help patients with knee osteoarthritis.

    •••••••••

    Non-Surgical Management Approaches

    In light of the above evidence, it is clear that effective non-surgical approaches to the management of knee osteoarthritis are necessary. A few such approaches are reviewed below.

    LASER

    A recent (01/02/2014) search of the National Library of Medicine using the PubMed search engine with the words “low level laser AND knee” locates 75 articles. These studies used a variety of laser wavelengths, power, and joules. The bulk of these studies found low-level laser therapy to be effective for pain relief and functional improvement.

    In one study, pertaining to knee osteoarthritis in animals, the authors were able to show that a low-powered red laser was able to enhance knee cartilage regeneration (21). A 632 nm red laser was applied over the arthritic knee for 15 minutes, three times per week, for 8 weeks to achieve the clinical improvement.

    OMEGA-3s

    In 2002, the journal Arthritis & Rheumatism published a study titled (22):

    Pathologic indicators of degradation and inflammation in human osteoarthritic cartilage are abrogated by exposure to n-3 fatty acids

    These authors exposed human cartilage to omega-3 fatty acid concentrations at levels that are achievable in human serum and are physiologically relevant. Study results led them to state:

    “Clinical studies on dietary supplementation with n-3 (omega- 3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as those present in fish oils, have demonstrated modulation of inflammatory symptoms involved in the pathogenesis of arthritis.”

    “These studies show that the pathologic indicators manifested in human osteoarthritis cartilage can be significantly altered by exposure of the cartilage to n-3 PUFA, but not to other classes of fatty acids.”

    “Dietary supplementation with n-3 PUFA may prove useful in both quiescent and active arthritis.”

    “Our findings support the results of epidemiologic and clinical studies that have demonstrated dietary supplementation with n-3 PUFAs to be beneficial in reducing pain and inflammation in human arthritic diseases.”

    “It has long been recognized that dietary supplementation with fish oils that are enriched with n-3 PUFAs can provide benefit in the treatment of arthritis.”

    More recently, in 2012, a study published in the journal Nature Reviews Rheumatology and titled (23):

    Omega‑3 fatty acids and synovitis in osteoarthritic knees

    The authors review the literature on the associations between synovitis, cartilage damage and plasma levels of omega‑3 and omega‑6 fatty acids in patients with osteoarthritis. They conclude that treatment with omega-3 fatty acids “has the poten­tial to play a key part in the management of patients with osteoarthritis.”

    CHIROPRACTIC

    In an extensive review, physicians Susan Garstang and Todd Stitik published an article in the American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, titled (24):

    Osteoarthritis:
    Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Pathophysiology

    These authors note that osteoarthritis affects the majority of adults over age 55, and 58% of those older than 70 years have symptomatic osteoarthritis. They note there are systemic and local risk factors for the development and management of osteoarthritis.

    The local factors “result in abnormal biomechanical loading of affected joints.” The most important of the joint biomechanical factors include:

    • ligamentous laxity
    • malalignment
    • impaired proprioception
    • muscle weakness
    • reduced or altered joint movement parameters

    Importantly, these local factors are the exact components of the joint dysfunction that chiropractors refer to as a “subluxation.” Components of the subluxation include altered alignment, altered movement, muscle atrophy, reduced range of joint motion and aberrant proprioception. These components of the subluxation are the same factors that this article associates with an increased risk of osteoarthritis.

    Furthermore, registered physical therapist Darlene Hertling and physician Randolph Kessler did an excellent job in describing the mechanical pathoanatomy/pathophysiology of knee (and other articulations) osteoarthritis in their 1990 book titled (25):

    Management of Common Musculoskeletal Disorders:
    Physical Therapy Principles and Methods
    Second Edition; Lippincott; 1990

    These authors review the case of a boy who continued to use his knee in the absence of normal external rotation of the tibia on the femur during knee extension. One and a half years later, at surgery, dimpling of the articular cartilage of the medial femoral condyle was observable with the naked eye, presumably owing to continued abnormal compression of this portion of the articular surface from loss of normal arthrokinematic movement. They state:

    “The traditional approach to management of patients presenting with loss of pain-free movement at a joint usually involves various modes of pain relief, active and passive measures to improve osteokinematic movement, and encouragement of normal use of the part.”

    “It should be clear that this approach is inadequate and perhaps dangerous. First, it ignores the basic problem, which is often loss of normal arthrokinematics. Second, it involves considerable forcing of osteokinematic movements in the absence of normal arthrokinematic movement, which may only occur at the expense of the articular cartilage.”

    “A more logical approach to the management of these patients emphasizes the restoration of joint play to allow free movement between bones. This can be achieved only by (1) evaluating to determine the nature and extent of the lesion, (2) deciding if joint mobilization is indicated based on the evaluation, (3) choosing the appropriate techniques based on the direction and extent of restrictions, and (4) skillfully applying techniques of specific mobilization.”

    “Efforts to relieve pain and reduce muscle guarding are, of course, important adjuncts to treatment but do not in themselves constitute a treatment program. Also, some movement should be encouraged in the cardinal planes, but only as normal kinematics are restored.”

    “To a certain extent, functional use of the part should be restricted through careful instructions to the patient until normal joint mechanics are restored. This approach minimizes the possible danger of undue stresses to the articular cartilage during attempts to restore movement. It also minimizes the possibility of discharging a patient who has relatively pain-free functional use of the joint, but who may have some residual kinematic disturbance sufficient to cause cartilage fatigue over time and perhaps osteoarthrosis in later years.”

    SUMMARY

    Knee osteoarthritis can occur as a consequence of neuromechanical problems with the feet, ankles, hips, and spine. In turn, knee neuromechanical problems influence the physiology of the feet, ankles, hips and spine. Neuromechanically, the entire body is linked; a neuromechanical problem any place in the kinetic chain affects the entire body.

    There is little doubt that most individuals with knee osteoarthritis should consider arthroscopic surgery only after other approaches have failed. Our clinical management of these patients is consistent with the studies presented here. They include:

    • Whole body segmental and postural analysis and chiropractic adjustments.
    • Knee alignment improvement, classically with foot orthotics and chiropractic adjusting.
    • Knee exercise, specific to found muscle weaknesses.
    • Low-level laser therapy.
    • Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation.
    • Weight loss strategies.

    References

    1. Rothman RH and Simeone FA, The Spine, second edition, WB Saunders Company, 1982.
    2. Parke WW, “Applied Anatomy of the Spine” chapter 2 in Rothman and Simeone, The Spine, second edition, WB Saunders Company, 1982.
    3. Bland J, Disorders of the Cervical Spine, WB Saunders Company, 1987.
    4. Travell J, Simons D; Myofascial pain and dysfunction, the trigger point manual; New York: Williams & Wilkins, 1983.
    5. Travell J, Simons D; Myofascial pain and dysfunction, the trigger point manual: THE LOWER EXTREMITIES; New York: Williams & Wilkins, 1992.
    6. Simons D, Travell J; Travell & Simons’, Myofascial pain and dysfunction, the trigger point manual: Volume 1, Upper Half of Body; Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1999.
    7. Morton DJ; METATARSUS ATAVICUS: The Identification of a Distinctive Type of Foot Disorder; J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1927 Jul 1;9(3):531-544.
    8. Golightly YM, Tate JJ, Burns CB, Gross MT; Changes in Pain and Disability Secondary to Shoe Lift Intervention in Subjects With Limb Length Inequality and Chronic Low Back Pain; Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy; Vol. 37, No. 7, July 2007, pp. 380-388.
    9. Harvey WF, Yang M, Cooke TDV, Segal N, Lane N, Lewis CE, Felson DT; Associations of Leg length Inequality With Prevalent, Incident, and Progressive Knee Osteoarthritis; Annals of Internal Medicine; March 2, 2010; 152(5): pp. 287–295.
    10. Moseley JB, Wray NP, Kuykendall D, Willis K, Landon G; Arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Results of a pilot study; Am J Sports Med. 1996 Jan-Feb;24(1):28-34.
    11. Moseley JB, O’Malley K, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, Brody BA, Kuykendall DH, Hollingsworth JC, Ashton CM, Wray NP; A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee; N Engl J Med 2002 Jul 11;347(2):81-8.
    12. Felson DT, Buckwalter J; Debridement and lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee; N Engl J Med. 2002 Jul 11;347(2):132-3.
    13. Wald ML; Arthritis surgery in ailing knees is cited as sham. New York Times 2002 Jul 11;Sect. A:1 (col. 6).
    14. Bernstein K, Quach BS; A PERSPECTIVE ON THE STUDY OF MOSELEY ET AL:Questioning the value of arthroscopic knee surgery for osteoarthritis; CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE; Vol. 70; No. 5; May 2003; pp. 401–410.
    15. Laupattarakasem W, Laopaiboon M, Laupattarakasem P, Sumananont C; Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis; Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1).
    16. Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, Giffin JR, Willits KR, Wong CJ, Feagan BG, Donner A, Griffin SH, D’Ascanio LM, Pope JE, Fowler PJ; A Randomized Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee; September 11, 2008; Vol. 359; No. 11; pp. 1097-1107.
    17. Nutton RW; Is arthroscopic surgery a beneficial treatment for knee osteoarthritis?; Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;5(3):122-3.
    18. Howell SM; The role of arthroscopy in treating osteoarthritis of the knee in the older patient; Orthopedics; 2010 Sep 7;33(9):652.
    19. Sihvonen R, Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Itälä A, Joukainen A, Nurmi H, Kalske J, Järvinen TNL; Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear; New England Journal of Medicine; 2013 Dec 26;369(26):2515-24.
    20. Buchbinder R, Richards B, Harris I; Knee osteoarthritis and role for surgical intervention: lessons learned from randomized clinical trials and population-based cohorts; Current Opinion in Rheumatology; 2013 Dec 26. [Epub ahead of print].
    21. Lin YS, Huang MH, Chai CY, Yang, RC; Effects of Helium-Neon Laser on Levels of Stress Protein and Arthritic Histopathology in Experimental Osteoarthritis; American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 83(10):758-765, October 2004.
    22. Curtis CL, Rees SG, Little CB, Flannery CR, Hughes CE, Wilson C, Colin M, Dent CM, Otterness IG, Harwood JL; Pathologic indicators of degradation and inflammation in human osteoarthritic cartilage are abrogated by exposure to n-3 fatty acids; Arthritis & Rheumatism; Volume 46; Issue 6; 2002; pgs. 1544-1553.
    23. Cleland LG, James MJ; Omega‑3 fatty acids and synovitis in osteoarthritic knees; Nature Reviews Rheumatology; April 2012; Vol. 8; No. 6; pp. 314-315.
    24. Garstang SV, Stitik TP; Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Pathophysiology; American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; November 2006, Vol. 85, No. 11, pp. S2-S11.
    25. Hertling D, Kessler RM; Management of Common Musculoskeletal Disorders: Physical Therapy Principles and Methods; Second Edition; Lippincott; 1990.
  • Another Cause of Neck Pain: The Acute Locked Neck Synovial Fold Entrapment Syndrome

    Another Cause of Neck Pain: The Acute Locked Neck Synovial Fold Entrapment Syndrome

    Kim was only nineteen years of age, yet she had already experienced three significant motor vehicle collisions, and in each she suffered injuries. Her injuries were always painful, but never debilitating; there were no fractures, dislocations, radiculopathies, myelopathies, or instabilities. After each collision she was medically evaluated, but there were no radiographs or other types of imaging. Her diagnosis for each was “soft tissue injury” or a “sprain-strain” type of injury. Her treatment was rest, soft collar, heat-pack and pain analgesics. After each injury, she seemed to slowly improve following this management advice.

    About six months after her last injury, Kim was symptomatically much improved but not yet resolved; then she suffered something new and excruciating. While showering, she turned her head to the left to grab the shampoo which initiated a sharp, lightning-bolt sensation in the left side of her neck. After the initial shot of pain, her neck became very stiff and appeared to go into some sort of spasm. There was a lot of pain in her neck and her neck movements were greatly reduced.

    That night Kim’s neck was still very painful and she could not move her neck. In bed she was unable to get comfortable which disturbed her sleep. The next day she was still unimproved, and she once again decided to go to her doctor.

    Kim’s doctor observed a significant right antalgic lean of her cervical spine with significant spasms of her cervical muscles. However, deep tendon reflexes, upper extremity myotomal strength, and upper extremity superficial sensation with pinwheel and light touch were all normal. Once again, no imaging was performed. None-the-less, Kim’s doctor diagnosed her condition as a “pinched nerve” causing muscle spasms. He prescribed muscle relaxers, analgesics, and a white-colored soft cervical collar.

    For the next six weeks, Kim dutifully took her medicines and wore her cervical collar. Yet, she did not appear to be improving. Her neck remained very painful, stiff, and bent at a funny angle. She was finding it nearly impossible to attend her college classes and complete the required assignments. Her sleep was also so poor that she was suffering from sleep deprivation fatigue. Now desperate, Kim decided to see a chiropractor.

    Kim’s chiropractor’s was young, having graduated from school only the year before. His examination also found no problems with strength, sensation, or deep tendon reflexes in the upper or lower extremities. The chiropractor exposed radiographs, and the chief finding was a significant right antalgic lean, consistent with her postural presentation. Happily, the x-rays showed no fractures, degenerative disease, ligamentous instabilities, or any other type of acquired or developmental pathology.

    The chiropractor recommended a treatment of an adjustment “to straighten out the antalgic lean.” Because Kim’s cervical spine was leaning to the right (a right antalgic lean), the adjustment was designed to contact the cervical spine on the left side at the C4 vertebra level (as C4 was the apex of the antalgic lean) while simultaneously contacting the head on the right side; a force was then delivered to the left side of the neck while bringing the head back from right to left; a left sided cervical spine adjustment. It made sense. It seemed logical. Somehow the spine had become stuck, and the adjustment on the left side would straighten it out.

    Kim screamed, loudly, several times. The volume scared the young chiropractor and several of his other patients who were in the office. Kim cried a little because the adjustment hurt very much. It would have been worth it if it would had fixed her problem. But it did not. In fact she felt worse; there was more pain, more spasm, and her neck appeared to be more bent to the right. Her chiropractor did not know what to say or do.

    The next day, Kim’s predicament was unchanged. A week later she was still unchanged, and now desperate. School and work were all but impossible. Both medical and chiropractic had failed to help her. She did not know where to next turn. Her next advice came unsolicited.

    Fatigue and pain had taken its toll on Kim’s appearance; she looked awful for her mere nineteen years of age. A middle-aged woman at the cosmetics counter of a mall anchor store, while assisting Kim with products, inquired about her obvious neck condition (Kim was still wearing her cervical collar). Her recommendation was for Kim to see her chiropractor. In the conversation, Kim shared how her prior chiropractic experience did not help her and actually seemed to make her worse. The woman behind the cosmetic counter assured Kim that her chiropractor was different, smart, experienced, and the best. There was something about the cosmetic counter woman’s voice, mannerisms, and convictions. Desperate, Kim decided to consult the second chiropractor……….

    •••••

    The most recent comprehensive review of the Synovial Fold Entrapment Syndrome is written by Alexandra Webb and colleagues and will be published in the April 2011 issue of the journal Manual Therapy (Epub at this time, 2/15/11) (1).

    In this article, Dr. Webb and colleagues note that intra-articular synovial folds are formed by folds of synovial membrane that project into the joint cavity. Cervical spine synovial folds extend 1–5 mm between the articular surfaces. Synovial folds are found in synovial articulations throughout the vertebral column. Synovial folds in the vertebral column were first documented in 1855.

    Dr. Webb and colleagues note that the published literature uses a number of names to identify these synovial folds, including:

    • “Synovial fold is the most accurate name to apply to these structures.”
    • Meniscus / Menisci
    • Meniscoid
    • Intra-articular inclusions
    • Intra-articular discs

    Anatomically, synovial folds contain an abundant vascular network and sensory nerve fibers (1).

    The entrapment hypothesis is usually proposed to explain the clinical presentations of the synovial fold syndrome. “An abnormal joint movement may cause a synovial fold to move from its normal position at the articular margins to become imprisoned between the articular cartilage surfaces causing pain and articular hypomobility accompanied by reflex muscle spasm (1).”

    “Synovial fold entrapment has been used to explain the pathophysiology of torticollis and the relief of pain and disability following spinal manipulation.” The traction forces generated during manipulation would cause release of a trapped fibro-adipose synovial fold from between the articular surfaces (1).

    Additionally, contusions, rupture and displacement of the synovial folds have been reported at autopsy following fatal motor vehicle trauma; these injuries are not visible at post-mortem using conventional X-ray, CT or MRI (1).

    With repeated mechanical impingement between the articular surfaces, the synovial fold may differentiate into fibrous tissue to varying degrees. The fibrous apex of the synovial indents the articular hyaline cartilage, further entrapping the apex of the synovial fold. Manipulative therapy may traction and separate the articular surfaces apart, releasing the entrapped synovial fold. (Drawing below based on #1).

    With repeated mechanical impingement between the articular surfaces, the synovial fold may differentiate into fibrous tissue to varying degrees. The fibrous apex of the synovial indents the articular hyaline cartilage, further entrapping the apex of the synovial fold. Manipulative therapy may traction and separate the articular surfaces apart, releasing the entrapped synovial fold.

    Historically, the entrapped synovial fold syndrome has been written about for decades. In the 1971 translation of their authoritative reference text The Human Spine in Health and Disease, Drs. Schmorl and Junghanns note (2):

    “Like other body articulations, the apophyseal joints are endowed with articular capsules, reinforcing ligaments and menisci-like internal articular discs.”

    “Like any other joint, the motor segment may become locked. This is usually associated with pain.” Chiropractors refer to such events as subluxations. These motor unit disturbances can cause torticollis and lumbago.

     

    “Various processes may cause such ‘vertebral locking.’ It may happen during normal movement. The incarceration of an articular villus or of a meniscus in an apophyseal joint may produce locking.”

     

    If a joint is suddenly incarcerated within the range of its physiologic mobility, as occurs with the meniscus incarceration of the knee joint, it is an “articular locking or a fixed articular block.”

     

    “Such articular locking is also possible in the spinal articulations (apophyseal joints, intervertebral discs, skull articulations, lumbosacral articulations). They may be mobilized again by specific therapeutic methods (stretchings, repositioning, exercises, etc.). Despite many opinions to the contrary, this type of locking is today increasingly recognized by physicians. Many physicians are employing manipulations which during the past decades were the tools of lay therapists only (chiropractors, osteopaths). However, these methods have at times been recommended by physicians. They have also been known in folk medicine and in medical schools of antiquity.”

    Schmorl and Junghanns’ text includes two photographs of anatomical sections through the facet joints showing these “menisci-like internal articular discs,” or meniscus. They also included three radiographs and one drawing showing abnormal gapping of an articulation as a consequence of meniscus entrapment in a facetal articulation. They note that such a meniscoid incarceration can cause acute torticollis, and they show a “follow-up roentgenogram after manual repositioning” resulting in “immediate relief of complaints and complete mobility.”

    In 1985, 30 distinguished international multidisciplinary experts collaborated on a text titled Aspects of Manipulative Therapy (3). The comments in this text pertaining to the interarticular meniscus (synovial entrapment syndrome) include:

    “Histologically, meniscoids are synovial tissue.”

    “Their innervation is derived from that of the capsule.”

    The current hypothetical model of the mechanism involved in acute joint locking is based on a phenomenon in which the “meniscoid embeds itself, thereby impeding mobility.”

    “It is highly probable that the meniscoids do play an important role in acute joint locking, and this is confirmed by the observation that all the joints afflicted by this condition are equipped with such structures.”

    In 1986, physical therapist Gregory Grieve authored a text titled Modern Manual Therapy of the Vertebral Column (4). This text boasts 61 international multidisciplinary contributors, contains 85 topic chapters, and is 898 pages in length. In the chapter titled “Acute Locking of the Cervical Spine” the text notes that a cause of acute cervical joint locking includes:

    “Postulated mechanical derangements of the apophyseal joint include nipped or trapped synovial fringes, villi or meniscoids.”

    In her 1994 text Physical Therapy of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine, professor of physiotherapy from the University of South Australia, Ruth Grant writes (5):

    “Acute locking can occur at any intervertebral level, but is most frequent at C2-C3. Classically, locking follows an unguarded movement of the neck, with instant pain over the articular pillar and an antalgic posture of lateral flexion to the opposite side and slight flexion, which the patient is unable to correct. Locking is more frequent in children and young adults. In many, the joint pain settles within 24 hours without requiring treatment (because the joint was merely sprained or because it unlocked spontaneously), but other patients will require a localized manipulation to unlock the joint.”

    In his 2004 text titled The Illustrated Guide to Functional Anatomy of the Musculoskeletal System (6), renowned physician and author Rene Cailliet, MD comments on the anatomy of the interarticular meniscus, stating:

    “The uneven surfaces between the zygapophyseal processes are filled by an infolding of the joint capsule, which is filled with connective tissue and fat called meniscoids. These meniscoids are highly vascular and well innervated.”

    In the fourth edition of his textbook Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum (7), physician, anatomist, and researcher Dr. Nikolai Bogduk writes:

    “The largest of the meniscoid structures are the fibro-adipose meniscoids. These project from the inner surface of the superior and inferior capsules. They consist of a leaf-like fold of synovium which encloses fat, collagen and some blood vessels.”

    “Fibro-adipose meniscoids are long and project up to 5 mm into he joint cavity.”

    “A relatively common clinical syndrome is ‘acute locked back.’ In this condition, the patient, having bent forward, is unable to straighten because of severe focal pain on attempted extension.”

    “Maintaining flexion is comfortable for the patient because that movement disengages the meniscoid. Treatment by manipulation becomes logical.”

    The January 15, 2007 publication of the top ranked orthopaedic journal Spine contains an article titled (8):

    High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Meniscoids

    in the Zygapophyseal Joints of the Human Cervical Spine

    Key Points From this article include:

    1) Pain originating from the cervical spine is a frequent condition.

    2) Neck pain can be caused by pathologic conditions of meniscoids within the zygapophysial joints.

    3) “Cervical zygapophysial joints are well documented as a possible source of neck pain, and it has been hypothesized that pathologic conditions related to so called meniscoids within the zygapophysial joints may lead to pain.”

    4) The meniscoids of the cervical facet joints contain nociceptors and may be a source of cervical facet joint pain.

    5) Proton density weighted MRI image sequence is best for the evaluation of the meniscoid anatomy and pathology.

    6) Meniscoids are best visualized with high-field MRI of 3.0 T strength.

    7) Meniscoids are best depicted in a sagittal slice orientation.

    8) The meniscoids in C1-C2 differ from those in the rest of the cervical spine.

    9) Meniscoids may become entrapped between the articular cartilages of the facet joints. This causes pain, spasm, reduced movement, and “an acute locked neck syndrome.” “Spinal adjusting can solve the problem by separating the apposed articular cartilages and releasing the trapped apex.”

    Meniscoids may become entrapped between the articular cartilages of the facet joints. This causes pain, spasm, reduced movement, and “an acute locked neck syndrome.” “Spinal adjusting can solve the problem by separating the apposed articular cartilages and releasing the trapped apex.”

    Clinical Applications

    Decades of evidence support the perspective that the inner aspect of the facet capsules have a process that extends into and between the facet articular surfaces. This evidence includes anatomical sections, histological sections, MR imaging, and clinical evaluations. This synovial fold can become entrapped between the facet articulating surfaces, producing pain, spasm, and antalgia. Published terminology for the anatomy includes synovial fold, synovial villus, meniscoid, meniscoid block, and joint locking.

    Using the cervical spine as a representative model, a classic clinical presentation would be that of an acute torticollis. If the synovial fold is entrapped on the left side of the cervical spine, the patient would present with an antalgia of right lateral flexion; in other words, the patient bends away from the side of entrapment. The patient’s primary pain symptoms will be on the side of entrapment, in this example, the left side (exactly like our patient Kim). Active range of motion examination will show that the patient is capable of additional lateral flexion to the right, but will not laterally flex to the left because of increased pain; once again this is because the synovial fold is entrapped on the left side and left lateral flexion increases meniscus compression, pain, and spasm. This is also why the patient is antalgic to the right; such positioning reduces left sided synovial fold compression, pain, and spasm.

    right antalgic lean right antalgic lean cervical vertebraeAdditional clinical evaluation will reveal no sings of radiculopathy; no alterations of superficial sensation in a dermatomal pattern, and no signs of motor weakness or altered deep tendon reflexes. An important clinical feature is that although the patient will not laterally flex the cervical spine to the left because of increased pain and spasm, left cervical lateral flexion against resistance without motion (the doctor holds the patient’s head so that there is no motion even though the left-sided cervical muscles are contracting) will not increase the patient’s pain. This is because the involvement is not muscular. Muscle contraction against resistance will not increase pain as long as the joint does not move in the meniscoid block syndrome.

    A typical treatment protocol to manage the synovial fold entrapment syndrome is that the patient is manipulated in an effort to free the entrapped meniscus. Post-graduate teachings in chiropractic orthopedics (Richard Stonebrink, DC, DABCO) and clinical experience indicate that the most successful manipulation would induce additional right lateral flexion; in other words, the manipulation would cause further right side antalgia. Such a maneuver would cause both a gapping of the facets on the left side as well as a tensioning of the left side facet capsules, together pulling free the entrapped synovial fold. When the precise level of synovial fold entrapment is ascertained and that precise level is manipulated in the appropriate direction to cause the intended neurobiomechanical changes, it is referred to by chiropractors as a “spinal adjustment.” The depth and speed of such an adjustment must be sufficient to overcome local muscle spasms that reflexively exist as a consequence of the pain the patient is experiencing. Following this first manipulation/adjustment, the patient may benefit from 10-15 minutes of axial traction to the cervical spine. Experience suggests that most patients will benefit from the application of a soft cervical collar, worn continuously until the following day. The patient is evaluated and manipulated/adjusted again the second day, followed once again by optional axial cervical traction, but there is no need for the soft cervical collar on the second day. The patient is given the third day off, returning the fourth day for a final evaluation and adjustment/manipulation. It is typical for complete symptomatic resolution to occur in a period of 3 – 5 days following onset and treatment.

    An important caution in adjusting/manipulating the meniscoid block lesion is to not do so in such a manner that it straightens the right antalgic lean. Recall that the patient is antalgic to the right because the synovial fold is entrapped on the left side. To attempt to straighten the right antalgic lean out will increase the meniscoid compression, pain and spasm, making the patient truly unhappy. In contrast, the adjustment/manipulation should be made in such a manner that the right antalgic lean is enhanced, gapping the left sided articulations, freeing the entrapped synovial fold, reducing pain and spasm.

    As described in the eighth edition of his book (1982) Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine (9), orthopaedic surgeon Sir James Cyriax describes how the fibers of the multifidus muscles blend with the facet joint capsular fibers. Chiropractic orthopedic training indicates that at the beginning of any joint movement, appropriate local articular proprioception will quickly initiate a contraction of the multifidus muscle, tightening the capsular ligaments, and pulling the meniscus of that joint into such a position that it cannot become entrapped. This suggests that the etiology of the meniscoid block syndrome is a failure of appropriate proprioceptive driven reflexes, indicative of a long-standing biomechanical problem. It is reasonable and appropriate to treat the long-standing biomechanical problem with a more prolonged series of spinal adjustments/manipulations and indicated rehabilitation. Failure to do so often results in frequent reoccurrences of the synovial fold entrapment syndrome following trivial mechanical environmental stresses.

    •••••

    …It had been eight weeks since the incidence in the shower. Kim’s white cervical collar had turned brown because she was wearing it constantly, day and night.

    The examination with the second chiropractor showed that Kim’s condition was unchanged; right cervical spine and head antalgic lean, almost no range of motion, and significant associated spasm. Yet, deep tendon reflexes, superficial sensation, and myotomal strength were all normal. There were no pathological reflexes suggestive of an upper motor neuron lesion. There were no indications of infection or autoimmune issues.

    New cervical radiographs were exposed, and as before there were no signs of degeneration, fracture, congenital or acquired anomalies. Certainly, there were no findings that could account for Kim’s antalgia, pain, and spasm.

    But there were some subtle hints giving clues to the pathology, diagnosis, and treatment, as noted above. The second chiropractor had learned about the syndrome and presentation in post-graduate education, and he had seen a number of patients with similar presentations over the years. Those subtle hints included:

    • The antalgic lean was to the right side, by about 35 degrees.
    • Kim would isolate the region of greatest pain as being on the left side, at approximately the C4-C5 level.
    • Kim could voluntarily laterally flex her cervical spine further to the right, by about 5 degrees, effectively worsening the right antalgic lean.
    • Kim was unable to laterally flex her cervical spine to the left at all; to attempt to do so was far too painful.
    • Kim sat up at the end of the table. The chiropractor stood at her right side, facing her, and placed his hands on the left side of Kim’s head. Kim was instructed to laterally flex her head/neck to the left, into the chiropractor’s hands. As Kim did this, the chiropractor used enough resistance with his hands to prevent all motion to the left. The left sided cervical musculature contracted nicely, and there was no increased pain as long as the chiropractor prevented all left sided motion. THERE WAS NO PAIN ON RESISTIVE EFFORTS to the left, as long as it was isometric and not allowing any motion.

    SUMMARY

    • Two sets of normal radiographs suggest that Kim is not suffering from fracture, dislocation, degenerative disease, acquired or congenital anomalies.
    • There were no indications of infection or autoimmune issues.
    • Normal deep tendon reflexes, superficial sensation and myotomal strength in both upper and lower extremities make it improbable that Kim is suffering from radiculopathy, neuropathy, or myelopathy.
    • No increased pain with isometric contraction of the muscles on the contra-lateral side of the antalgic lean (the left side in this case); as long as motion was prevented, contracting the muscles did not increase the pain. This indicates that the problem is not in the muscle.
    • A marked increase of pain with any left lateral flexion motion, whether active or passive.
    • Kim has a history of three injurious motor vehicle collisions where she injured her cervical spine.
    • Kim’s current problem began with a single motion of her neck to the left side.
    • Time and analgesics did not improve Kim’s symptoms or signs.
    • A left sided cervical spine chiropractic adjustment designed to straighten out her right antalgic lean caused an acute exacerbation of her symptoms and worsened her condition.

    INTERPRETATION

    Kim has a left-sided synovial joint entrapment, probably at the C4-C5 facet, causing an acute joint locking. Kim is antalgic to the right because such positioning reduces pressure on the left sided synovial entrapment. In contrast, any left lateral flexion increases the pinch and associated pain on the entrapped synovial fold. The cervical muscles are in spasm as a consequence of the antalgia and pain.

    TREATMENT

    The second chiropractor convinced Kim that the only solution for her problem was to manually adjust the right cervical spine in lateral flexion at the C4-C5 articulation level. This adjustment is designed to make the antalgic lean worse; remember, Kim could slightly laterally flex her cervical spine to the right without aggravating her pain. The adjustment would have to have enough velocity and depth to overcome the resistance of the increased tone from the spasmed musculature. If the adjustment was successful, it would gap the left sided C4-C5 facetal articulation, freeing the entrapped synovial fold. If successful, Kim should notice 50-80% improvement in antalgia, pain, and motion, essentially instantaneously.

    RESULTS

    As expected, success, with a single adjustment. Kim was about 75% improved within minutes. Although the adjustment was designed to make her right antalgic lean worse, after the cavitation of the C4-C5 articulation on the left and freeing-up of the entrapped synovial fold, Kim was significantly straighter, less antalgic.

    FOLLOW-UP

    Kim and other such patients should be adjusted in a similar fashion the very next day, as noted above. Typically, there is no adjustment the third day, but the patient is once again adjusted the fourth day. Residual muscle hypertonicity and joint stiffness should be resolved within 3-5 days.

    Eight weeks in a cervical collar necessitates muscular rehabilitation, starting with isometirc resistive efforts and gradually proceeding to isotonic resistive efforts.

    As noted above, a proposed root cause of the acute locked neck secondary to synovial fold entrapment is a post-traumatic mismatch between joint motion and the mechanoreceptive reflex to the shunt muscle that contracts the multifidi; When functioning appropriately, multifidi contraction would tighten the capsule and move the synovial fold out of harm’s way. This means the synovial fold entrapment exists secondary to a post-traumatic disruption of the proprioceptive driven reflex. The retraining of this proprioceptive mismatch may require a series of adjustments and exercises delivered over a period of time.

    I was the second chiropractor.

    And for a number of years, I counted the patients referred to me either directly or indirectly from the woman at the mall anchor store cosmetics counter. I stopped counting at about 700.

    Dan Murphy, DC

    References

    1) Webb AL, Collins P, Rassoulian H, Mitchell BS; Synovial folds – A pain in the neck?; Manual Therapy; April 2011; Vol. 16; No. 2; pp. 118-124.

    2) Junghanns H; Schmorl’s and Junghanns’ The Human Spine in Health and Disease; Grune & Stratton; 1971.

    3) Idczak GD; Aspects of Manipulative Therapy; Churchill Livingstone; 1985.

    4) Grieve G; Modern Manual Therapy of the Vertebral Column; Churchill Livingstone; 1986.

    5) Grant R; Physical Therapy of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine, second edition; Churchill Livingstone, 1994.

    6) Cailliet R; The Illustrated Guide to Functional Anatomy of the Musculoskeletal System, American Medical Association, 2004.

    7) Bogduk N; Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum, fourth edition; Elsevier, 2005.

    8) Friedrich KM. MD, Trattnig S, Millington SA, Friedrich M, Groschmidt K, Pretterklieber ML; High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Meniscoids in the Zygapophyseal Joints of the Human Cervical Spine; Spine; January 15, 2007, Volume 32(2), January 15, 2007, pp. 244-248.

    9) Cyriax J; Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine, Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions, eighth edition; Bailliere Tindall, 1982.

  • Back Pain Causes And More

    Back Pain Causes And More

    Joint Motion’s Influence On…

    Tissue Response, Infection, Inflammation, Trauma & Healing…

    And The Potential Pitfalls Of Clinical Joint Immobilization

    Back in 1984, orthopedic surgeon Sir James Cyriax, MD, reviewed The Concept Of Motion in his Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine, Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions (1). In this text, Dr. Cyriax carefully noted that harmful infections create tissue destruction, resulting in inflammation.

    A current prevailing concept in explaining this observation is the body recognizes this inflammation and attempts to “wall off” the infectious pathogens by creating a fibrous response.

    This is in fact in agreement with Dr. William Boyd who states in his pathology text (2):

    “The inflammatory reaction tends to prevent the dissemination of infection. Speaking generally, the more intense the reaction, the more likely the infection to be localized.”

    Physiologist and physician Arthur Guyton (3) provides support for this concept as well in his statement:

    “One of the first results of inflammation is to ‘wall off’ the area of injury from the remaining tissues. This walling-off process delays the spread of bacteria or toxic products.”

    Some interpret this type of response to mean that (in a world prior to the availability of antibiotics, inflammation, with reactive walling-off fibrosis to contain pathogens) it is desirable because it increases survivability of the host.

    As explained by three vaunted researchers Cyriax, Boyd, and Guyton above, the trigger to the walling-off fibrosis response of the body is inflammation.

    Problems appear to only seriously arise when the inflammatory trigger is non-infectious inflammation.

    In such cases, excessive tissue fibrosis creates local impairments in biomechanical function.

    This impairment in local biomechanical function affects performance, can generate pain, and accelerate degenerative changes. These impairments can adversely affect the patient for years or even decades.

    Fortunately, abnormal tissue fibrosis can be minimized with early, persistent, controlled motion. Once established, abnormal tissue fibrosis can be improved with the use of a variety of motion applications.

    Cyriax’s text (1) states the following:

    “The excessive reaction of tissues to an injury is conditioned by the overriding needs of a process designed to limit bacterial invasion.

    If there is to be only one pattern of response, it must be suited to the graver of the two possible traumas. However, elaborate preparation for preventing the spread of bacteria is not only pointless after an aseptic injury, but is so excessive as to prove harmful in itself. The principle on which the treatment of post-traumatic inflammation is based is that the reaction of the body to an injury unaccompanied by infection is always too great.” (Cyriax, p.14)

    Cyriax finds support in the sports trauma text authored by physicians Steven Roy and Richard Irvin (4), who state:

    “It is important to realize that the body’s initial reaction to an injury is similar to its reaction to an infection. The reaction is termed inflammation and may manifest macroscopically (such as after an acute injury) or at a microscopic level, with the latter occurring particularly in chronic overuse conditions.” (Roy, p. 125)

    Additional support for these concepts from Cyriax and Roy/Irvin are the writings of

    physician I. Kelman Cohen and associates (5). In their 1992 text Wound Healing, these authors note:

    “There are two important consequences of being a warm-blooded animal. One is that body fluids make optimal culture media for bacteria. It is to the animal’s advantage, therefore, to heal wounds with alacrity in order to reduce chances of infection.”

    “The prompt development of granulation tissue forecasts the repair of the interrupted dermal tissue to produce a scar.” In addition to providing tensile strength, scars are believed to be a barrier to infectious migration.

    The chronic nature of this scar tissue or fibrosis is expressed in the 1998 article by Thomas Melham and associates (6).

    These authors note that post-traumatic scar tissue can cause pain with activity, pain on palpation, decreased range of motion, and loss of function, and that these problems are resistant to surgery and to conventional physical.

    Excessive scar tissue contributes to chronic soft tissue dysfunction that cause significant disabilities and time lost from work or training activities, and these problems are often difficult to successfully treat. The authors extensively elaborate on the mechanical and neurological adverseness caused by connective tissue fibrosis, noting:

    “Many athletes develop excessive connective tissue fibrosis (scar tissue) or poorly organized scar tissue in and around muscles, tendons, ligaments, joints, and myofascial planes as a result of acute trauma, recurrent microtrauma, immobilization, or as a complication of surgical intervention.”

    “This can lead to soft tissue adhesions, tendonitis, tendonosis, fascial restrictions, and chronic inflammation or dysfunction which in many cases responds poorly to conventional treatments.”

    These authors present an argument that carefully and precisely applied external forces “appear to stimulate connective tissue remodeling through resorption of fibrosis, along with inducing repair and regeneration of collagen secondary to fibroblast recruitment.”

    Pain, Healing, and MOTION…

    As noted above, abnormal tissue fibrosis can be minimized with early, persistent, controlled motion.

    Once established, abnormal tissue fibrosis can be improved with the use of a variety of motion applications.

    Support for the value in using motion to treat soft-tissue injuries has been throughout the literature for decades.

    As an example, Beverly Hills neurosurgeon Emil Seletz, associated with the medical school at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), noted in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1958, the following, with respects to the management of whiplash soft-tissue injuries (7):

    “During injury, hemorrhage within the capsular ligaments gives rise to swelling of the nerves and eventually adhesions between the dural sleeve and the nerve root; these factors give rise to symptoms that may be prolonged for months or even years after the injury.”

    “In reviewing the types of treatment with a number of specialists in this field, it is found that, while therapy naturally varies to suit the individual need, it consists primarily of local heat in the form of hot wet packs and cervical traction, followed by very gentile massage and manual rotations.”

    “The importance of a carefully planned scheme of treatment must be emphasized to the patient, and treatments must be religiously carried out daily during the first two or three weeks (and then about three times weekly), depending, of course, on the individual case.”

    “Delay or faulty treatment leads to adhesions about the facets and scarring about the capsular ligaments, persistent spasm, congestive lymph edema, and fibrosis of muscles, swelling, and eventual adhesions of nerves within the nerve root canals.”

    “The resultant faulty posture in neglected cases enhances the degeneration of the intervertebral disks, as well as spur formation in the lateral co-vertebral articulations, which on the roentgenogram has come to be known as traumatic arthritis.”

    “I cannot too strongly emphasize the urgency of early and persistent therapy, always by a specialist in this field.”

    “Occasionally, a patient is seen with persistent complaints of head, neck, and shoulder pain, who has had on surgical exposure persistent swelling and adhesions of several nerve roots within the dural sleeve of exit. It is most likely that early, persistent, and adequate therapy by those expertly trained in physical medicine will prevent most patients from developing a surgical condition.”

    On this very same topic, Cyriax’s comments include a review of the 1940 primary research by ML Stearns (8), stating:

    “Her (Stearns) main conclusion on the mechanics of the formation of scar tissue was that external mechanical factors, were responsible for the development of the fibrillary network into orderly layers.

    Within four hours of applying a stimulus, an extensive network of fibrils was already visible around the fibroblasts; during the course of 48 hours this became dense enough to hide the cells almost completely: and in 12 days a heavy layer of fibrils had appeared.

    At first the fibrils developed at random, but later they acquired a definite arrangement, apparently as a direct result of the mechanical factors.

    Of these factors, movement is obviously the most important and equally obvious it is most effective and least likely to cause pain before the fibrils have developed an abnormal firm attachment to neighboring structures.

    When free mobility was encouraged from the onset, the fibers in the scar were arranged lengthwise as in a normal ligament.

    Gentle passive movements do not detach fibrils from their proper formation at the healing breach but prevent their continued adherence at normal sites.

    The fact that the fibrils rapidly spread in all directions provides sufficient reason for beginning movements at the earliest possible moment; otherwise they develop into strong fibrous scars (adhesions) that so often cause prolonged disability after a sprain.” (Cyriax, p. 15)

    Cyriax notes further:

    “When pain is due to bacterial inflammation, Hilton’s advocacy of rest remains unchallenged and is today one of the main principles of medical treatment.

    When, however somatic pain is caused by inflammation due to trauma, his ideas require modification.

    When non-bacterial inflammation attacks the soft tissues that move, treatment by rest has been found to result in chronic disability, later, although the symptoms may temporarily diminish.

    Hence, during the present century, treatment by rest has given way to therapeutic movement in many soft tissue lesions.

    Movement may be applied in various ways: the three main categories are:

    (a) active and resistive exercises:

    (b) passive, especially forced movement: and

    (c) deep massage.” (Cyriax, p.14)

    “Tension within the granulation tissue lines the cells up along the direction of stress.

    Hence, during the healing of mobile tissues, excessive immobilization is harmful.

    It prevents the formation of a scar strong in the important direction by avoiding the strains leading to due orientation of fibrous tissue and also allows the scar to become unduly adherent, e.g. to bone.” (Cyriax, p.15)

    In 1983, sports physicians Steven Roy and Richard Irvin also note (4):

    “The trauma, or initial lesion, leads to an increase of the friction that occurs between moving tissues as well as to a release of chemical mediators, both of which may start the inflammatory process.

    This process may present macroscopically with a number of signs, particularly (a) pain (b) swelling, and (c) redness and warmth. However, microtrauma may not present with any of these signs, particularly during the early stages, even though the inflammation is proceeding at the microscopic level.” (p. 125)

    “The injured tissues next undergo remodeling, which can take up to one year to complete in the case of major tissue disruption.

    The remodeling stage blends with the later part of the regeneration stage, which means that motion of the injured tissues will influence their structure when they are healed.

    This is one reason why it is necessary to consider using controlled motion during the recovery stage.

    If a limb is completely immobilized during the recovery process, the tissues may emerge fully healed but poorly adapted functionally, with little chance for change, particularly if the immobilization has been prolonged.

    Another reason for encouraging controlled motion is that any adhesions that develop will be flexible and will thus allow the tissues to move easily on each other.

    Caution should be observed during the first two weeks, as mentioned previously, as the tensile strength of the tissues may be markedly reduced.” (p.127)

    In 1986, physician John Kellett notes (9):

    Acute inflammation is beneficial when one has acute infection. However, the “acute inflammatory phase of the body’s response to trauma is apparently of no benefit.”

    “The micropathology of acute soft tissue trauma has been investigated. Healing of ligaments and soft tissue injuries in general has been shown to occur by fibrous repair (scar tissue) and not by regeneration of the damaged tissue.”

    “Early mobilization, guided by the pain response, promotes a more rapid return to full activity.”

    “Early mobilization, guided by the pain response, promotes a more rapid return to full functional recovery.”

    “The collagen is remodeled to increase the functional capabilities of the tendon or ligament to withstand the stresses imposed upon it.”

    “It appears that the tensile strength of the collagen is quite specific to the forces imposed on it during the remodeling phase: i.e. the maximum strength will be in the direction of the forces imposed on the ligament.”

    Dr. Kellett summarizes the benefits of early mobilization following soft tissue injury as follows:

    1) Improvement of bone and ligament strength, reducing recurrence of injury.

    2) The strength of repaired ligaments is proportional to the mobility of the ligament, resulting in larger diameter collagen fiber bundles and more total collagen.

    3) “Collagen fiber growth and realignment can be stimulated by early tensile loading of muscle, tendon, and ligament.”

    4) Collagen formation is not confined to the healing ligaments, but adheres to surrounding tissues. The formation of these adhesions between repairing tissues and adjacent structures is minimized by early movement.

    5) With motion, “joint proprioception is maintained or develops earlier after injury, and this may be of importance in preventing recurrences of injuries and in hastening full recovery to competitive fitness.”

    6) The nutrition to the cartilage is better maintained with early mobilization.

    7) Following this acute inflammatory phase and largely guided by the pain response of the patient, early mobilization is commenced, based upon the premise that the stress of movement on repairing collagen is largely responsible for the orientation and tensile strength of the tendons and ligaments.

    Dr. Cohen (5) and associates also comment even further on the value of range of motion exercises in the management of soft tissue injury, by stating:

    “During the phase of wound contraction, the active cellular process is locked into position by increasing amounts of rigid collagenous scar. Frequent, gentle exercise can be used to put an extremity joint through a full range of motion and keep the newly developing scar tissue stretched and remodeled. Frequent use of the range of motion exercises is important to keep the developing and contracting scar tissue from becoming a rigid, fixed scar contracture. Range of motion exercises concentrate on remodeling the newly laid collagen before it develops into a rigid scar contracture.” (p. 110)

    In 1994, Halldor Jonsson and associates (10) performed surgical evaluations of 50 patients with chronic whiplash symptoms, showing a “high incidence of discoligamentous injuries in whiplash-type distortions.” The authors noted:

    “The injured spinal segments had become increasingly stiffer over 5 years, which may reflect healing of unrecognized soft tissue injuries.”

    “The most likely source of radicular symptoms is perineural scarring.

    Therefore, patients with neck distortions after traffic accidents should be mobilized early within the limits of pain to prevent scar transformation of hidden injuries.”

    In 1996, orthopedic surgeon Joseph Buckwalter, MD, from the University of Iowa, adds to the concepts with the following points from an article published in the journal Hand Clinics (11):

    1) Treatment of tissue injuries with prolonged rest delays recovery and can cause irreversible changes in tissue strength and function.

    2) Early motion of tissue injuries maintains the structure and composition of normal bone, tendon, ligament, articular cartilage and muscle.

    3) Immobilization of dense fibrous tissues (tendon, ligament, and joint capsule) causes the tissues to be weaker and stiffer.

    4) Complete restoration of normal ligament insertion structure and mechanical properties require up to one year of activity, which can mean some patients may require a year of management following these injuries.

    5) Ageing decreases the adaptive response to repetitive loading, indicating that older patients do not respond as well to the same treatment delivered to younger patients, and that older patients may require more treatment and have a worse prognosis for complete recovery.

    6) Early motion during the repair and remodeling phases of healing can decrease or prevent adhesions.

    In 1997, US President Bill Clinton tore the tendon of his quadriceps at the attachment to the patella. After surgical repair, President Clinton was put into a passive range of motion device to improve the timing and quality of healing of his injury.

    The device used to treat Mr. Clinton was researched by Canadian orthopedic surgeon Robert Salter. Dr. Salter has published many primary research studies on the physiological effects of passive motion.

    Much of this research is summarized in his 1993 book Continuous passive Motion, A Biological Concept for the Healing and Regeneration of Articular Cartilage, Ligaments, and Tendons; From Origination to Research to Clinical Applications (12).

    It can be reasonably assumed that President Clinton received the best treatment in the world for his injuries. All indications reflect that he enjoyed a speedy and complete recovery.

    Lastly, as presented here, an excellent review on The Concept Of Motion was published in the journal The Physician and Sports Medicine in 2000 by Pekka Kannus, MD, Ph.D. (13).

    Dr. Kannus is chief physician and head of the Accident and Trauma Research Center and sports medicine specialist at the Tampere Research Center of Sports Medicine at the UKK Institute in Tampere, Finland. His article titled “Immobilization or Early Mobilization After an Acute Soft-Tissue Injury?” notes:

    “Experimental and clinical studies demonstrate that early, controlled mobilization is superior to immobilization for primary treatment of acute musculoskeletal soft-tissue injuries and postoperative management.”

    Prolonged inflammation may lead to excessive scarring. Therefore, early, effective treatment seeks to prevent prolonged inflammation and excessive scarring.

    “The current literature on experimental acute soft-tissue injury speaks strongly for the use of early, controlled mobilization rather than immobilization for optimal heating.”

    Experimentally induced ligament tears in animals heal much better with early, controlled mobilization than with immobilization.

    “The superiority of early controlled mobilization has been especially clear in terms of quicker recovery and return to full activity without jeopardizing the subjective or objective long-term outcome.”

    “Controlled experimental and clinical trials have yielded convincing evidence that early, controlled mobilization is superior to immobilization for musculoskeletal soft-tissue injuries. This holds true not only in primary treatment of acute injuries, but also in their postoperative management. The superiority of early controlled mobilization is especially apparent in terms of producing quicker recovery and return to full activity, without jeopardizing the long-term rehabilitative outcome. Therefore, the technique can be recommended as the method of choice for acute soft-tissue injury.”

    Two Additional Supportive Studies…

    Suportive Study #1

    Early Mobilization of Acute Whiplash Injuries (14)

    British Medical Journal

    March 1986

    In this study, 61 whiplash-injured patients were randomized to treatment with either “a period of immobility using a soft collar and simple analgesia before gradual mobilization” (standard treatment), or a alternative treatment involving “daily neck exercises and mobilization.” The authors concluded that:

    “Results showed that eight weeks after the accident the degree of improvement seen in the actively treated group compared with the group given standard treatment was significantly greater for both cervical movement and intensity of pain.”

    “Our results confirmed expectations that initial immobility after whiplash injuries gives rise to prolonged symptoms whereas a more rapid improvement can be achieved by early active management without any consequent increase in discomfort.”

    Supportive Study #2

    Early Intervention in Whiplash-Associated Disorders

    A Comparison of Two Treatment Protocols (15)

    Spine

    July 15, 2000

    This study was designed as a prospective randomized trial in 97 patients with a whiplash injury caused by a motor vehicle collision. Patients were randomly assigned to initial cervical collar or to early active mobilization. The authors concluded:

    “In patients with whiplash-associated disorders caused by a motor vehicle collision, treatment with frequently repeated, active submaximal movements combined with mechanical diagnosis and therapy is more effective in reducing pain than a standard program of initial rest, recommended use of a soft collar, and gradual self-mobilization.”

    “The main finding in this study was that active treatment of whiplash associated disorder resulted in a significantly greater pain reduction than standard [initial immobilization] treatment.”

    “In patients with WAD caused by a motor vehicle collision, early treatment with frequently repeated active submaximal movements combined with mechanical diagnosis and therapy is more effective in reducing pain than treatment with initial rest, recommendation of a soft collar, and a gradual introduction of home exercises.”

    Conclusions

    The discussion and references above support the concept that adverse pathogens cause tissue destruction and subsequent inflammation. The body appears to respond in a manner to wall-off the area of inflammation by over healing the region with a fibrous response.

    The fibrous response appears to be a physical barrier, reducing the ability of the pathogens to spread to other regions of the body, thereby improving the host’s chances for survival.

    However, when inflammation is caused by non-infectious mechanisms, the same fibrotic tissue response occurs. In such cases, without infectious pathogens, the fibrotic tissue response is excessive, resulting in mechanical harm to the host.

    This harmful tissue fibrosis is worsened with early immobilization of the affected tissues.

    This tissue fibrosis is minimized with early persistent controlled mobilization.

    Established harmful tissue fibrosis is best managed with specific controlled motion for purpose of adhesion rupture and remodeling. The motion to treat established harmful fibrotic tissue should be individualized to the needs of the patient.

    Different fibrotic tissues respond optimally to different categories of controlled motion application:

    1) Periarticular tissue fibrosis responds optimally to joint adjustments / specific line-of-drive manipulation.

    2) Muscle fibrosis responds well to active resistive exercise.

    3) Non-contractile tissue (tendon, fascia, ligament, etc.) fibrosis responds best to manually applied tissue friction.

    Most patients have a combination of tissues that are adversely affected, depending on the mechanism of injury or stress.

    Consequently, a combination of these applications of controlled motion, by someone who is expertly trained, is often required to achieve timely, efficient, and long-lasting clinical improvements.

    REFERENCES

    1) Cyriax, James; Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine, Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions, Bailliere Tindall, Volume 1, eighth edition, 1982.

    2) Boyd, William, Pathology, Lea and Febiger, 1952.

    3) Guyton, Arthur, Textbook of Medical Physiology, Saunders, 1986.

    4) Roy, Steven; Irvin, Richard; Sports Medicine: Prevention, Evaluation, Management, and Rehabilitation, Prentice-Hall, 1983.

    5) Cohen, I. Kelman; Diegelmann, Robert F; Lindbald, William J; Wound Healing, Biochemical & Clinical Aspects, WB Saunders, 1992.

    6) Melham TJ, Sevier TL, Malnofski MJ, Wilson JK, Helfst RK, Chronic ankle pain and fibrosis successfully treated with a new noninvasive augmented soft tissue mobilization technique (ASTM); Medicine Science Sports Exercise, June 1998; 30(3): 801-4.

    7) Seletz E, Whiplash Injuries, Neurophysiological Basis for Pain and Methods Used for Rehabilitation; Journal of the American Medical Association, November 29, 1958, pp. 1750– 1755.

    8) Stearns, ML, Studies on development of connective tissue in transparent chambers in rabbit’s ear; American Journal of Anatomy, vol. 67, 1940, p. 55.

    9) Kellett J, Acute soft tissue injuries–a review of the literature;

    Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. Oct. 1986;18(5):489-500.

    10) Jonsson H, Cesarini K, Sahlstedt B, Rauschning W, Findings and Outcome in Whiplash-Type Neck Distortions; Spine, Vol. 19, No. 24, December 15, 1994, pp 2733-2743.

    11) Buckwalter J, Effects of Early Motion on Healing of Musculoskeletal Tissues, Hand Clinics, Volume 12, Number 1, February 1996.

    12) Salter R, Continuous Passive Motion, A Biological Concept for the Healing and Regeneration of Articular Cartilage, Ligaments, and Tendons; From Origination to Research to Clinical Applications, Williams and Wilkins, 1993.

    13) Kannus P, Immobilization or Early Mobilization After an Acute Soft-Tissue Injury?; The Physician And Sports Medicine; March, 2000; Vol. 26 No 3, pp. 55-63.

    14) Mealy K, Brennan H, Fenelon GCC; Early Mobilization of Acute Whiplash Injuries; British Medical Journal, March 8, 1986, 292(6521): 656-657.

    15) Rosenfeld M, Gunnarsson R, Borenstein P, Early Intervention in Whiplash-Associated Disorders, A Comparison of Two Treatment Protocols; Spine, 2000;25:1782-1787.

  • The Healing of Injured Soft Tissues

    The Healing of Injured Soft Tissues

    In this month’s issue we’re going to touch on area of patient treatment that has undergone enormous leaps and bounds in our understanding over the last decade. An area I will refer to as “Post-Traumatic Soft Tissue Injury”.

    Even with recent breakthroughs in understanding the physiology of repair (and possibly because of these RECENT breakthroughs) there is a considerable amount of misunderstanding regarding soft tissue injury and its repair.

    The most common (almost knee-jerk) misconception is that injured soft tissue will heal in a period of time between four and eight weeks.

    Frequently it is claimed that injured soft tissues will heal spontaneously, leaving no long-term residual damage, and that treatment is not required. This type of information is extremely misleading and confusing to both doctor and patient alike.

    Published articles and books concerning the healing of injured soft tissues (Oakes 1982; Roy and Irving 1983; Kellett 1986; Buckwalter/Woo 1988, Majno 2004) indicate that the time frame for such healing is approximately one year.

    Needless to say the difference between a recovery time of 4-8 weeks and 12 months dramatically impacts both clinical practice and expected outcomes.

    Healing Takes Place In Three Specific Phases. Soft Tissue Healing Phase #1 Acute Inflammatory Phase.

    This phase will last approximately 72 hours. During this phase, after the initial injury, an electrical current is generated at the wound, called the “current of injury.”

    This “current of injury” attracts fibroblasts to the wound (Oschman, 2000).

    During this phase there is also initial bleeding and continual associated inflammation of the injured tissues. Because of the increasing inflammatory cascade during this period of time, it is not uncommon for the patient to feel worse for each of the first three days following injury.

    Because there is disruption of local vascular supplies, there is insufficient availability of substrate (glucose, oxygen, etc.) to produce large enough quantities of ATP energy to initiate collagen protein synthesis to repair the wound.

    After 72 hours following injury, the damaged blood vessels have mended. The resulting increased availability of glucose and oxygen elevates local ATP levels and collagen repair begins by the fibroblasts that accumulated during the acute inflammatory phase.

    Soft Tissue Healing Phase #2 Phase Of Regeneration

    During the regeneration phase the disruption in the injured muscles and ligaments is bridged. Some references call the regeneration phase the phase of repair, which creates confusion about the timing of healing (Jackson, 1977).

    “Repair” connotation is that the process has completed, which, as we well see, is not the case. The fibroblasts manufacture and secrete collagen protein glues that bridge the gap in the torn tissues. This phase will last approximately 6-8 weeks (Jackson, 1977).

    At the end of 6-8 weeks, the gap in the torn tissues is more than 90% bridged. Many will erroneously claim this to be the end of healing. However, it clearly is not. There is a third and final phase of healing. This phase is called the phase of remodeling.

    Soft Tissue Healing Phase #2 Phase Of Remodeling

    The phase of remodeling starts near the end of the phase of regeneration. During the phase of remodeling the collagen protein glues that have been laid down for repair are remodeled in the direction of stress and strain.

    This means that the fibers in the tissue will become stronger, and will change their orientation from an irregular pattern to a more regular pattern, a pattern more like the original undamaged tissues.

    Proper treatment during this remodeling phase is very necessary if the tissues are to get the best end product of healing. It is during this remodeling phase that the tissues regain strength and alignment. Remodeling takes approximately one year after the date of injury.

    It is established that remodeling takes place as a direct byproduct of motion. Chiropractic healthcare puts motion into the tissues in an effort at getting them to line up along the directions of stress and strain, thereby giving a stronger, more elastic end product of healing.

    stages of healing following soft tissue injury

    Traditional chiropractic joint manipulation healthcare is directed towards putting motion into the periarticular paraphysiological space.

    The concept of paraphysiological joint motion was first described by Sandoz in 1976, and is explained well by Kirkalady-Willis 1983 and 1988, by Kirkalady-Willis/Cassidy 1985, and in the 2004 monograph on Neck Pain (edited by Fischgrund) published by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (see picture).

    These discussions clearly show that there is a component of motion that cannot be properly addressed by exercise, massage, etc, and that this component of motion can be properly addressed by osseous joint manipulation.

    Therefore, traditional chiropractic osseous joint manipulation adds a unique aspect to the treatment and the remodeling of periarticular soft tissues that have sustained an injury.

    There are some problems associated with the healing of injured soft tissues. Microscopic histological studies show that the repaired tissue is different than the original, adjacent, undamaged tissues.

    During the initial acute inflammatory phase there is bleeding from the damaged tissues and consequent local inflammation. This progressive bleeding releases increased numbers of fibroblasts into the surrounding tissues.

    Chemicals that are released trigger the inflammation response that is noted in cases of trauma. Subsequent to the inflammatory response and to the number of fibrocytes that are released into the tissues, the healing process is really a process of fibrosis.

    Fibrosis

    In 1975, Stonebrink addresses that the last phase of the pathophysiological response to trauma is tissue fibrosis. Boyd in 1953, Cyriax in 1983, and Majno/Joris in 2004 note that there is tissue fibrosis subsequent to trauma.

    This fibrosis of repair subsequent to soft tissue trauma creates problems that can adversely affect the tissues and the patient for years, decades, or even forever.

    Fibrosed tissues are functionally different from the adjacent normal tissues. The differences fall into two main categories:

    Fibrosis Category 1:

    The repaired tissue is weaker and less strong than the undamaged tissues. This is because the diameter of the healing collagen fibers is smaller, and the end product of healing is deficient in the number of crossed linkages within the collagen repair.

    Fibrosis Category 2:

    The repaired tissue is stiffer or less elastic than the original, undamaged tissues. This is because the healing fibers are not aligned identically to that of the original. Examination range of motion studies will indicate that there are areas of decrease of the normal joint ranges of motion.

    In addition, Cyriax notes “fibrous tissue is capable of maintaining an inflammatory response long after the initial cause has ceased to operate.”

    Since inflammation alters the thresholds of the nociceptive afferent system, physical examinations in these cases will show these fibrotic areas display increased sensitivity, and digital pressure may show hypertonicity and spasm.

    This increased sensitivity can be documented with the use of an algometer, which is a device that uses pressure to determine the initiating threshold of pain.

    Because the fibrotic residuals have rendered the tissues weaker, less elastic, and more sensitive, the patient will have a history of flare-ups of pain and/or spasm at times of increased use or stress.

    These episodes of pain and/or spasm at times of increased use or stress of the once damaged soft tissues is the rule rather than the exception, and a problem that the patient will have to learn to live with.

    It is likely that the patient will continue to have episodes of pain and/or spasm for an indefinite period of time in the future. It is probable that the patient will have a need for continuing care subsequent to these episodes of pain and/or spasm.

    Consistent with these concepts, a study by Hodgson in 1989 indicated that…

    62% of those injured in automobile accidents still have significant symptoms caused by the accident 12 1/2 years after being injured; and that of the symptomatic 62%, 62.5% had to permanently alter their work activities and 44% had to permanently alter their leisure activities in order to avoid exacerbation of symptoms.

    One of the conclusions of the article is that these long-term residuals were most likely the result of post-traumatic alterations in the once damaged tissues.

    A study by Gargan in 1990 indicated that…

    Only 12% of those sustaining a soft tissue neck injury had achieved a complete recovery more than ten years after the date of the accident.

    One of the conclusions of this study is that the patient’s symptoms would not improve after a period of two years following the injury.

    It is established neurologically (Wyke 1985, Kirkalady-Willis and Cassidy 1985) that when a chiropractor adjusts (specific directional spinal manipulation) the joints of the region of pain and/or spasm, that there is a depolarization of the mechanoreceptors that are located in the facet joint capsular ligaments, and that the cycle of pain and/or spasm can be neurologically aborted. This is why many patients feel better after they receive specific joint manipulation from a chiropractor following an episode of increased pain and/or spasm.

    What Is The Basis For The Chronic Post-Trauma Pain Syndromes So Many Patients Suffer From?

    A good explanation is found from Gunn (1978, 1980, 1989). He refers to this type of pain as supersensitivity.

    The supersensitivity type pain is a residual of the scarring or the fibrosis that was created by the injuries sustained in this accident.

    The treatment that we give to the patient for the injuries sustained in an accident is really not designed to heal the sprain or strain but rather, to change the fibrotic nature of the reparative process that has left the patient with residuals that are weaker, stiffer, and more sore.

    The actual diagnosis for this type of problem is initial sprain/strain injuries of the paraspinal soft tissues with fibrotic residuals subsequent to the fibrosis of repair of once damaged soft tissues that have left these tissues weaker, stiffer, and more sensitive as compared to the original tissues.

    The majority of our efforts in the treatment of post-traumatic chronic pain syndrome patients is in dealing with the residual fibrosis of repair and its associated mechanical and neurological consequences.

    These residuals to some degree are most probably permanent. The patient will have to learn to deal with the long-term residuals and the occasional episodes of pain and/or spasm.

    However, as noted above, occasional specific joint manipulation in the involved areas can neurologically inhibit muscle tone, improve ranges of motion, disperse accumulated inflammatory exudates, and the patient will have less pain and improved function.

    The concepts briefly discussed above are frequently not understood or appreciated. There is a tendency for healthcare providers to not properly examine the patient in order to document these regions of tissue fibrosis and its consequent mechanical and neurological consequences and, therefore, to quote Stonebrink, the real problem is missed.

    joint ranges of motion

    References:

    Boyd, William, M.D., Pathology, Lea & Febiger, (1952).

    Cyriax, James, M.D., Orthopaedic Medicine, Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions, Bailliere Tindall, Vol. 1, (1982).

    Fischgrund, Jeffrey S, Neck Pain, monograph 27, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2004.

    Gargan, MF, Bannister, GC, Long-Term Prognosis of Soft-Tissue Injuries of the Neck, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, September, 1990.

    Gunn, C. Chan, Pain, Acupuncture & Related Subjects, C. Chan Gunn,

    (1985).

    Gunn, C. Chan, Treating Myofascial Pain: Intramuscular Stimulation (IMS) for Myofascial Pain Syndromes of Neuropathic Origin, University of Washington, 1989.

    Hodgson, S.P. and Grundy, M., Whiplash Injuries: Their Long-term Prognosis and Its Relationship to Compensation, Neuro-Orthopedics, (1989), 7.88-91.

    Kellett, John, “Acute soft tissue injuries-a review of the literature,” Medicine and Science of Sports and Exercise, American College of Sports Medicine, Vol. 18 No.5, (1986), pp 489-500.

    Kirkaldy-Willis, W.H., M.D., Managing Low Back Pain, Churchill Livingston, (1983 & 1988).

    Kirkaldy-Willis, W.H., M.D., & Cassidy, J.D.,”Spinal Manipulation in the Treatment of Low-Back Pain,” Can Fam Physician, (1985), 31:535-40.

    Majno, Guido and Joris, Isabelle, Cells, Tissues, and Disease: Principles of General Pathology, Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Oakes BW. Acute soft tissue injuries. Australian Family Physician. 1982; 10 (7): 3-16.

    Oschman, James L, Energy Medicine: The Scientific Basis, Churchill Livingstone, 2000.

    Roy, Steven, M.D., and Irvin, Richard, Sports Medicine: Prevention, Evaluation, Management, and Rehabilitation, Prentice-Hall, Inc. (1983).

    Stonebrink, R.D., D.C., “Physiotherapy Guidelines for the Chiropractic Profession,” ACA Journal of Chiropractic, (June1975), Vol. IX, p.65-75.

    Wyke, B.D., Articular neurology and manipulative therapy, Aspects of Manipulative Therapy, Churchill Livingstone, 1980, pp.72-77.

    Woo, Savio L.-Y.,(ed.), Injury and Repair of the Musculoskeletal Soft Tissues, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,(1988), p.18-21; 106-117; 151-7; 199-200; 245-6; 300-19; 436-7; 451-2; 474-6.

  • Treatment of Joint Pain

    Treatment of Joint Pain

    The Potential Viability of Omega-3 Essential Fatty Acids as an Anti-Inflammatory Agent

    We are going to deviate from the mechanical discussions of joint pain treatment. Usual topics such as physiotherapy, stretching, manipulation, etc… and instead we’re going to discuss what looks to be a remarkably inexpensive yet potentially valuable tool in combating joint pain and inflammation.

    Far removed from today’s ultra-popular yet often little tested “health foods” and “supplements” this tool has undergone testing and research typically avoided by “natural substances” and we’ll be discussing those studies in just a little bit.

    The tool I’m referring to is the “Omega-3 Essential Fatty Acids”

    Fatty acids are a chain (of variable length) of carbon atoms that have a starting carboxyl group (-COOH). The ending carbon of the chain is known as the omega carbon. The ending omega carbon is also a methyl group, meaning it is bonded with three hydrogen atoms (-CH3).

    There are four broad categories of fatty acids***:

    (see the appendix of this issue for a detailed chemistry primer of fatty acids and their components)

    Saturated

    Monounsaturated

    Omega-3 polyunsaturated

    Omega-6 polyunsaturated

    Essential For Human Health

    Importantly, both omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids are essential for human health, and our patient’s bodies do not have the ability to create them from other fatty acids.

    Consequently, both omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids must be consumed in the diet. Dietary deficiencies in either omega-6 or omega-3 fatty acids are deleterious to our patients health.

    Additionally, the ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids is critically important. “Historical estimates place the ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 oils at nearly 1:1 for prehistoric humans.”

    The ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids has changed dramatically due to the widespread use of vegetable oils (mostly n-6 fats) in cooking and foods.

    By 1900, the ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids had increased to about 4:1.

    The current American ratio is about 25:1.

    This “sharp rise is due to increased vegetable oil consumption: from 2 lb. per year in 1909 to 25 lb. per year in 1985!” (Mark Boswell and B. Eliot Cole, editors;American Academy of Pain Management Weiner’s Pain Management, A Practical Guide for Clinicians; Seventh Edition, 2006, pp.584-585.)

    *(For the biological enzymatic processing of omega-6 fatty acids schematic see the appendix at the end of this issue)

    A critically important aspect of essential fatty acid biology is…

    The 20-carbon long omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids are the precursors to a group of powerful but short-lived hormone-like compounds called “eicosanoids.”

    One category of eicosanoids is referred to as “prostaglandins.”

    Another group is referred to as “leukotrienes.”

    Clinical applications of this biochemistry includes:

    Arachidonic Acid (AA), the 20-carbon long omega-6 fatty acid is enzymatically converted into the eicosanoids called “series 2 prostaglandins,” such as “Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2),” by enzymes referred to as “cyclo-oxygenase” or “COX.”

    Prostaglandin E2 is pro-inflammatory, which alters the threshold of the pain afferent neurons in the region, and patients experience increased pain.

    Arachidonic Acid (AA), is also enzymatically converted into the eicosanoids called “series 4 leukotrienes,” such as “Leukotriene B4 (LTB4),” by enzymes referred to as “lipo-oxygenase” or “LOX.”

    Leukotriene B4 is also pro-inflammatory, and patients experience increased pain.

    Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), the 20-carbon long omega-3 fatty acid is enzymatically converted into the eicosanoids called “series 3 prostaglandins,” such as “Prostaglandin E3 (PGE3),” by the same cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzymes that convert arachidonic acid into pro-inflammatory prostaglandin E2.

    pro vs anti inflammatory

    Historically, the conversion of arachidonic acid into pro-inflammatory prostaglandin E2 has been inhibited by utilization of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that block the cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzymes.

    However, as noted in the article reviews below, long-term use of these drugs can cause problems in some patients.

    Additionally, the article reviews below indicate that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) do not inhibit the lipo-oxygenase (LOX) pathway and therefore do not inhibit the formation of pro-inflammatory series 4 leukotrienes.

    In contrast the omega-3 fatty acid Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) inhibits both cyclo-oxygenase (COX) and lipo-oxygenase (LOX) enzymes, reducing the production of both pro-inflammatory prostaglandin E2 and series 4 leukotrienes.

    omega-3 fatty acid Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) inhibits both cyclo-oxygenase (COX) and lipo-oxygenase (LOX) enzymes, reducing the production of both pro-inflammatory prostaglandin E2 and series 4 leukotrienes.

    Pain:

    “Omega-3 Fatty acids (fish oil) as an anti-inflammatory: an alternative to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for discogenic pain”
    Surgical Neurology 65 (April 2006) 326– 331 This paper won first prize in the poster competition at the American Association of Neurological Surgeons Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, April 2005

    Joseph Charles Maroon, MD, Jeffrey W. Bost, PAC

    These authors are from the

    Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    FROM ABSTRACT:

    Background:

    The use of NSAID medications is a well-established effective therapy for both acute and chronic nonspecific neck and back pain.

    Extreme complications, including gastric ulcers, bleeding, myocardial infarction, and even deaths, are associated with their use.

    An alternative treatment with fewer side effects that also reduces the inflammatory response and thereby reduces pain is believed to be omega-3 EFAs found in fish oil.

    We report our experience in a neurosurgical practice using fish oil supplements for pain relief.

    Methods:

    From March to June 2004, 250 patients who had been seen by a neurosurgeon and were found to have nonsurgical neck or back pain were asked to take a total of 1200 mg per day of omega-3 EFAs (eicosapentaenoic acid and decosahexaenoic acid) found in fish oil supplements.

    Results:

    78% were taking 1200 mg and 22% were taking 2400 mg of EFAs.

    After an average of 75 days on fish oil:

    59% discontinued to take their prescription NSAID medications for pain.

    88% stated they were satisfied with their improvement and stated they would continue to take the fish oil.

    There were no significant side effects reported.

    Conclusions:

    Our results mirror other controlled studies that compared ibuprofen and omega-3 EFAs demonstrating equivalent effects in reducing arthritic pain.

    Omega-3 EFA fish oil supplements appear to be a safer alternative to NSAIDs for treatment of nonsurgical neck or back pain.

    KEY POINTS FROM AUTHORS

    Maroon & Bost from

    Department of Neurological Surgery,

    University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    1) The use of NSAIDs is associated with occasional extreme complications, including gastric ulcers, bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, and even death.

    2) In this study, after 75 days on fish oil, 59% of patients who were taking NSAIDs for chronic spinal pain and who had degenerative spine disease, were able to discontinue their prescription NSAIDs, and 88% stated they were satisfied with their improvement and that they would continue to take the fish oil.

    3) In this study, fish oil supplementation was not associated with any significant side effects.

    4) “Omega-3 EFA fish oil supplements appear to be a safer alternative to NSAIDs for treatment of nonsurgical neck or back pain.”

    5) “More than 70 million NSAID prescriptions are written each year, and 30 billion over-the-counter NSAID tablets are sold annually.”

    6) “5% to 10% of the adult US population and approximately 14% of the elderly routinely use NSAIDs for pain control.”

    7) Selling NSAIDs is a 9 billion dollar per year US industry.

    8) Prescription NSAIDs for rheumatoid and osteoarthritis alone conservatively cause 16,500 deaths per year.

    9) “NSAIDs are the most common cause of drug-related morbidity and mortality reported to the FDA and other regulatory agencies around the world.”

    10) “The agent best documented by hundreds of references in the literature for its anti-inflammatory effects is omega-3 EFAs found in fish and in pharmaceutical-grade fish oil supplements.”

    11) The beneficial anti-inflammatory affects of high-dose fish oil include the reduction of joint pain from rheumatoid and osteoarthritis, improvement in dry eyes and macular degeneration, reduced plaque formation, reduced arrhythmias, and reduced infarction from coronary arthrosclerosis.

    12) COX-2 inhibitors significantly increase gastric and cardiovascular side effects.

    13) Omega-3 EPA is used to make the anti-inflammatory eicosanoids (PGE3), whereas excess omega-6 EFAs form inflammatory arachidonic acid based eicosanoids (PGE2).

    14) “Animal proteins, especially red meat, also contain an abundant amount of arachidonic acid.”

    15) A deficiency in omega-3 fatty acids, especially EPA, will result in a deficiency of anti-inflammatory prostaglandins.

    16) “To encourage the production of anti-inflammatory PGs and to discourage the production of inflammatory PGs, saturated fats, trans-fatty acids, and arachidonic acid should be reduced in the diet; blood glucose should be controlled; and appropriate amounts of omega-3 fatty acids found in fish oils should be consumed.”

    17) Omega-3 supplementation is safe and effective for many inflammation-related conditions and has a low incidence of side effects.

    18) “The US Department of Agriculture has limited fish consumption to 1 fish serving per week in adults and even less in children and pregnant women because of the concern of toxic contaminants such as mercury, polychlorinated biphenyls, and dioxin in our fish population.”

    19) These authors did not recommend the fish oil for those on anticoagulants or fish-related allergies, but noted “aspirin use was not a contraindication.”
    Fish oil:

    what the prescriber needs to know Arthritis Research & Therapy Volume 8, Issue 1, 2006, pp. 402

    Leslie G Cleland, Michael J James and Susanna M Proudman

    FROM ABSTRACT:

    There is a general belief among doctors, that patients with arthritis need nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

    Implicit in this view is that these patients require the symptomatic relief provided by inhibiting synthesis of nociceptive prostaglandin E2, a downstream product of the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase (COX), which is inhibited by NSAIDs.

    However, the concept of ‘safe’ NSAIDs has collapsed following a multiplicity of observations establishing increased risk for cardiovascular events associated with NSAID use, especially but not uniquely with the new COX-2-selective NSAIDs. This mandates greater parsimony in the use of these agents.

    Fish oils contain a natural inhibitor of COX, reduce reliance on NSAIDs, and reduce cardiovascular risk through multiple mechanisms.

    Fish oil thus warrants consideration as a component of therapy for arthritis, especially rheumatoid arthritis, in which its symptomatic benefits are well established.

    A major barrier to the therapeutic use of fish oil in inflammatory diseases is ignorance of its mechanism, range of beneficial effects, safety profile, availability of suitable products, effective dose, latency of effects and instructions for administration. This review provides an evidence-based resource for doctors and patients who may choose to prescribe or take fish oil.

    KEY POINTS FROM AUTHORS

    Cleland, James & Proudman as Published in

    Arthritis Research & Therapy

    1) There is a general belief among doctors that patients with arthritis need nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This is because the pain of arthritis is primarily caused by PGE2, which is derived from the omega-6 fatty acid arachidonic acid through the activity of the enzyme COX. NSAIDs inhibit the COX enzyme.

    2) However, NSAIDs increase the risk for cardiovascular events.

    3) Fish oils contain a natural inhibitor of COX, reduce reliance on NSAIDs, and reduce cardiovascular risk.

    4) Omega-6s (n6) and omega-3s (n3) are dietary essential fatty acids which cannot be synthesized endogenously.

    5) Diets in industrialized Western countries are generally abundant in n6 PUFAs and poor in n3 PUFAs.

    6) “Because Western diets are typically low in LC n3 PUFAs, substantial increases in tissue LC n3 can be achieved by taking a fish oil supplement.”

    7) It is unlikely that one can consume the amount of fish required to achieve anti-inflammatory doses (minimum of 2.7 g/day) of LC n3 PUFAs.

    8) “The conversion of C18 n3 PUFAs [such as flax oil] to C20 and C22 n3 PUFAs [fish oil] occurs relatively inefficiently in humans, and so vegetable sources of dietary n3 PUFAs alone fail to achieve the tissue levels seen with fish oil.”

    9) “EPA [fish oil omega-3] is both an inhibitor of arachidonic acid metabolism and an alternate substrate for COX.”

    10) “EPA [fish oil omega-3] also inhibits the metabolism of arachidonic acid into leukotriene B4 by LOX enzymes, which NSAIDs do not do. Consequently, EPA fish oil is superior to NSAIDs in creating an anti-inflammatory effect.”

    11) “The anti-inflammatory dose of fish oil requires delivery of 2.7 g or more of long chain n3 PUFAs daily.” [Important]

    12) A daily intake of less than 2.7 g eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is “insufficient for an anti-inflammatory effect.”

    13) Symptomatic improvement from fish oil supplementation can take 2–3 months, and “it is important that potential users understand that this delay exists.”

    14) Patients should also reduce ingestion of n6 PUFA by substituting olive oil for vegetable oils.

    15) “At anti-inflammatory doses, cod liver oils, which are rich in the fat-soluble vitamins A and D, contain more vitamin A than recommended intakes.” Vitamin A has been associated with reduced bone density and increased risk for hip fracture.

    16) Vitamin A toxicity is not a problem with anti-inflammatory doses of fish body oils because they contain very little vitamin A.

    17) “Fish oil (obtained from the body of the fish) is preferable to cod liver oil, which can deliver undesirable amounts of vitamin A at anti-inflammatory doses.”

    18) “Within the Western context, fish oil supplements have not been associated with an increased bleeding tendency, even in patients taking aspirin or warfarin for antithrombotic effect.”

    19) “Methylmercury is an industrial contaminant that accumulates in long-lived fish (e.g. swordfish, marlin, sea perch, shark).”

    20) “Methylmercury is a neurotoxin that impairs neural development, especially in the foetus and infants.”

    21) Fish consumption is associated with increased blood and urine mercury.

    22) “Properly processed fish oils contain very little mercury.”

    23) “Chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are byproducts of industrial synthesis of organic chemicals. They are structurally related to dioxins and are potentially toxic.”

    24) PCBs are poorly biodegradable and they accumulate in the land and marine food chains.

    25) Polybrominated biphenyl (PBB) fire retardants are similar to PCBs.

    26) “Halogenated biphenyls can be removed from fish oils by molecular distillation and should be present at low levels in good quality products.”

    27) “In a medical environment in which messages molded by pharmaceutical interests stress the ‘need’ for NSAIDs, prescribers should consider the NSAID-sparing effects, the lack of serious side effects and the positive health benefits of fish oil.”

    “A meta-analysis of the analgesic effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation for inflammatory joint pain” Pain… May 2007, 129(1-2), pp. 210-223

    Robert J. Goldberg and Joel Katz

    Abbreviations:

    ALA Alpha-linolenic acid

    18 carbon long omega-3 plant fatty acid

    EPA Eicosapentaenoic acid

    20 carbon long omega-3 fish fatty acid

    DHA Docosahexaenoic acid

    22 carbon long omega-3 fish fatty acid

    LA Linoleic acid

    18 carbon long omega-6 plant fatty acid

    AA Arachidonic acid

    20 carbon long omega-6 animal fatty acid

    FROM ABSTRACT

    Between 40% and 60% of Americans use complementary and alternative medicine to manage medical conditions, prevent disease, and promote health and well-being.

    Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) have been used to treat joint pain associated with several inflammatory conditions.

    We conducted a meta-analysis of 17 randomized, controlled trials assessing the pain relieving effects of n-3 PUFAs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or joint pain secondary to inflammatory bowel disease and dysmenorrhea.

    Supplementation with n-3 PUFAs for 3–4 months reduces patient reported joint pain intensity, minutes of morning stiffness, number of painful and/or tender joints, and NSAID consumption.

    The results suggest that n-3 PUFAs are an attractive adjunctive treatment for joint pain associated with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and dysmenorrhea.

    KEY POINTS FROM AUTHORS

    Goldberg & Katz as Published in Pain

    1) “Between 40% and 60% of Americans use complementary and alternative medicine to manage medical conditions, prevent disease, and promote health and well-being.”

    2) 33% of those who use complementary medicine cite pain as the primary reason.

    3) “Supplementation with n-3 PUFAs for 3–4 months reduces patient reported joint pain intensity, minutes of morning stiffness, number of painful and/or tender joints, and NSAID consumption.”

    4) Omega-3 PUFAs are an adjunctive treatment for joint pain associated with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and dysmenorrhea.

    5) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with gastrointestinal bleeding and myocardial infarction.

    6) “The typical North American diet is very low in EPA and DHA and conversion is limited from dietary alpha-linolenic acid, found in vegetable oils, to EPA and DHA.”

    7) Fish oil is a rich source of long-chain n-3 PUFAs EPA and DHA.

    8) “In humans, supplementation with fish oil, or EPA/DHA capsules, increases the incorporation of n-3 PUFAs into phospholipids, conferring anti-inflammatory effects.”

    9) The therapeutic effects of n-3 PUFAs usually manifest after approximately 3 months, and “taking n-3 PUFA supplementation for 2 months or less would not benefit significantly.” [Important]

    10) Studies that provided high-dose (more than 2.7 g/day of EPA and DHA) n-3 PUFAs showed greater improvements in morning stiffness and number of painful and/or tender joints compared to low-dose n-3 PUFAs.

    11) “The results of the present meta-analysis support the hypothesis that n-3 PUFA supplementation improves pain outcomes after three months, particularly with respect to patient assessed pain, duration of morning stiffness, number of painful and/or tender joints, and [reduced] NSAID consumption.”

    12) “A minimum of three months of supplementation with a dose of 2.7 g/day of EPA and DHA is required to achieve an anti-inflammatory and a therapeutic effect.” [Important]

    13) “Significant improvements were noted in patient assessed pain and morning stiffness among studies providing high-dose but not low-dose n-3 PUFA supplementation.” [Important]

    14) “Reducing the intake of n-6 fatty acids (e.g., linoleic acid), which are metabolized to arachidonic acid and inflammatory eicosanoids, would be expected to increase the effectiveness of n-3 PUFA supplements.”

    15) EPA/DHA supplements may also be useful for other types of chronic inflammatory pain, such as osteoarthritis or chronic back pain.

    16) Alpha-linolenic acid [flax seed oil, etc.] is poorly converted to EPA and DHA.

    17) This meta-analysis indicates that n-3 PUFA supplementation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or joint pain secondary to inflammatory bowel disease and dysmenorrhea, reduces patient assessed joint pain intensity, morning stiffness, number of painful and/or tender joints, and reduces NSAID consumption.

    Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Athletics

    Current Sports Medicine Reports July 2007, 6:230–236

    Artemis P. Simopoulos, MD

    The Center for Genetics, Nutrition and Health, Washington, DC, USA

    FROM ABSTRACT

    Human beings evolved consuming a diet that contained about equal amounts of n-6 and n-3 essential fatty acids.

    Today, in Western diets, the ratio of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids ranges from approximately 10:1 to 20:1 instead of the traditional range of 1:1 to 2:1.

    Studies indicate that a high intake of n-6 fatty acids shifts the physiologic state to one that is prothrombotic and proaggregatory, characterized by increases in blood viscosity, vasospasm, and vasoconstriction, and decreases in bleeding time.

    N-3 fatty acids, however, have anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, antiarrhythmic, hypolipidemic, and vasodilatory properties.

    Excessive radical formation and trauma during high-intensity exercise leads to an inflammatory state that is made worse by the increased amount of n-6 fatty acids in Western diets, although this can be counteracted by eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

    For the majority of athletes, especially those at the leisure level, general guidelines should include EPA and DHA of about 1 to 2 g/d at a ratio of EPA:DHA of 2:1.

    KEY POINTS FROM AUTHOR

    Simopoulos

    from The Center for Genetics,

    Nutrition and Health, Washington, DC, USA

    1) The human diet has had major changes in the past 150 years, yet the genetic profile has changed very little, if any, in the past 10,000 to 15,000 years.

    2) Human beings evolved consuming a diet that contained about equal amounts of n-6 and n-3 essential fatty acids.

    3) Today, in Western diets, the ratio of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids ranges from approximately 10:1 to 20:1 instead of the traditional range of 1:1 to 2:1.

    4) Excessive free radical formation and trauma during high-intensity exercise leads to an inflammatory state that is made worse by the increased amount of n-6 fatty acids in Western diets, although this can be counteracted by the n-3 fish oils eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

    5) Most athletes should include 1 to 2 g/d EPA / DHA fish oil.

    6) The ratio of EPA:DHA should be 2:1.

    7) Ingestion of EPA and DHA from fish or fish oil leads to:

    A)) Decreased production of prostaglandin E2

    B)) Decreased formation of leukotriene B4, an inducer of inflammation

    8) The increased amounts of n-6 fatty acids in the Western diet increase the eicosanoid metabolic products from arachidonic acid, specifically prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Eicosapentaenoic fish oil is the primary inhibitor of this arachidonic cascade.

    9) “N-3 fatty acids are essential for overall health of the athlete.”

    10) Fish oil concentrates rich in EPA and DHA counteract the effects of the inflammatory state.

    11) “The background diet should be balanced in n-6 and n-3 fatty acids by lowering n-6–rich oils such as corn oil, sunflower, safflower, cottonseed, and soybean oils.”

    12) “Changes and improvements in the background diet and an additional 1 to 2 g/d of EPA and DHA should prevent the inflammation in muscles and joints. For the elite athlete, the above prophylactic measures are essential.”

    13) “Essential fatty acids, both n-6 and n-3, have been part of our diet since the beginning of human life. Before the agricultural revolution 10,000 years ago, humans consumed about equal amounts of both. Over the past 150 years this balance has been upset.”

    14) “Eicosanoids derived from n-6 fatty acids have opposing metabolic properties to those derived from n-3 fatty acids. A balanced intake of both n-6 and n-3 fatty acids is essential for health.”

    A central theme in these articles is that for pain control, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) omega-3 is the most powerfully anti-inflammatory and pain suppressing fatty acid.

    Dr. Artemis P. Simopoulos, MD, (above) from the Center for Genetics, Nutrition and Health, in Washington, DC, advocates a ratio of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) / docosahexaenoic acid of 2/1.

    This same ratio is advocated by biochemist Barry Sears, Ph.D in his two books (The Omega Zone, Regan Books, 2002; The Anti-Inflammation Zone, ReganBooks, 2005) and by Harvard Psychiatry Professor Andrew Stoll, MD, in his book (Omega-3 Connection, Simon & Schuster, 2001).

    Fish oil supplements should be of high quality (purified, pharmaceutical grade, molecular distilled) to remove contaminants that bio-accumulate in fish.

    In addition to fish oil omega-3 supplementation, patients should reduce their consumption of omega-6 fatty acids in their diet.

    APPENDIX – Fatty Acid Components…

    Saturated fatty acids means that each carbon atom is saturated with hydrogen molecules, which means there are no carbon-to-carbon (-C=C-) double bonds.

    Unsaturated fatty acid means that there are one or more carbon-to-carbon double bonds. Each carbon-to-carbon double bond necessitates the removal of two hydrogen atoms. Therefore the fatty acid molecule is referred to as being “unsaturated” with hydrogen atoms.

    An example of a saturated fatty acid is stearic acid. It is 18 carbons long and has no double bonds, and therefore is considered to be “saturated” with hydrogen atoms.

    C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-COOH

    Its chemical formula is 18:0.

    The 18 means it is 18 carbons long. The 0 means there are no double bonds.

    An example of a monosaturated fatty acid is oleic acid, the primary fatty acid found in olive oil. It is also 18 carbons long and has one double bond, making it “monounsaturated.”

    C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C=C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-COOH

    Its chemical formula is 18:1n-9.

    Again the 18 means it is 18 carbons long. The 1 means it has 1 double bond. The n-9 is pronounced “omega-9” and means that the first double bond is located at the ninth carbon from the end methyl group.

    Even though stearic acid and oleic acid are both 18 carbons in length, stearic acid is a solid at room temperature while oleic acid is a liquid (i.e. olive oil). This is because the more double bonds a fatty acid has, the more “fluid” it is. The addition of the single double bond at the ninth carbon is sufficient to change the fatty acid from a solid to a liquid.

    Linoleic acid is an 18 carbon long omega-6 fatty acid. It is the primary fatty acid found in corn oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sunflower oil, peanut oil, and in soybean oil.

    C-C-C-C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-COOH

    Its chemical formula is 18:2n-6.

    Once again, the 18 means it is 18 carbons long. The 2 means it has 2 double bonds. The n-6 is pronounced “omega-6” and means that the first double bond is located at the sixth carbon from the end methyl group.

    Alpha-linolenic acid is an 18 carbon long omega-3 fatty acid. It is the primary fatty acid found in flaxseed oil.

    C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-COOH

    Its chemical formula is 18:3n-3.

    Once again, the 18 means it is 18 carbons long. The 3 means it has 3 double bonds. The n-3 is pronounced “omega-3” and means that the first double bond is located at the third carbon from the end methyl group.

    Biological Enzymatic Processing Of Omega-6 Fatty Acids

    Eighteen carbon long omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids can be enzymatically converted into longer fatty acids with more double bonds. The enzymes that do this are called “elongase” and “desaturase.” This biological enzymatic processing of omega-6 fatty acids basically follows this scheme:

    Biological Enzymatic Processing Of Omega-6 Fatty Acids

    DiHomoGammaLinolenic acid (DHGLA) is a 20-carbon long omega-6 fatty acid.

    C-C-C-C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C-C-C-C-C-COOH

    Its chemical formula is 20:3n-6.

    The 20 means it is 20 carbons long. The 3 means it has 3 double bonds. The n-6 is pronounced “omega-6” and means that the first double bond is located at the sixth carbon from the end methyl group.

    Arachidonic Acid (AA) is a 20-carbon long omega-6 fatty acid. It is the primary fatty acid found in consumable domesticated meat (beef, pork, chicken, turkey, etc.) and eggs.

    C-C-C-C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C-C-COOH

    Its chemical formula is 20:4n-6.

    The 20 means it is 20 carbons long. The 4 means it has 4 double bonds. The n-6 is pronounced “omega-6” and means that the first double bond is located at the sixth carbon from the end methyl group.

    Arachidonic Acid

    Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) is a 20-carbon long omega-3 fatty acid. It is the primary fatty acid found in fish oil.

    C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C-C-COOH

    Its chemical formula is 20:5n-3.

    The 20 means it is 20 carbons long. The 5 means it has 5 double bonds. The n-3 is pronounced “omega-3” and means that the first double bond is located at the third carbon from the end methyl group.

    Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is a 22-carbon long omega-3 fatty acid. It is also primarily found in fish oil, yet there are algae sources as well.

    C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C=C-C-C-COOH

    Its chemical formula is 22:6n-3.

    The 22 means it is 22 carbons long. The 6 means it has 6 double bonds. The n-3 is pronounced “omega-3” and again means that the first double bond is located at the third carbon from the end methyl group.

  • A Review Of The Literature

    A Review Of The Literature

    Back Pain, Acute Soft Tissue Injuries, Mobilization, & Fibromyalgia A Review Of The Literature

    Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. Oct. 1986;18(5):489-500.

    John Kellett

    FROM ABSTRACT:

    The pathological processes [of soft tissue injury and repair] at a cellular level are described in three phases: acute inflammatory, repair, and remodelling.

    The management of acute soft tissue trauma is embodied in the acronym RICE for rest, ice, compression, and elevation during the first 48 to 72 h.

    Additional benefit from anti-prostaglandin medications has not been clearly demonstrated in clinical trials, and if used, these medications should be restricted to the first 3 days.

    Cryotherapy (crushed ice) for 10 to 20 min, 2 to 4 times/day for the first 2 to 3 days is helpful in promoting early return to full activity.

    Early mobilization, guided by the pain response, promotes a more rapid return to full activity.

    Early mobilization, guided by the pain response, promotes a more rapid return to full functional recovery.

    Progressive resistance exercises (isotonic, isokinetic, and isometric) are essential to restore full muscle and joint function.

    Rehabilitation is complete when the injured and adjacent tissues are restored to full pain-free functional capacity under competitive conditions in association with the necessary level of cardiovascular respiratory fitness.

    THIS AUTHOR ALSO NOTES:

    A common classification of soft tissue injuries is based on severity:

    1) Grade 1 (first degree)

    “Mild pain at the time of injury or within 24 h of injury, especially when stress is applies to the injury; local tenderness may or may not be present.”

    2) Grade 2 (second degree)

    “The person notices pain during activity and usually has to stop; pain and local tenderness are moderate to severe when the injury is stressed.”

    3) Grade 3 (third degree)

    “Complete or near complete rupture or avulsion of at least a portion of a ligament or tendon with severe pain or loss of function; a palpable defect may be present; stressing a ruptured ligament may, paradoxically, be painless due to the loss of continuity of the tissue.”

    In a third degree ligament sprain, “the ligament may appear intact macroscopically yet have complete loss of load-carrying ability.”

    Third degree ligament injury may require surgical management.

    In inter-muscular hematoma, the blood tracks distally from the site of injury and appears as a bruise some distance from the site of injury, after some time.

    Intra-muscular hematoma remains confined by epimysium and may take three times longer to heal than inter-muscular hematoma.

    In ligaments, microscopic collagen fiber failure begins at 7 to 8% strain.

    Ligament strain greater than 7 to 8% results in failure of the ligament to resume its original length after removal of the load (plastic deformation), and to more extensive collagen failure.

    Ligaments strains as high as 20 to 40% can occur before signs of failure are apparent.

    “Continuity of ligaments may be macroscopically apparent (e.g. arthroscopically) even with complete loss of the load-carrying capacity of the ligament.”

    “The micropathology of acute soft tissue trauma has been investigated. Healing of ligaments and soft tissue injuries in general has been shown to occur by fibrous repair (scar tissue) and not by regeneration of the damaged tissue.”

    [The Fibrosis Of Repair]

    The phases of soft tissue injury repair are:

    Phase 1:

    The Acute Inflammatory or Reaction Phase.

    Lasts up to 72 hours.

    Characterized by vasodilation, immune system activation of phagocytosis to remove debris, the release of prostaglandins and inflammation.

    Prostaglandins play a prominent part in pain production and increased capillary permeability (swelling).

    The wound is hypoxic, but macrophages can perform the phagocytosis duties anaerobically.

    Phase 2:

    The Repair or Regeneration Phase.

    48 hours to 6 weeks.

    Characterized by the synthesis and deposition of collagen.

    The collagen that is deposited is “not fully oriented in the direction of tensile strength.

    Collagen fibers tend to contract between 3 and 14 weeks after injury, and perhaps for as long as 6 months, decreasing tissue elasticity. [This is probably why we note reduced range of motion during this phase.]

    This phase is “largely one of increasing the quantity of the collagen” but this collagen is not laid down in the direction of stress.

    Phase 3:

    The Remodeling Phase.

    This phase may last up to “12 months or more.”

    “The collagen is remodeled to increase the functional capabilities of the tendon or ligament to withstand the stresses imposed upon it.”

    “It appears that the tensile strength of the collagen is quite specific to the forces imposed on it during the remodeling phase: i.e. the maximum strength will be in the direction of the forces imposed on the ligament.” [This could argue for the need for specific line-of-drive joint adjustments.] This phase is largely “an improvement of the quality” (orientation and tensile strength) of the collagen.

    “Normal ligaments are composed of type I collagen, whereas damaged (and healed) ligaments contain a large proportion of immature type III collagen which is deficient in the number of cross-linkages between and within the tropocollagen subunits.”

    The remodeled scar is deficient in both content and quality 40 weeks after injury, as there is a plateau in scar collagen concentration at about 70% of normal.

    Acute inflammation is beneficial when one has acute infection. However, the “acute inflammatory phase of the body’s response to trauma is apparently of no benefit.” [Most Important]

    “Numerous studies have shown the effectiveness of ice therapy in reducing the pain and period of disability to soft tissue injuries.”(4 references)[Important]

    In contrast, “early heat treatment leads to an increase in the blood flow to the injured area with an exaggerated acute inflammatory response.” [Important]

    “The advantages of cryotherapy in treating soft tissue injuries have been well documented.” Ice within 48 hours of injury reduces disability of ankle sprains from 15 days to 10 days.

    Cryotherapy is superior to heat, especially when applied within 24 hours of injury.

    Cryotherapy should be limited to a maximum duration of 30 minutes.

    “The use of anti-prostaglandin medications or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the management of acute soft tissue injury has become increasingly common in recent years despite a lack of adequate clinical studies to support such a practice.” [Important]

    Prostaglandins, especially E2, are responsible for the acute inflammatory response to trauma. [Very Important]

    The use of anti-prostaglandin medications or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be used for no more than 72 hours or they become detrimental to the second phase of healing. [Important]

    “It is well to remember that all of these types of medications have adverse effects, some minor (e.g. gastrointestinal intolerance) and some major (e.g. fatalities from bone marrow suppression).” [This is really important: common pain drugs suppress the bone marrow, the sole producer of immune system cells. In another context, taking these pain drugs when suffering from colds or flu would suppress the immune system’s ability to neutralize the pathogens.] The use of these drugs “should be restricted to a maximum of 3 days following injury.”

    Corticosteroids have been shown to cause destructive changes in articular cartilage. “Steroids have a deleterious effect on collagen and direct injection into collagen may produce a permanent decrease in tensile strength.” The use of steroids for soft tissue injury has “no sound biological basis.” Steroids delay collagen repair. Steroids “retard fibroblastic activity and may well delay healing.” “Corticosteroids have little part to play in the management of soft tissue injuries.”

    BENEFITS OF EARLY MOBILIZATION

    1) Improvement of bone and ligament strength, reducing recurrence of injury.

    2) The strength of repaired ligaments is proportional to the mobility of the ligament, resulting in larger diameter collagen fiber bundles and more total collagen.

    3) “Collagen fiber growth and realignment can be stimulated by early tensile loading of muscle, tendon, and ligament.” [Important]

    4) Collagen formation is not confined to the healing ligaments, but adheres to surrounding tissues. The formation of these adhesions between repairing tissues and adjacent structures is minimized by early movement.

    5) With motion, “joint proprioception is maintained or develops earlier after injury, and this may be of importance in preventing recurrences of injuries and in hastening full recovery to competitive fitness.” [Important, especially for chiropractors]

    6) The nutrition to the cartilage is better maintained with early mobilization.

    ADVERSENESS OF IMMOBILIZATION

    1) A decrease in aerobic capacity.

    2) Muscle wasting and loss of strength.

    3) One study showed that 8 weeks of immobilization of the anterior cruciate ligament delayed the return to full tensile strength for more than one year.

    4) “Immobilization leads to a higher incidence of avulsion fractures of bony attachments of ligaments rather than ligament failure.” [Important]

    MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS:

    1) “The principles of management of acute soft tissue injuries have been embodied in the acronym RICE (for rest, ice, compression, and elevation) during the first 48 to 72 hours following injury.”

    2) Following this acute inflammatory phase and largely guided by the pain response of the patient, early mobilization is commenced, based upon the premise that the stress of movement on repairing collagen is largely responsible for the orientation and tensile strength of the tendons and ligaments.

    3) The goal of stressing repairing tissues with controlled motion is to induce adaptive response of functionally stronger connective tissues. However, excessive stressing of the repairing tissues may result in further damage. Consequently, any sign or symptom which suggests a worsening of the injury (severe pain) is a clear indication to reduce the motion stress on the tissues.

    4) “The masking of such symptoms by analgesics is contraindicated.” [Important]

    5) Drinking alcohol increases local hemorrhage and the acute inflammatory response, and should therefore be avoided.

    KEY POINTS FROM DAN MURPHY

    1) Ligaments collagen fibers begin to fail at 7 to 8% strain.

    2) Ligament strains as high as 20 to 40% can occur before signs of failure are apparent.

    3) The healing of ligaments and soft tissue injuries in general has been shown to occur by fibrous repair or scar tissue, [The Fibrosis Of Repair] and not by regeneration of the damaged tissue.

    4) There are three primary phases of soft tissue injury repair:

    A) Phase 1, The Acute Inflammatory or Reaction Phase.

    Lasts up to 72 hours, is characterized by pain and swelling, and mediated primarily by prostaglandin E2.

    B) Phase 2, The Repair or Regeneration Phase.

    48 hours to 6 weeks, characterized by the synthesis and deposition of collagen, but this collagen is not fully oriented in the direction of tensile strength.

    C) Phase 3, The Remodeling Phase.

    This phase may last up to “12 months or more.”

    “The collagen is remodeled to increase the functional capabilities to withstand the stresses imposed upon it;” this remodeling occurs in response to specific forces applied to the tissues.

    5) Healed ligaments still have problems. There are residual weaknesses as compared to normal ligaments because of reduced cross-linkages and a plateau in scar collagen concentration at about 70% of normal.

    6) When one has an infection, acute inflammation is beneficial because it helps the body neutralize the pathogen. However, the “acute inflammatory phase of the body’s response to trauma is apparently of no benefit,” and results in adverse fibrosis. Early management should therefore include ice, not heat.

    7) The use of anti-prostaglandin medications or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the management of acute soft tissue injury should NOT be used for more than 72 hours or they become detrimental to the second phase of healing. [Important]

    8) Common pain drugs suppress the bone marrow [production of immune system cells]. [This is really important]

    9) Corticosteroids damage articular cartilage, weaken the collagen repair, delay collagen repair, produce a permanent decrease in collagen strength, and should therefore never be used in the management of soft tissue injuries.

    10) Early mobilization of soft tissue injuries improves the healing of bone, cartilage, tendon, ligament; reduces the adverseness of adhesions, and restores joint proprioception.

    11) Immobilization of soft tissue injures decreases aerobic capacity, causes muscle wasting and loss of strength that may delay full recovery for a year or more.

    Chiropractic Adjuncts To Managing Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome

    Fibromyalgia Syndrome is the third most commonly diagnosed rheumatologic disorder, following osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Fibromyalgia is characterized by widespread pain and tenderness, fatigue, morning stiffness, and sleep disturbance. Fibromyalgia is often disabling. Fibromyalgia is often treatment resistant. Fibromyalgia can be triggered by trauma (Greenfield, Waylonis, Buskila, Neumann). Studies report that between 25% and 50% of subjects with fibromyalgia recall physical trauma immediately prior the onset of their symptoms (Al-Allaf).

    Chiropractors usually manage patients with fibromyalgia by attempting to enhance the quality of mechanical neurological afferentation by improving the sagittal and horizontal planes of spinal posture and motion. However, these efforts will often worsen patient symptoms, at least temporarily.

    This article reviews several adjunct approaches to the management of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.

    MALIC ACID and MAGNESIUM

    In 1992, Abraham and Flechas propose that fibromyalgia is caused by a deficiency of substances needed for ATP synthesis. The nociceptive nervous system requires a steady flow of ATP to remain subthreshold. Therefore, reductions in ATP supplies could account for the lowered pain thresholds that fibromyalgia patients experience.

    Abraham and Flechas explain the synergistic role of magnesium and malic acid in the genesis of ATP. They detail the biochemistry of how reductions in magnesium and malic acid would result in APT deficiency.

    Abraham and Flechas then treat 15 fibromyalgia patients with daily 300-600 mg of magnesium plus 1200-2400 mg malic acid. “All patients reported significant subjective improvement of pain within 48 hours of starting” supplementation.

    In 1995, Russell et al in a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study, also used magnesium and malic acid to treat 29 patients with fibromyalgia, noting “significant reductions in the severity of all 3 primary pain/tenderness measures were observed.” Better results were observed in those taking 600 mg of magnesium and 2400 mg of malic acid, as compared to those who took lower doses. The authors note that this supplementation should continue for al least 2 months, and often for as long as 6 months.

    THE SEROTONIN PATHWAY

    In 2004, Borut Banic and colleagues, writing in the journal Neurology, present extensive evidence suggesting that fibromyalgia is the consequence of reduced levels of the brain neurotransmitter serotonin.

    In 1998, osteopath John H Juhl also proposed that fibromyalgia could be related to reduced serotonin. He notes that researchers have found low serum levels of serotonin in fibromyalgia patients. Low serum serotonin levels have been found to have an inverse correlation with clinical measures of pain.

    The serotonin pathway begins with the essential amino acid tryptophan.

    Tryptophan is the least common of the 8 essential amino acids, accounting for about 1% of protein content.

    After absorption, about 90% of tryptophan is used at the peripheral tissues for protein synthesis.

    About 9% of absorbed tryptophan is used to produce niacin. The RDA for niacin is 15 mg. It takes 60 mg of tryptophan to produce 1 mg of niacin. This is important, because if niacin levels are adequate in the diet, the body will not need to use this 9% to make niacin.

    In fact, the higher the dietary levels of niacin, the less tryptophan is converted to this pathway. This increases the tryptophan available to be converted to serotonin.

    About 1% of absorbed tryptophan is converted to serotonin.

    In the body, tryptophan is converted to 5-hydroxy-tryptophan (5-HPT). 5-HTP easily crosses the blood-brain barrier for conversion to serotonin in the central nervous system. The conversion of 5-HPT to serotonin requires vitamin B6. Consequently, inadequate levels of B6 impair the conversion of tryptophan to serotonin.

    Currently, tryptophan is available by prescription only in the United States. However, 5-HTP is sold, and as noted above, still crosses the blood brain barrier for conversion to serotonin. Commercially, 5-HTP is extracted from the seeds of Grifonia simplicifolia, a plant grown in West Africa.

    Dr. Juhl notes 2 published studies where supplementation of 5-HTP in the dose of 100 mg 3 times per day in patients with fibromyalgia resulted in significant improvement of clinical symptoms after 30-90 days. The effective daily dose range appears to be 200-1000 mg total per day, and that it should be taken with meals.

    These patients should also be given vitamin B6 to increase conversion of 5-HTP to serotonin, and niacinamide to inhibit the need for tryptophan to convert to niacin.

    tryptophan converted to niacin

    Dr. Rodger Murphree supports the tryptophan to 5HTP to serotonin pathway noted by Dr. Juhl. In his 2003 book titled Treating and beating Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Dr. Murphree suggests supplementing with 100-300 mg of 5HTP on an empty stomach 30 minutes before bed. He notes that it can take several nights to two weeks before supplementing with 5HTP starts to work.

    LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY

    Below are 3 studies that show significant benefit to management of chronic pain and fibromyalgia using low-level laser therapy. The first article is by Green, et al in 2000. The authors claim excellent positive therapeutic results in treating patients with chronic painful diabetic neuropathy, chronic myofascial pain, or complex regional pain syndrome.

    Green et al conclude, “It appears that photon stimulation carries with it a significant potential for amelioration of chronic pain in which autonomic and neurovascular abnormalities are, in fact, present.”

    The second article is a randomized controlled clinical trial done in 2002 by Gur et al on patients with fibromyalgia. The laser group of patients were treated for 3 minutes at each tender point daily for 2 weeks. The authors note “Significant improvements were indicated in all clinical parameters in the laser group,” and that “laser therapy can be used as a monotherapy or as a supplementary treatment to other therapeutic procedures in fibromyalgia.”

    Gur and others also publish the third article published in 2002. It is a single-blinded placebo-controlled trial of low power laser therapy in 40 female patients with fibromyalgia. The authors note that there was a “significant difference was in parameters as pain, muscle spasm, morning stiffness and tender point numbers in favour of laser group.” These authors conclude “Our study suggests that laser therapy is effective on pain, muscle spasm, morning stiffness, and total tender point number in fibromyalgia and suggests that this therapy method is a safe and effective way of treatment in the cases with fibromyalgia.”

    According to Jan Tuner, and Lars Hode’s 2002 text titled Laser Therapy, Clinical Practice and Scientific Background, the first low level laser to be awarded 510K market clearance by the United States Food and Drug Administration is from Erchonia Medical. Erchonia medical is located in McKinney, TX: (888) 242-0571.

    According to a book chapter titled “Low-Power Laser Therapy” by Tina Karu, low-level laser therapy physiologically increases the mitochondrial production on cellular energy ATP. This is similar to the proposed mechanism of supplementing with malic acid and magnesium, as noted above.

    EXCITOTOXINS

    Below are listed 5 books that deal extensively with dietary excitotoxins and their deleterious effects on human physiology. These deleterious effects include chronic fibromyalgia pain because dietary excitotoxins also function as excitatory neurotransmitters for chronic pain (Dickenson).

    In a nutshell, dietary excitotoxins are added to food because they function as excitatory neurotransmitters, enhancing the flavor of food. The two main dietary excitotoxins are glutamate (often labeled monosodium glutamate or MSG, and aspartame because it is metabolized to the excitotoxin aspartate).

    In excess, these substances can literally excite neurons to death, and therefore have been associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases, as well as a plethora of other symptoms, including fibromyalgia chronic pain. Unfortunately, excitotoxins such as glutamate can have dozens of names on food labels.

    In 2001, Smith reports on 4 cases of chronic pain fibromyalgia patients who where successfully treated after avoiding all products that contain the excitotoxins glutamate and aspartame. Some of these patients had suffered for as long as 17 years, and were taking as many as 13 different drugs for their symptoms.

    Smith notes the following:

    “Excitotoxins are molecules, such as MSG and aspartate that act as excitatory neurotransmitters, and can lead to neurotoxicity when used in excess.”

    “MSG, the sodium salt of the amino acid glutamic acid or glutamate, is an additive used to enhance the flavor of certain foods.”

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) grandfathered MSG, like salt and baking powder, as harmless food substances in 1959.

    Aspartame was first marketed in 1981, and is a dipeptide of aspartate and phenylalanine used in foods, beverages, and drugs.

    “In animal models, aspartame has been associated with an increased incidence of brain tumors.”

    “Anecdotally, aspartame use in humans has been linked with head aches, seizures, dizziness, movement disorders, urticaria, angioedema, and anaphylaxis.”

    “Much of the research performed proving that glutamate was safe for human consumption may have been flawed.”

    Glutamate has a role in chronic pain sensitization:

    “MSG is nearly ubiquitous in processed food, appearing under many names, including gelatin, hydrolyzed vegetable protein, textured protein, and yeast extract.”

    Aspartame is the dominant artificial sweetener on the market since 1981.

    Fibromyalgia can be caused by exposure to dietary excitotoxins in susceptible individuals.

    Aspartate and glutamate taken together have additive neurotoxic effects.

    The elimination of MSG and other excitotoxins from the diets of patients with fibromyalgia offers a benign treatment option that has the potential for dramatic results in a subset of patients.

    There are dozens of names for glutamate as it is added to foods. A partial list of names seen on food packaging are listed below, from the website www.truthinlabeling.org:

    HIDDEN SOURCES OF PROCESSED FREE GLUTAMIC ACID (MSG)
    Autolyzed, hydrolyzed, glutamate, glutamic acid, hydrolyzed, autolyzed

    NAMES OF INGREDIENTS THAT CONTAIN ENOUGH MSG TO SERVE AS COMMON MSG-REACTION TRIGGERS

    The MSG-reaction is a reaction to free glutamic acid that occurs in food as a consequence of manufacture. MSG-sensitive people do not react to protein (which contains bound glutamic acid) or any of the minute amounts of free glutamic acid that might be found in unadulterated, unfermented, food.

    These ALWAYS contain MSG
    Glutamate
    Glutamic acid
    Gelatin
    Monosodium glutamate
    Calcium caseinate
    Textured protein
    Monopotassium glutamate
    Sodium caseinate
    Yeast nutrient
    Yeast extract
    Yeast food
    Autolyzed yeast
    Hydrolyzed protein (any protein that is hydrolyzed) Hydrolyzed corn gluten

    These OFTEN contain MSG or create MSG during processing

    Carrageenan
    Maltodextrin
    Malt extract
    Natural pork flavoring
    Citric acid Malt flavoring
    Bouillon and Broth Natural chicken flavoring Soy protein isolate
    Natural beef flavoring
    Ultra-pasteurized Soy sauce
    Stock Barley malt
    Soy sauce extract
    Whey protein concentrate Pectin
    Soy protein
    Whey protein Protease
    Soy protein concentrate
    Whey protein isolate
    Protease enzymes
    Anything protein fortified
    Flavors(s) & Flavoring(s)
    Anything fermented Anything enzyme modified
    Enzymes anything
    Seasonings Natural flavor & flavoring (the word “seasonings”)

    The website further notes that “The new game is to label hydrolyzed proteins as pea protein, whey protein, corn protein, etc. If a pea, for example, were whole, it would be identified as a pea. Calling an ingredient pea protein indicates that the pea has been hydrolyzed, at least in part, and that processed free glutamic acid (MSG) is present.”

    “MSG reactions have been reported to soaps, shampoos, hair conditioners, and cosmetics, where MSG is hidden in ingredients that include the words ‘hydrolyzed,’ ‘amino acids,’ and ‘protein.’ Low fat and no fat milk products often include milk solids that contain MSG. Drinks, candy, and chewing gum are potential sources of hidden MSG and of aspartame and neotame.”

    “Aspartic acid, found in neotame and aspartame (NutraSweet), ordinarily causes MSG type reactions in MSG sensitive people. Aspartame is found in some medications, including children’s medications.”

    “According to the manufacturer, Varivax–Merck chicken pox vaccine (Varicella Virus Live), contains L-monosodium glutamate and hydrolyzed gelatin both of which contain processed free glutamic acid (MSG) which cause brain lesions in young laboratory animals, and cause endocrine disturbances like obesity and reproductive disorders later in life. It would appear that most, if not all, live virus vaccines contain MSG.”

    Fibromyalgia patients are often quite resistant to traditional treatment approaches. Today’s chiropractors used all or some of the above adjuncts, along with traditional joint adjusting, tissue work, postural improvement and exercise. Most patients so treated experience substantial benefit and achieve acceptable clinical improvement.

    REFERENCES

    Abraham GE, Flechas JD. Management of Fibromyalgia: Rationale for the Use of Magnesium and Malic Acid. J of Nutritional Med. 1992 (3) 49-59.

    A. W. Al-Allaf, K. L. Dunbar, N. S. Hallum, B. Nosratzadeh, K. D. Templeton and

    T. Pullar. A case–control study examining the role of physical trauma in the onset of fibromyalgia syndrome Rheumatology 2002; 41: 450-453.

    Borut Banic, Steen Petersen-Felix, Ole K. Andersen, Bogdan P. Radanov, P. M. Villiger, Lars Arendt-Nielse and Michele Curatolo. Evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia. Pain. January 2004, Pages 7-15.

    Buskila D, Neumann L, Vaisberg G, Alkalay D, Wolfe F. Increased rates of fibromyalgia following cervical spine injury. A controlled study of 161 cases of traumatic injury. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Mar;40(3):446-52.

    Dickenson AH. Gate Control Theory of pain stands the test of time British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 88, No. 6, June 2002, Pgs. 755-757.

    Green J, Fralicker D, Clewell W, Horowitz E, Lucey T, Yannacone V, Haber C. INFRARED PHOTON STIMULATION: A NEW FORM OF CHRONIC PAIN

    THERAPY. American Journal of Pain Management, Vol. 10, No. 3 July 2000,113-120;

    Greenfield S, Fitzcharles MA, Esdaile JM. Reactive fibromyalgia syndrome.

    Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Jun;35(6):678-81.

    Gur A, Karakoc M, Nas K, Cevik R, Sarac J, Ataoglu S. Effects of low power laser and low dose amitriptyline therapy on clinical symptoms and quality of life in fibromyalgia: a single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatol Int. 2002 Sep;22(5):188-93.

    Gur A, Karakoc M, Nas K, Cevik R, Sarac J, Demir E. Efficacy of low power laser therapy in fibromyalgia: a single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2002;17(1):57-61.

    Juhl JH, (1998-10-01). “Fibromyalgia and the serotonin pathway”,

    Altern Med Rev;3(5):367-75.

    Karu, Tina, “Low-Power Laser Therapy”, Chapter 48 in Biomedical Photonics Handbook, Tuan Vo-Dinh, CRS Press, 2003.

    Murphree, Rodger, Treating and beating Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, The Definitive Guide for Patients and Physicians, Harrison and Hampton Publishing, 2003.

    Neumann L, Zeldets V, Bolotin A, Buskila D. Outcome of posttraumatic fibromyalgia: A 3-year follow-up of 78 cases of cervical spine injuries.

    Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr;32(5):320-5.

    Russell IJ, Michalek JE, Flechas JD, Abraham GE. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with Super Malic: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover pilot study. J Rheumatol. 1995 May;22(5):953-8.

    Smith JD, Terpening CM, Schmidt SOF, Gums JG. Relief of Fibromyalgia Symptoms Following Discontinuation of Dietary Excitotoxins The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 702–706. June 2001

    Tuner, Jan and Hode, Lars, Laser Therapy, Clinical Practice and Scientific Background, Prima Books, 2002.

    Waylonis GW, Perkins RH. Post-traumatic fibromyalgia. A long-term follow-up.

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Nov-Dec;73(6):403-12.

    Excitotoxin Books

    Excitotoxins, The Taste That Kills by Russell Blaylock (University of Mississippi neurosurgeon), Health Press, 1997

    In Bad Taste, The MSG Symptom Complex, by George Schwartz, Health Press, 1999

    The Crazy Makers, How the Food Industry Is Destroying Our Brains and Harming Our Children, by Carol Simontacchi, Tarcher Putnam, 2000

    Food Allergies by William Walsh, Wiley, 2000

    Health and Nutrition Secrets by Russell Blaylock, Heath press, 2006

    Fibromyalgia Article Summary

    A case–control study examining the role of physical
    trauma in the onset of fibromyalgia syndrome
    Rheumatology 2002; 41: 450-453

     

    A. W. Al-Allaf, K. L. Dunbar, N. S. Hallum, B. Nosratzadeh, K. D. Templeton and

    T. Pullar

    FROM ABSTRACT

    Objective.

    To investigate whether physical trauma may precipitate the onset of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

    Design.

    A case–control study was carried out to compare fibromyalgia out-patients with controls attending non-rheumatology out-patient clinics.

    Method.

    136 FMS patients and 152 age- and sex-matched controls completed a postal questionnaire about any physical trauma in the 6 months before the onset of their symptoms.

    Results.

    Fifty-three (39%) FMS patients reported significant physical trauma in the 6 months before the onset of their disease, compared with only 36 (24%) of controls (P<0.007).

    There was no significant difference between FMS patients who had a history of physical trauma and those who did not have physical trauma with regard to age, sex, disease duration, employment status and whether their job at onset was manual.

    Conclusion.

    Physical trauma in the preceding 6 months is significantly associated with the onset of FMS.

    KEY POINTS

    (1) Fibromyalgia is the 3rd or 4th most common rheumatological referral.

    (2) 2% of the population has fibromyalgia, primarily in women.

    (3) Physical trauma is a significantly etiological trigger for FMS onset.

    (4) 25% to 50% of those with FMS note physical trauma immediately prior the onset.

    (5) The risk of developing FMS is more than 10-fold higher in adults with neck injuries than in other adults (1997 study).

    (6) Those who develop FMS after trauma may be “genetically predisposed.”

    (7) Physical trauma is also increases the risk for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and ankylosing spondylitis.

    Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with Super Malic:
    a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover pilot study
    Journal of Rheumatology, May 1995;22(5):953-8

    Russell IJ, Michalek JE, Flechas JD, Abraham GE.

    FROM ABSTRACT

    OBJECTIVE.

    To study the efficacy and safety of Super Malic, a proprietary tablet containing malic acid (200 mg) and magnesium (50 mg), in treatment of primary fibromyalgia syndrome.

    The 3 primary outcome variables were measures of pain and tenderness but functional and psychological measures were also assessed.

    RESULTS.

    With dose escalation and a longer duration of treatment in the open label trial, significant reductions in the severity of all 3 primary pain/tenderness measures were obtained without limiting risks.

    CONCLUSIONS.

    These data suggest that Super Malic is safe and may be beneficial in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia.

    KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE

    1) An explanation for the soft tissue pain experienced by patients with fibromyalgia was that muscle energy production of ATP may be compromised.

    2) Also, abnormal blood flow may deprive muscle of sufficient oxygen and other nutrients.

    3) The muscles of patients with fibromyalgia are deficient in ATP and magnesium.

    4) Malic acid and magnesium “play a pivotal role in mitochondrial ATP synthesis.”

    5) Malic acid is “widely distributed in the vegetable kingdom including concentrations of 4 to 8 g/l of apple juice.”

    6) Malic acid plus magnesium can increase mitochondrial production of ATP energy.

    7) The best results were observed from “use of a higher dosage and longer duration of treatment” with malic acid and magnesium.

    8) Study results “indicate that it may be beneficial on the painful fibromyalgia symptoms in dosages in excess of 8 tablets/day for up to 6 months.”

    [8 tablets X 200 mg per tablet = 1600 mg malic acid per day]

    [8 tablets X 50 mg per tablet = 400 mg magnesium per day]

    9) The proposed mechanism for the benefit of malic acid plus magnesium supplementation is that they “increase production of ATP.”

    Evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia

    Pain, January 2004, Pages 7-15

    Borut Banic, Steen Petersen-Felix, Ole K. Andersen, Bogdan P. Radanov, P. M. Villiger, Lars Arendt-Nielse and Michele Curatolo
    FROM ABSTRACT:

    Patients with chronic pain after whiplash injury and fibromyalgia patients display exaggerated pain after sensory stimulation.

    Because evident tissue damage is usually lacking, this exaggerated pain perception could be explained by hyperexcitability of the central nervous system.

    The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (a spinal reflex) may be used to study the excitability state of spinal cord neurons.

    We tested the hypothesis that patients with chronic whiplash pain and fibromyalgia display facilitated withdrawal reflex and therefore spinal cord hypersensitivity.

    Three groups were studied: whiplash (n=27), fibromyalgia (n=22) and healthy controls (n=29).

    Two types of transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the sural nerve were applied: single stimulus and five repeated stimuli at 2 Hz. Electromyography was recorded from the biceps femoris muscle. The main outcome measurement was the minimum current intensity eliciting a spinal reflex (reflex threshold).

    Reflex thresholds were significantly lower in the whiplash compared with the control group, after both single and repeated stimulation.

    The same was observed for the fibromyalgia group, after both stimulation modalities.

    We provide evidence for spinal cord hyperexcitability in patients with chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia patients.

    This can cause exaggerated pain following low intensity nociceptive or innocuous peripheral stimulation.

    Spinal hypersensitivity may explain, at least in part, pain in the absence of detectable tissue damage.

    KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE

    1) Whiplash causes tissue damage.

    2) This tissue damage is not recognized by available diagnostic procedures.

    3) Whiplash tissue damage produces inflammation.

    4) This inflammation alters the thresholds of the nociceptive afferent system, increasing pain.

    5) This inflammation also induces a gene expression in the dorsal root ganglion resulting in increased peripheral receptor fields. [Receptive Field Enlargement]

    This also increases pain.

    6) This inflammation also increases the expression (production) of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in the spinal cord, which is an enzyme that converts the omega-6 fatty acid arachidonic acid into the pro-inflammatory eicosanoid prostaglandin E2. The pro-inflammatory eicosanoid prostaglandin E2 further alters the thresholds of the nociceptive afferent system, sending more pain afferentation into the spinal cord.

    7) This increased COX-2 expression is not confined to the neural structures connected to the site of inflammation, but is observed in the whole spinal cord and in supraspinal centers. This alters the pain sensitivity of the entire body, including non-injured regions.

    8) All of this induces profound plasticity changes [synaptogenesis/neuroplasticity] in the spinal cord that result in increased pain that can persist after all possible tissue healing has occurred.

    9) Some of these spinal plastic changes may be irreversible (permanent chronic pain syndromes).

    10) This article objectively proves that patients with chronic pain have hypersensitivity of the spinal cord neurons.

    11) The absence of evident tissue damage does not necessarily mean that there is no tissue damage.

    12) Elevated levels of excitatory amino acids, like glutamate, are often found in the cerebrospinal fluid of chronic pain patients, and cause generalized spinal cord hyperexcitability.

    14) Serotonin inhibits pain and inhibits depression. Reduced serotonin may explain while chronic pain patients often suffer from psychological distress.

    Relief of Fibromyalgia Symptoms Following Discontinuation of Dietary Excitotoxins

    The Annals of Pharmacotherapy: Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 702–706.

    June 2001

     

    Jerry D Smith, Chris M Terpening, Siegfried OF Schmidt and John G Gums

    FROM ABSTRACT:

    BACKGROUND:

    Fibromyalgia is a common rheumatologic disorder that is often difficult to treat effectively.

    CASE SUMMARY:

    Four patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome for two to 17 years are described. All had undergone multiple treatment modalities with limited success.

    All had complete, or nearly complete, resolution of their symptoms within months after eliminating monosodium glutamate (MSG) or MSG plus aspartame from their diet.

    All patients were women with multiple comorbidities prior to elimination of MSG.

    All have had recurrence of symptoms whenever MSG is ingested.

    DISCUSSION:

    Excitotoxins are molecules, such as MSG and aspartate that act as excitatory neurotransmitters, and can lead to neurotoxicity when used in excess.

    We propose that these four patients may represent a subset of fibromyalgia syndrome that is induced or exacerbated by excitotoxins or, alternatively, may comprise an excitotoxin syndrome that is similar to fibromyalgia.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    The elimination of MSG and other excitotoxins from the diets of patients with fibromyalgia offers a benign treatment option that has the potential for dramatic results in a subset of patients.

    KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE:

    1) Fibromyalgia is common difficult to treat.

    2) Fibromyalgia can be caused by exposure to dietary excitotoxins in susceptible individuals.

    3) Excitotoxins are molecules, such as MSG and aspartate, that act as excitatory neurotransmitters.

    4) MSG is found in nearly all processed food and can have many names, including gelatin, hydrolyzed vegetable protein, textured protein, and yeast extract.”

    5) Aspartame is the dominant artificial sweetener on the market since 1981.

    6) Glutamate and other dietary excitotoxins primarily enter the brain at the hypothalamus that is not well protected by the blood-brain barrier.

    7) Glutamate is the neurotransmitter that causes dorsal horn spinal cord chronic pain sensitization.

    8) Aspartate and glutamate taken together have additive neurotoxic effects.

    9) Much of the research done to show that glutamate was safe for human consumption may have been flawed.

    10) The elimination of MSG and other excitotoxins from the diets of patients with fibromyalgia offers a benign treatment option that has the potential for dramatic results in a subset of patients.

  • Whiplash Trauma, Alar Ligament Injury, and Chronic Neck Pain

    Whiplash Trauma, Alar Ligament Injury, and Chronic Neck Pain

    The primary region of the human body to be injured in a whiplash accident is the neck. The whiplash injury is an inertial injury to the neck. This means that there is no direct impact, blow, or contact to the neck. Rather, the injury is indirect, and there is no contact. Another well-known example of a neck inertial injury is “shaken baby syndrome.” The injury to the baby’s neck is indirect, or inertial.

    During the whiplash mechanism, two large pieces of inertial mass, the head and the trunk, tend to move in opposite directions. As an example, in a rear end collision, the trunk moves forward with the struck vehicle, while the inertial mass of the head leaves the head behind. The neck, existing between these two large inertial masses, is subjected to mechanical stresses, and may become injured. The injury occurs because there are mechanical stresses to the structures of the neck that occur as a consequence of inertial loading.

    The cranial-cervical junction and the upper cervical spine are a mechanically unique region of the spinal column. Their mechanically unique characteristics increase the vulnerability of the upper cervical spine tissues to inertial injury. Four relevant unique mechanical characteristics to this discussion include:

    1) The center of mass of the head exists at the location of the sella turcica, the bony location of the pituitary gland. A mechanical lever arm exists between the sella turcica and the joints of the upper cervical spine, especially the occiput, first cervical vertebrae (C1, or atlas), and the second cervical vertebrae (C2 or axis).

    When the head becomes inertially involved in the mechanism of a trauma, this unique lever arm increases the inertial injury to the cranial-upper cervical spine region.

    2) A general biomechanical principle includes the understanding that there is a trade-off between mobility and stability. Joints that have greater mobility have reduced stability. Joints that have great stability have reduced mobility. Joints that have great mobility have increased vulnerability to injury (including inertial injury).

    Although it is not commonly understood, 55% of cervical spine (neck) rotation (turning to the left or right) occurs at a single joint. This joint possesses great mobility, but at a price of reduced stability and increased vulnerability to inertial injury. The joint is the atlas-axis joint (C1-C2).

    3) Very little motion occurs between the skull (occiput bone, CO) and the atlas vertebrae (C1). Consequently, during inertial loading, the occiput bone and the atlas vertebrae often function together. This increases the mechanical stresses between the atlas (C1) and the axis (C2). Once again, the atlas-axis joint (C1-C2) has increased vulnerability to inertial injury.

    4) A main stabilizing ligament of the cranial-cervical region is called the alar ligament. The alar ligaments exist between the odontoid process of the axis (C2) and the lateral masses of the occiput bone.

    alar ligament

    The alar ligaments connect the odontoid process (dens) of the axis vertebrae (C2) to the occipital condyles of the occiput bone of the skull.

    •••••

    There is no doubt that a percentage of whiplash injured patients will develop chronic pain that does not improve or go away after all possible monetary compensation has been obtained. Representative examples include:

    • A 1990 study reviewed the long-term status of whiplash-injured patients. They reviewed 43 patients who had sustained soft-tissue injuries of the neck after a mean 10.8 years. Of these, only 12% had recovered completely and 88% suffered from residual symptoms. Of these residual symptoms, 28% were intrusive and 12% were severe. After two years, symptoms did not alter with further passage of time, remaining chronic. This indicates that 40% of whiplash-injured patients continued to suffer from significant residual symptoms more than a decade after being injured.

    (Gargan, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British), 1990)

    • A 1996 study reviewed the long-term status of whiplash-injured patients 15.5 years after injury. The authors documented that 70% of the patients continued to complain of symptoms referable to the original accident. In addition, 33% complained of intrusive symptoms and 10% were unable to work and relied heavily on analgesics or alternative therapy. This means that 43% had significant problems caused by whiplash injury more than 15 years after being injured. Surprisingly, these authors also documented that 60% of symptomatic patients had not seen a doctor in the previous five years because the doctors were unable to help them, and that 18% of these patients had taken early retirement due to their health problems, which they related to the whiplash injury. They also documented that whiplash symptoms do not improve after settlement of litigation.

    • A 2002 study looked at the health status of whiplash-injured patients 17 years after injury. At the time, this was the longest follow-up study on whiplash-injured patients published. The authors documented that 55% of the patients still suffered from pain caused by the original trauma 17 years later.

    (Bunketorp, European Spine Journal, 2002)

    • A 2007 review article documents that between 15-40% of those who are injured in a motor vehicle collision will suffer from ongoing chronic pain.

    (Schofferman, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 2007)

    • A 2005, 7.5-year prospective study on whiplash-injured patients found that 21% had intrusive symptoms that interfered with work and leisure, and required continued treatment and drugs. In addition, 2% of these whiplash-injured patients had severe pain and problems that required ongoing medical investigations and drugs. This means that 23% of whiplash-injured patients had significant problems more than 7 years after being injured.

    (Tomlinson, Injury, 2005)

    • A 2009 review article pertaining to whiplash injury and including 100 citations, thoroughly reviewed 15 studies pertaining to whiplash-injury outcomes. The authors document that fewer than 50% of all patients made a full recovery and that 4.5% are permanently disabled. In addition, they document that whiplash-injured patients are 5 times more likely to suffer from chronic neck pain than control populations. The view that a whiplash-injured patient’s symptoms will improve once litigation has finished “is unsupported by the literature.”

    (Bannister, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British, 2009)

    • A very recent study (June 2010), published the assessment of whiplash-injured patients 30 years after injury, making this the longest follow-up of whiplash-injured patients to date. Once again, this study shows that a significant number of those injured in whiplash trauma will suffer with chronic symptoms. Thirty years after being injured, 40% of patients retain nuisance symptoms and 15% have significant symptoms and impairments, requiring ongoing treatment.

    (Rooker, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British, 2010)

    Again, with there being no doubt to the chronicity of symptoms for some patients following whiplash trauma, numerous clinical investigations have been performed in the assessment of the tissue origin of these symptoms. These investigations have included the careful fluoroscopic insertions of anesthetic needles using gold-standard protocols and techniques. The majority of these studies have focused on the tissues of the lower cervical spine. Since 1993, it has been firmly established the primary tissue source for chronic whiplash injury symptoms are the facet joints of the lower cervical spine, with the annulus of the disc being a close second source.

    (Bogduk, Pain, 1993)

    However, recently, researchers have turned their attention to the tissues of the upper cervical spine as a source of chronic symptoms following whiplash trauma, especially if the symptom complex includes headaches. Specifically, these researchers have focused on the alar ligaments. As noted above, the alar ligaments are particularly vulnerable to inertial loading injury.

    Historically, the most important whiplash injury physician was Ruth Jackson, MD. Ruth Jackson was born in 1902 and graduated from Baylor University College of Medicine in Dallas in 1928. In 1937, she became the first woman to be certified by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery. From 1936 to 1941, Dr. Jackson was Chief of Orthopedics at Parkland Hospital in Fairmont, Texas. In 1945, she had her own private clinic built in Dallas, retiring in 1989 at the age of 87.

    In her career, Dr. Jackson published more than twenty-five articles, and she lectured extensively in the United States and throughout the world. Dr. Jackson had a special interest in injuries of the cervical spine. Her interest arose after a neck injury she sustained in a motor-vehicle accident. In 1956 she published her acclaimed, authoritative book entitled The Cervical Syndrome. The fourth and final edition of her book was published in 1978. Dr. Jackson personally treated more than 20,000 whiplash-injured patients.

    (Jackson, The Cervical Syndrome, 1978)

    In her 1978 book, Dr. Jackson discusses the mechanics of the alar ligament injury from whiplash trauma. She also discussed documentation of these injuries using stress radiographs of the upper cervical spine.

    After Computed Tomography (CT) scanning became more available, the documentation of alar ligament injury from whiplash trauma became more precise and definitive than the stress radiography methods of Dr. Ruth Jackson. The CT scanning procedure recommended consists of using high-resolution images of the ligaments of the occiput-atlas-axis complex while the patient is in a position of maximum upper cervical spine and head rotation.

    (Panjabi, Journal of Spinal Disorders, 1991)

    (Panjabi, Journal of Orthopedic Research, 1991)

    (Dvorak, Spine, 1987)

    Recent advances in MR imaging have further enhanced the assessment of the health of the alar ligaments, and have eliminated the concerns of excessive exposure to ionizing radiation coupled with CT technology. These studies have specifically compared the status of alar ligament health in chronic whiplash patients and compared them to asymptomatic control populations. A pioneering such study appeared in the journal Neurology in 2002, and was titled:

    MRI assessment of the alar ligaments in the late stage of whiplash injury:

    A study of structural abnormalities and observer agreement

    These authors were able to characterize and classify structural changes in the alar ligaments in the late stage of whiplash injuries by using proton density weighted MRI technology, and evaluate the reliability and the validity of their procedures. They studied 92 whiplash-injured and 30 uninjured individuals who underwent proton density-weighted MRI of the cranial-cervical junction in three orthogonal planes. They concluded:

    “Whiplash trauma can cause permanent damage to the alar ligaments, which can be shown by high-resolution proton density-weighted MRI.”

    The authors of this study made the following important points:

    • Alar ligaments consist primarily of collagen proteins with a few elastic fibers. In contrast to elastic fibers, which can tolerate elongation up to 200% before failure, collagen ligaments will fail at only 8% elongation. Consequently, the alar ligaments are particularly vulnerable to traumatic stretching loads.

    • The cranial-cervical ligaments are very vulnerable to sudden acceleration and/or deceleration of the head.

    • Several studies have documented traumatic alar ligament ruptures or injuries from whiplash trauma mechanisms.

    • Plain cervical radiographs are usually normal following whiplash injury.

    • The strength of the MRI magnet is important. They suggest that the strength be at least 1.5 tesla.

    • The thickness of the section slices is important. They suggest that the slices not be less than 2 mm thick from the foramen magnum to the base of the dens. A slice thickness of 2 mm gives excellent spatial resolution of injured alar ligaments.

    • T2-weighted images give inadequate discrimination between ligament, bone and soft tissue due to a low signal-to-noise ratio.

    • T1-weighted images give poor contrast resolution and thus less ability to differentiate small variations in signal and therefore to assess injury.

    • “A proton-density weighted sequence is the technique of choice for assessment of [alar] ligamentous abnormalities.”

    • This study confirms that the alar ligaments are vulnerable to whiplash trauma, “and that the severity of the lesions can be graded using high-resolution MRI.”

    • Whiplash trauma can cause permanent damage to the alar ligaments, and this damage can be shown by high-resolution proton density-weighted MRI.

     

    • Alar ligament damage can take up to 2 years for complete healing.

    • Cranial cervical junction ligament injury may prove to be the structural substrate for the chronic whiplash syndrome.

    •••••

    In 2005, a follow-up study was published in the Journal of Neurotrauma, titled:

    Whiplash-Associated Disorders Impairment Rating:

    Neck Disability Index Score According to Severity of MRI Findings of Ligaments and Membranes in the Upper Cervical Spine

     

    These authors evaluated the ligaments of the upper cervical spine with proton-density weighted MR imaging, comparing it to pain and functional disability in whiplash-injured patients. The authors found:

    “Symptoms and complaints among [whiplash-injured] patients can be linked with structural abnormalities in ligaments and membranes in the upper cervical spine, in particular the alar ligaments.”

    The authors of this study made the following important points:

    • Whiplash can injure the ligaments of the upper cervical spine.

    • Injury to the ligaments of the upper cervical spine can be imaged with proton-density weighted MRI.

    • “Post-traumatic changes of the alar ligaments have been proposed to be the cause of chronic pain in patients after whiplash.”

    • The alar and transverse ligaments, and membranes in the upper cervical spine, as well as the lesions of these structures, can be visualized by high resolution MRI. “Thus, it now seems possible to demonstrate physical evidence of a neck injury in WAD patients.”

    • Documented lesions to the alar ligaments were associated with more severe chronic whiplash symptoms.

    • Chronic whiplash subjective symptoms and complaints can be a consequence of injuries to ligaments and membranes in the cranial-cervical junction.

    • “The alar ligaments appeared to be the most important structure in a whiplash trauma, as it was the structure with the most frequent high-grade MRI abnormalities.”

    • Alar ligament abnormalities also show the most consistency with disability scores.

    • “Lesions of the alar ligaments can be a common denominator in explaining the pain and functional disability in the neck after a WAD trauma.”

    • Women appeared to be more injured, explained by the “fact that the neck muscles are weaker in females, thus making their neck structures more vulnerable when under the influence of abrupt external forces.”

    • “In summary, the present study shows that increasing severity of MRI findings of soft tissue structures in the upper cervical spine is related to increasing levels of neck pain and functional disability, as experienced by persons with a diagnosis of [whiplash injury].”

     

    •••••

    Later in 2005, the Journal of Neurotrauma published another study titled:

    Head Position and Impact Direction in Whiplash Injuries:

    Associations with MRI-Verified Lesions of Ligaments and

    Membranes in the Upper Cervical Spine

    These authors compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of soft tissue structures in the upper cervical spine of whiplash-injured patients, a control population, and specific facts regarding the mechanism of injury. They were able to determine that the alar ligaments of the upper cervical spine were most vulnerable to injury when the patient’s “head/neck was turned to one side at the moment of collision.” The authors also made the following important points:

    • Since the late 1980s it has been known that the alar ligaments could be injured from neck trauma, especially if the head is rotated at time of accident.

    • The alar ligaments could be irreversibly overstretched or ruptured when the head is rotated and bent by the impact of whiplash trauma.

    • There is growing evidence that whiplash injury is linked to soft tissue lesions in the cranial-cervical junction.

    • The patients who had their head rotated at the instant of collision had more often injuries of the alar ligaments than those with their head in a neutral position.

    • In rear end collisions, the alar ligament most likely to be injured was on the side opposite of head rotation. [If the head was turned to the left, the usual alar ligament injury was on the right].

    • The alar ligaments are the most injured from neck trauma, especially if the head is rotated at time of accident.

    • Alar ligaments can be irreversibly overstretched or ruptured when the head is rotated and bent by impact trauma.

    • An abnormal alar ligament is the strongest predictor for severity of subjective symptoms and functional disability in whiplash-injured patients.

    • The severity of injury to the alar and transverse ligaments depends on head rotation at the moment of collision.

    • The best diagnostic tool to assess injury to the upper cervical ligaments and membranes is the proton density-weighted MRI examination.

    • The alar ligaments are particularly vulnerable when the head is rotated and bent by impact trauma, “especially in unexpected rear-end collision.”

    • Head rotation and awareness are more important than speed, type of headrest, sitting position, and fitness level when considering injury from whiplash trauma.

    • Upper cervical ligament injuries represent “chronic lesions” that are responsible for chronic WAD pain.

    •••••

    In 2006, the journal Spine published an article titled:

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Craniovertebral Ligaments and Membranes After Whiplash Trauma

    These authors presented a review the literature on soft tissue lesions of the upper cervical spine in whiplash trauma with focus on neuroimaging. They concluded:

    “Whiplash trauma can damage soft tissue structures of the upper cervical spine, particularly the alar ligaments”

    The authors of this study also made the following important points:

    • “Most investigators who have studied the natural history of whiplash patients have found long-term symptoms in 24% to 70%, among whom 12% to 16% are severely impaired many years after the accident interfering with their job and everyday activities.”

    • Whiplash trauma can damage soft tissue structures of the upper cervical spine, particularly the alar ligaments.

    • The soft tissues of the cranial-cervical joints can be imaged by use of high-resolution proton-density weighted MR imaging.

    • “The alar ligaments are particularly vulnerable to neck trauma when the head is rotated at the moment of impact.”

    “When the head rotates, the alar ligaments twist around the dens. Reaching 90° rotation, these ligaments are maximally tightened and obtain an anteroposterior orientation. Not unexpected, such tightened anteroposteriorly oriented alar ligaments are more vulnerable to hyperextension-hyperflexion trauma than relaxed, transversely oriented ligaments.”

    • “Our findings add support to the hypothesis that injured soft tissue structures in the upper cervical spine, particularly the alar ligaments, play an important role in the understanding of the chronic whiplash syndrome.”

    • To best examine the alar ligaments with MRI, proton-density weighted formatting should be used (not T1- and T2-weighted sequences), the magnet should have a least 1.5 Tesla strength, and the slice thickness should not exceed 2 mm.

    • “Injured soft tissue structures in the upper cervical spine, particularly the alar ligaments, play an important role in the understanding of the chronic whiplash syndrome.”

    •••••

    In 2009, the journal Pain Research and Management published an article titled:

    Dynamic kinemagnetic resonance imaging in whiplash patients

    These authors presented a study comparing the motion of the upper cervical spine in chronic whiplash-injured patients with that of normal controls, and comparing both groups with findings from proton-density weighted MR imaging. They concluded:

    Whiplash patients with longstanding symptoms had both more abnormal signals from the alar ligaments and more abnormal movements on dMRI at the Occiput-C2 level than controls.

    The authors of this study also made the following important points:

    • On average, 30% (range 11% to 42%) of people with acute whiplash develop chronic whiplash symptoms.

    • “Injury to the alar ligaments associated with neck sprain could be a cause of pain and disability among these [chronic whiplash] patients.”

    • Whiplash injury to the upper cervical spine can cause balance disturbance, dizziness, visual problems and jaw problems.

    • The stability of the cranial-cervical junction is primarily provided by the alar and transverse ligaments.

    • “The alar ligaments restrain rotation of the upper cervical spine.”

    • “The alar ligaments may be irreversibly overstretched or even ruptured in unexpected rear-end collisions.”

    • Alar ligament integrity can be assessed using high-resolution proton density-weighted dynamic MRI.

    • Chronic whiplash patient symptoms attributable to Occiput-C1-C2, include:

    Neck pain

    Headache

    Upper limb symptoms

    Lower limb symptoms

    Loss of balance

    Some tongue numbness

    • “Because of the lack of a disc and the horizontal nature of the facet joints, the stability of the atlanto-axial complex depends mainly on the ligaments and muscles.”

    • 55% of the rotation of the cervical spine occurs at the C1-C2 joint.

    5% of the rotation of the cervical spine occurs at the Occiput-C1 joint.

    40% of the rotation of the cervical spine occurs at C2-C7.

    • “Symptoms and complaints among WAD patients can be linked with structural abnormalities of the ligaments and membranes of the upper cervical spine, particularly the alar ligaments.”

    •••••

    ENDING REMARKS:

    The discussion presented here indicates the following pertaining to the alar ligaments of the upper cervical spine:

    1) They can sustain inertial injuries during whiplash trauma.

    2) The injuries to the alar ligaments can be responsible for chronic whiplash symptoms.

    3) Alar ligament injury can cause neck pain, but also headache, tinnitus, vertigo, light-headedness, unsteadiness, etc.

    4) Alar ligament injuries are often permanent.

    5) Alar ligament injuries are best diagnosed using proton density MR imaging.

    Alar ligament problems pose both mechanical and proprioceptive problems for the patient. Experience indicates that carefully applied chiropractic adjustments to this sensitive spinal region can significantly improve and help manage these otherwise very difficult chronic injuries.

    REFERENCES

    Gargan MF, Bannister GC. Long-Term Prognosis of Soft-Tissue Injuries of the Neck. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British); Vol. 72-B, No. 5, September 1990, pp. 901-3.

    Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister CG. Soft-tissue Injuries of the Cervical Spine: 15-year Follow-up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British). November 1996, Vol. 78-B, No. 6, pp. 955-7.

    Schofferman J, Bogduk N, Slosar P.; Chronic whiplash and whiplash-associated disorders: An evidence-based approach; Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; October 2007;15(10):596-606.

    Bunketorp L, Nordholm L, Carlsson J; A descriptive analysis of disorders in patients 17 years following motor vehicle accidents; European Spine Journal, June 2002; 11:227-234.

    Tomlinson PJ, Gargan MF, Bannister GC. The fluctuation in recovery following whiplash injury: 7.5-year prospective review. Injury. Volume 36, Issue 6, June 2005, Pages 758-761.

    Bannister GC, Amirfeyz R, Kelley S, Gargan MF. Whiplash Injury. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British). July 2009, Vol. 91B, no. 7, pp. 845-850.

    Rooker J, Bannister M, Amirfeyz R, Squires B, Gargan M, Bannister G; Whiplash Injury: 30-Year follow-up of a single series; Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery – British Volume, Volume 92-B, Issue 6, pp. 853-855.

    Bogduk N, Aprill C; On the nature of neck pain, discography and cervical zygapophysial joint blocks; Pain. August 1993;54(2):213-7.

    Jackson R, The Cervical Syndrome, Thomas, 1978.

    Panjabi M, Dvorak J, Crisco J, Oda T, Hilibrand A, Grob D; Journal of Spinal Disorders; June 1991;4(2):157-67.

    Panjabi M, Dvorak J, Crisco JJ, Oda T, Wang P, Grob D; Effects of alar ligament transection on upper cervical spine rotation. Journal of Orthopedic Research. July 1991;9(4):584-93.

    Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Gerber M, Wichmann W; CT-functional diagnostics of the rotatory instability of upper cervical spine: An experimental study on cadavers. Spine. April 1987;12(3):197-205.

    Krakenes J, Kaale BR, Moen G, Nordli H, Gilhus NE, Rorvik J. MRI assessment of the alar ligaments in the late stage of whiplash injury:

    A study of structural abnormalities and observer agreement; Neuroradiology 2002 Jul;44(7):617-24.

    Kaale BR, Krakenes J, Albreksten G, Wester K; Whiplash-Associated Disorders Impairment Rating: Neck Disability Index Score According to Severity of MRI Findings of Ligaments and Membranes in the Upper Cervical Spine Journal of Neurortrauma; Volume 22, Number 4, April 2005, pp. 466–475.

    Kaale BR, Krakenes J, Albreksen G, Wester K; Head Position and Impact Direction in Whiplash Injuries: Associations with MRI-Verified Lesions of Ligaments and Membranes in the Upper Cervical Spine; Journal of Neurotrauma; Volume 22, Number 11, November 2005, pp. 1294–1302.

    Krakenes J, Kaale BR; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Craniovertebral Ligaments and Membranes After Whiplash Trauma; Spine;

    November 15, 2006, Volume 31, Number 24, pp 2820-2826.

    Lindgren KA, Kettunen JA, Paatelma M, Mikkonen RH. Dynamic kine magnetic resonance imaging in whiplash patients; Pain Research and Management; Nov-Dec 2009;Vol. 14, No. 6; pp. 427-32.

  • Neck & Back Pain Diagnosis

    Neck & Back Pain Diagnosis

    Format Clinical Features Connecting The Dots

    Personal injury cases have two components: a healthcare component and a legal component. Much of the legal component of a personal injury case is hinged upon the records of the healthcare provider. The healthcare records are often thoroughly reviewed. Accurate and complete healthcare records will protect the legal component of a personal injury claim. In contrast, healthcare records that are inaccurate will hurt the legal component of the case.

    What is the patient’s diagnosis?

    A diagnosis is a guess as to what is wrong with the patient. It is the treating doctor’s best guess as to the root causes of the patient’s symptoms and signs. As more information is obtained, the diagnosis will often change or be confirmed. For example, the doctor will probably suspect a discogenic L5 nerve root radiculopathy when a patient presents with low back and unilateral leg pain that extends below the knee, and examination shows a positive straight-leg-raising test at 35°, weakness of the extensor hallicus longus muscle, and hypoesthesia in an L5 dermatomal pattern. The diagnosis is confirmed when an exposed MRI shows a posterolateral L4 disc herniation compressing the L5 nerve root.

    Also, for the legally defined expert treating doctor, the diagnosis falls under the standard of reasonable probability. As an example, it is often claimed that the cause of back pain is actually unknown or unproven in 85% of cases (Chou). Yet, essentially no healthcare providers list the diagnosis as “unknown.” Therefore, doctors often list a diagnosis based on reasonable probability. Seattle personal injury attorney Richard Adler (Adler) often defines reasonable probability as a 51% or greater chance of accuracy. I have heard him say often that the personal injury-treating doctor who has qualified as an expert to testify should be 100% certain that their opinion is at least 51% accurate. As an example, published studies (Kuslich) indicate that the tissue origin of pain in chronic low back pain patients is the annulus of the disc is more than half of the cases. This constitutes a reasonable probability. Another example is that published studies (Bogduk) indicate that the tissue origin of pain in chronic whiplash-injured patients is the facet joints in more than half of the cases. This also constitutes reasonable probability. A third example indicates that if a whiplash-injured patient had pre-accident degenerative joint disease of the cervical spine, follow-up x-rays taken 7 years later indicate that 55% developed degenerative disc disease at adjacent levels (Hohl); one could state that patients with pre-accident degenerative joint disease of the cervical spine who sustain a motor vehicle collision injury, will have a reasonable probability of developing disc degeneration at an adjacent level within the next seven years.

    An actual example is a court case I testified in with an experienced personal injury attorney. This attorney thoroughly explored my opinions during my direct examination. After direct examination comes cross-examination by the insurance company attorney. His attempt to discredit me proceeded as follows:

    QUESTION:

    What is in your hand?

    ANSWER:

    A cup.

    QUESTION:

    What is in the cup?

    ANSWER:

    Water.

    QUESTION:

    Are you certain?

    ANSWER:

    Yes.

    QUESTION:

    Can you state with the same degree of certainty that you have a cup of water in your hand that the testimony you gave during your direct examination is accurate?

    OBJECTION (by the plaintiff attorney who had just completed my direct examination):

    [He] is holding the doctor to a standard that is not the law. The standard is to a reasonable probability, a 51% chance or greater, not to 100% certainty.

    JUDGE:

    Sustained.

    ANSWER:

    I state with the same degree of certainty that I have a cup of water in my hand that the testimony I gave is reasonably probable.

    It is not below the standard for a diagnosis to be incorrect, as long as it is consistent with the evidence presented in a particular case. The classic evidence collected in a whiplash injury (or in most musculoskeletal cases) includes the history, the complaints, the examination findings, and imaging, such as x-rays, stress radiographs, videofluoroscopy, MRI, CT scan, etc.

    Because treatment is designed to improve the pathophysiological process expressed in the diagnosis, appropriate treatment should improve the patient’s symptoms and signs. When expected improvement does not present, it is possible that the diagnosis was incorrect. Additional diagnostic investigations or possible referral to another provider is warranted.

    In our electronic age, the clinical diagnosis is a numerical code or codes. Statisticians, policy makers, politicians, governmental agencies, reimbursement assessment personnel, electronic billing services, etc., like and even demand, these numerical diagnostic codes. It makes it much easier to evaluate and control the health care provider and the case. It makes it much easier to create policy and establish “outcome evidence.” These codes create simplicity.

    However, what if the simple code is purposefully or inadvertently inaccurate? What if the health care provider used codes that have historically proven to generate better reimbursement rather than codes that more accurately represent the patient’s true clinical status? What if the health care provider had some educational gaps or lack of educational understanding of certain physiological processes and consequently used an incorrect diagnostic code? Then statistics, policies, and “outcome evidence” would all be erroneous.

    In addition, and quite importantly, the convenience and simplicity of diagnostic codes may over simplify the true extent or uniqueness of a particular patient’s injuries. This scenario is particularly adverse for a patient with a personal injury because it could influence aspects of the legal component of the patient’s case.

    I have a friend who is both a chiropractor and a personal injury attorney. As a personal injury attorney, he has worked for both the plaintiff (for our injured patient) and for the defense (for the insurance company of the person who caused the injury to our patient). He has repeatedly expressed to me that the most prevalent “weak link” in a personal injury case treated by health care providers is the diagnosis. It is his position that as a rule, the diagnosis in the file or in the insurance billing forms is not supported by the history, complaint, examination findings and/or imaging studies. My friend has often expressed to me that he can discredit most health care providers by officially asking them a handful of questions pertaining to their diagnosis. In fact, my friend says that when discrediting the expertise of the treating doctor, probing the details and accuracy of the diagnosis is so simple and effective, that it is his standard starting point, and often the only process the doctor will have to endure before loss of credibility is assured.

    Most health care providers use multiple diagnoses on every patient. Consequently, for a whiplash-injured patient, words (or codes) such as sprain, strain, myofascial pain syndrome, intervertebral disc syndrome, facet syndrome, radiculitis, radiculopathy, neuritis, neuropathy, nerve compression syndrome, headache, cervicogenic headache, subluxation, instability, carpal tunnel syndrome, thoracic outlet syndrome, double crush syndrome, myelopathy, cauda equina syndrome, fibromyalgia, etc., are commonly found.

    For each and every word used in the diagnosis, the health care provider should be able to do the following:

    • Define the word. The dictionary denotation is not always necessary. Often, a layperson’s connotation will suffice, and may be preferred.
    • Know the history that is consistent with the word. As an example, are there historic facts that might distinguish a sprain injury from a strain injury? Is the diagnostic word used consistent with the given history?
    • Know the clinical features for the word. What examination findings (clinical features) support the diagnosis? As an example, what are the examination findings that support the diagnosis of strain; or, what are the examination findings that support the diagnosis of sprain?
    • Knowing what the clinical features are is important, but is not enough. The clinical features must be found in the records. A diagnosis not supported by the records is problematic and probably will be challenged on occasion.

    EXAMPLE 1, Strain:

    QUESTION:

    Your diagnosis includes strain injury to the posterior cervical-thoracic spine. What is a strain injury?

    ANSWER:

    The soft tissue that moves bones are muscles. Muscles are attached to the bone by tendons. A strain is an injury to a muscle or to a tendon. A strain injury is considered to be a soft tissue injury because it does not involve injury to the bone.

    QUESTION:

    What history is consistent with a strain injury?

    ANSWER:

    There are three classic historic mechanisms for a strain injury:

    1) A mechanism of overstretching. The injury occurs at the extreme of motion.

    2) A mechanism of muscle contracting against a load that is too great for the muscle. The injury occurs in the middle of the range of motion.

    3) Unaccustomed repetitive contracting of a muscle. The injury occurs in the middle of the range of motion.

    QUESTION:

    In this case, was one or more of these mechanisms documented through the taking of the patient’s history?

    ANSWER:

    Yes. The history is that of a whiplash mechanism, which is a classic example of muscle overstretching.

    QUESTION:

    What are the clinical features of a strain injury?

    ANSWER:

    • Pain on resistive efforts.
    • Pain on stretching.
    • Pain on moderate digital pressure.
    • Alterations of muscle tone (usually it is increased).
    • Alterations of normal palpatory textures (such as swelling, edema).

    QUESTION:

    Can you please show me where these clinical findings are documented in your records?

    ANSWER:

    [You had better be able to do this, show him/her where the clinical features are documented in the records].

    EXAMPLE 2, Sprain:

    QUESTION:

    Your diagnosis includes sprain injury to the facet capsular ligaments of the lower cervical spine. What is a sprain injury?

    ANSWER:

    The soft tissue that stops the movement of a bone at the joint is the ligament. Ligaments attach bones to bones at the joint. If the joint is moved too far, the ligament is injured. This injury to the ligament is called a sprain. A sprain injury is also considered to be a soft tissue injury because it does not involve injury to the bone.

    QUESTION:

    What history is consistent with is a sprain injury?

    ANSWER:

    Ligaments are not injured in the middle of the range of motion. Rather, ligaments are only injured after the end of the range of motion is reached, and then motion exceeds the normal end of the range of motion. A history of exceeding the normal magnitude of range of motion is necessary for a sprain injury.

    QUESTION:

    In this case, is there a history of exceeding the normal magnitude of the range of motion?

    ANSWER:

    Yes. The history is that of a whiplash mechanism, which is a classic example of exceeding the normal range of motion of the facet joints of the cervical spine. Whiplash injury is proven to exceed the range of motion of the cervical spine facet joints, injuring the facet joint capsular ligaments. This constitutes a sprain injury.

    QUESTION:

    What are the clinical features of a sprain injury?

    ANSWER:

    • Pain at the end of the passive range of motion.
    • Associated protective muscle spasm at the end of the passive range of motion.
    • Point tenderness with digital pressure over the injured ligament.
    • Palpable or visible swelling.
    • The diagnosis is confirmed if stress radiographs show signs of clinical instability or segmental hypermobility.

    QUESTION:

    Can you please show me where these clinical findings are documented in your records?

    ANSWER:

    [Once again, you had better be able to do this, show him/her where the clinical features are documented in the records].

    EXAMPLE 3, Right C7 discogenic radiculopathy:

    QUESTION:

    Your diagnosis includes right C7 discogenic radiculopathy. What is a C7 radiculopathy?

    ANSWER:

    The bones of the spine are called vertebrae. Between every two adjacent vertebrae exits two nerves, one from the right side and the other from the left side. Because these nerves are attached to the spinal cord, they are called nerve roots. Radiculopathy means that a nerve root is injured and is not functioning properly. C7 indicates that the nerve root in question is exiting from between the sixth and seventh cervical vertebrae.

    QUESTION:

    What does discogenic radiculopathy mean?

    ANSWER:

    It means that the cause of the injury and dysfunction to the C7 nerve root is the C6-C7 intervertebral disc. The C6-C7 disc is irritating or pressing upon the C7 nerve root, causing its dysfunction. The disc is causing the radiculopathy, or discogenic radiculopathy.

    QUESTION:

    What history is consistent with a discogenic radiculopathy?

    ANSWER:

    There are two classic historic mechanisms for a discogenic radiculopathy:

    1) As a consequence of injury.

    2) As a consequence of degenerative disease.

    QUESTION:

    In this case, was one of these mechanisms documented through the taking of the patient’s history?

    ANSWER:

    Yes. The history is that of a whiplash mechanism, which can injure the intervertebral disc, causing irritation and dysfunction of the adjacent nerve root.

    QUESTION:

    Could the discogenic radiculopathy in this case be as a consequence of degenerative disease?

    ANSWER:

    No. The initial x-rays, which were taken the day following the whiplash injury, showed no signs of pre-accident degenerative disease. In addition, the symptoms and signs of discogenic radiculopathy developed acutely, immediately after being involved in this motor vehicle collision. It is therefore reasonably probable that the C7 discogenic radiculopathy was caused by the forces produced during this collision, the causation is post-traumatic. The cause is not degenerative.

    QUESTION:

    What are the clinical features of a C7 discogenic radiculopathy?

    ANSWER:

    • Symptoms include pain radiating from the neck and into the arm, and often into the hand.
    • The symptoms are aggravated by performing the shoulder depression test.
    • The symptoms are aggravated upon compressing the head into the spine (foramina compression test), especially if the neck is slightly laterally flexed to the right, and even more likely if the neck is both laterally flexed to the right with simultaneous right side rotation (Spurling’s test).
    • A diminished right triceps deep tendon reflex.
    • Weakness in the C7 myotomes (triceps [elbow extension], wrist flexors, finger extensors), possibly accompanied with atrophy of the associated muscles.
    • Altered superficial sensation in a C7 dermatomal pattern, classically the anterior surface of the third digit.

    QUESTION:

    Can you please show me where these clinical findings are documented in your records?

    ANSWER:

    [Again, you had better be able to do this, show him/her where the clinical features are documented in the records; not all of the clinical features need to be present to diagnose a suspected C7 radiculopathy, but having over half positive would argue in favor of the reasonable probability of such a diagnosis].

    QUESTION:

    Are there any imaging tests that confirm your diagnosis?

    ANSWER:

    Yes. To confirm my diagnosis, I ordered an MRI which was taken one week following the injury. The results show a right-sided herniation of the C6-C7 disc putting pressure on the right C7 nerve root.

    The treating doctor should be able to answer this format of questions for every word that is used in the diagnosis.

    Diagnostic Format

    The patient’s diagnosis will and often should change (become updated) as the patient’s clinical status changes as a consequence of time and/or treatment. Spasm, radiculopathy, headache, etc., can resolve. Acute problems can become subacute or chronic. Post-traumatic scar tissue or fibrosis may develop.

    To adequately describe a patient’s biological uniqueness subsequent to an injury, for more than 30 years I have advocated the three-point diagnostic format. This format also helps organize the doctor’s thoughts as to updating the diagnosis. The three components are:

    1) List the mechanism of injury. The mechanism of injury never changes from the beginning of a case though the end of the case. The initial mechanism of injury is always the same throughout the case. A typical example would be:

    Hyperextension strain and sprain injury to the lower cervical and upper thoracic paraspinal soft tissues.

    2) List things that occurred as a consequence of the mechanism of injury. These resulting problems can change or resolve as a consequence of time and/or treatment. Therefore, updated diagnoses will often reflect these changes in the second part of the diagnostic format. I tend to list these resulting problems into four categories.

    Examples include:

    Problems in Muscles

    Problems in Joints

    Problems in Nerves

    Problems in Bones

    Myalgia

    Subluxation

    Radiculitis

    Fracture

    Myofascial Pain Syndrome

    Altered Instantaneous Axis of Rotation

    Radiculopathy

    Spasm

    Clinical Instability

    Neuritis

    Facet Joint Syndrome

    Neuropathy

    Denervation Supersensitivity

    Myelopathy

    Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    The second part of the diagnostic format may also include multifaceted syndromes, such as intervertebral disc syndrome, fibromyalgia syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome, cervicogenic headache, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, vertigo, canalithiasis, BPPV (benign paroxysmal positional vertigo), thoracic outlet syndrome, etc.

    The typical example would continue:

    Hyperextension strain and sprain injury to the lower cervical and upper thoracic paraspinal soft tissues; with resulting myalgia and spasm of the affected muscles, altered instantaneous axis of rotation of the occiput-atlas-axis (subluxation complex), and right C7 motor and sensory radiculopathy

    3) The third component of the diagnostic format is a listing of factors that makes a particular case more difficult or complicated than the usual case. It is important to list these factors not as being caused by the mechanism of the injury, but rather as factors that pre-existed the injury. Consequently, they complicate the recovery of those things that were caused by the injury.

    Examples include:

    Degenerative joint disease

    Discogenic spondylosis

    Facet joint arthrosis

    Central canal stenosis

    Cervical rib(s)

    Hemi or Demi vertebrae

    Scoliosis

    Tropism

    Lumbosacral transitional segment

    Spondylolisthesis

    Old spinal fractures

    Osteoporosis

    Rheumatoid arthritis

    ETC.

    As a rule, the third (complicating) component of the diagnosis does not change as a function of time or treatment. The typical diagnosis example would continue:

    Hyperextension strain and sprain injury to the lower cervical and upper thoracic paraspinal soft tissues; with resulting myalgia and spasm of the affected muscles, altered instantaneous axis of rotation of the occiput-atlas-axis (subluxation complex), and right C7 motor and sensory radiculopathy; complicated by a moderate cervicothoracic scoliosis, facet joint arthrosis C6-C7 bilaterally, and bilateral cervical ribs.

    I advocate performing a complete reevaluation of the patient every 12 visits. At that time, depending on symptoms, signs, and examination findings, the second part of the diagnosis should be updated. Regardless of the billing diagnosis, the three point diagnostic format should be found in the file with as much detail as possible to truly represent the uniqueness of the patient’s injuries and unique complicating factors to recovery. This approach will help protect the legal component of the patient’s injury claim.

    Dan Murphy, DC, DABCO


    REFERENCES

    Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT, Shekelle P, Owens DK, for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians and the American College of Physicians/American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel; Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians (ACP) and the American Pain Society (APS); Annals of Internal Medicine; Volume 147, Number 7, October 2007, pp. 478-491.

    Adler R; From Injury to Action: Navigating Your Personal Injury Claim; AdlerGiersch; 2011.

    Hohl M; The Cervical Spine; The Cervical Spine Research Society; Lippincott, 1989; page 440.

    Kuslich S, Ulstrom C, Michael C; The Tissue Origin of Low Back Pain and Sciatica: A Report of Pain Response to Tissue Stimulation During Operations on the Lumbar Spine Using Local Anesthesia; Orthopedic Clinics of North America, Vol. 22, No. 2, April 1991, pp.181-7.

    Bogduk N, Aprill C; On the nature of neck pain, discography and cervical zygapophysial joint blocks; Pain. August 1993;54(2):213-7.